Literature DB >> 30051229

Direct observation of telephone communication between community pharmacies and prescribers in New Zealand.

Nastassja Trausch1, James A Green2.   

Abstract

Background Phone calls between pharmacists and prescribers play an important role in resolving potential errors and other issues. Despite their importance in patient care, and sometimes causing frustration for pharmacists, there is little research on these calls. Objective To quantify how long calls between pharmacists and prescribers are, how often phone calls occur, why calls are made, and who is called. Method An observational study was conducted with 130.5 h observed in 11 community pharmacies over 8 weeks in Dunedin, New Zealand, recording information about all incoming and outgoing calls. Data captured included information on length, date, time, reason for call, pharmacy staff involved, health professionals involved, and the place being called. We also surveyed pharmacists' perceptions of this communication. Results Data on 95 phone calls was captured. The mean length was 110 s (95% CI 88-133), at an average of 0.7 calls per hour. The most frequent reasons for calling were clarifications and dose inquiries. Conclusion Calling prescribers is perceived as a frustrating; however the frequency of calls we observed was low, but some were long. The amount of time spent for pharmacist interventions may be reduced using alternative communication methods but these need further study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community pharmacy; Interprofessional communication; New Zealand; Pharmacist intervention; Prescriber; Telephone call

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30051229     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-018-0687-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  7 in total

1.  Physicians' perceptions of communication with and responsibilities of pharmacists.

Authors:  P L Ranelli; J Biss
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  A tool to teach communication skills to pharmacy students.

Authors:  Sanah Hasan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Face and politeness in pharmacist-physician interaction.

Authors:  B L Lambert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Interprofessional communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marina Weissenborn; Walter E Haefeli; Frank Peters-Klimm; Hanna M Seidling
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-03-17

5.  Effects of computerized physician order entry on medication turnaround time and orders requiring pharmacist intervention.

Authors:  Lloyd Davis; Luigi Brunetti; Eui-Kyung Lee; Nari Yoon; Sung-Hee Cho; Dong-Churl Suh
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-12-03

6.  Directness and deference in pharmacy students' messages to physicians.

Authors:  B L Lambert
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Pharmacist and physician views on collaborative practice: Findings from the community pharmaceutical care project.

Authors:  Deborah V Kelly; Lisa Bishop; Stephanie Young; John Hawboldt; Leslie Phillips; T Montgomery Keough
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2013-07
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical and Organizational Impacts of Medical Ordering Settings on Patient Pathway and Community Pharmacy Dispensing Process: The Prospective ORDHOSPIVILLE Study.

Authors:  Justine Clarenne; Julien Gravoulet; Virginie Chopard; Julia Rouge; Amélie Lestrille; François Dupuis; Léa Aubert; Sophie Malblanc; Coralie Barbe; Florian Slimano; Céline Mongaret
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.