Literature DB >> 30050992

Utility and performance characteristics of a novel submucosal injection agent (EleviewTM) for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Mohit Girotra1, George Triadafilopoulos2, Shai Friedland2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Submucosal injection of a lifting agent is a critical step in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Literature suggests superiority of other viscous solutions over normal saline (NS), but research to determine the ideal submucosal injection is still ongoing. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated the utility and performance characteristics of a novel submucosal injection agent (EleviewTM) for EMR and ESD.
METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients referred for EMR/ESD to a tertiary referral center with experienced large polyp expert were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients with large colon polyps (mean age 66.3 years), and one patient each with esophageal and gastric lesions were included. EleviewTM was injected as submucosal lifting agent, and EMR/ESD performed. Main outcome measurements included the duration of submucosal elevation, volume and number of injections required to maintain cushion, and complications.
RESULTS: Single injection of 3-5 cc of EleviewTM outlasted the duration of EMR. However, mean duration of cushion achieved during longer procedures (ESD) was 12.5 min, requiring several additional injections. R0 resection was achieved in 10/12 patients. One patient had minor bleeding which was managed intra-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: EleviewTM was successful in achieving long duration of submucosal elevation, allowing safe and efficient performance of EMR as a single injection, but needed repeated injections during longer ESD procedures. Prospective controlled trials are required to compare its performance to other available viscous submucosal solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EleviewTM; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); endoscopic submucosal injection; mucosal lifting

Year:  2018        PMID: 30050992      PMCID: PMC6043759          DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.06.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 2415-1289


  15 in total

1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Joo Ha Hwang; Vani Konda; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Shailendra S Chauhan; Brintha K Enestvedt; Larissa L Fujii-Lau; Sri Komanduri; John T Maple; Faris M Murad; Rahul Pannala; Nirav C Thosani; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Clinical efficacy of EMR with submucosal injection of a fibrinogen mixture: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Jeong-Hoon Park; Do Hyun Park; Il-Kwun Chung; Hong-Soo Kim; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim; Hyun-Deuk Cho
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  High-pressure jet injection of viscous solutions for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a study on ex vivo pig stomachs.

Authors:  Mathieu Pioche; Mihai Ciocirlan; Vincent Lépilliez; Damien Salmon; Laetitia Mais; Olivier Guillaud; Valérie Hervieu; Marco Petronio; Isabelle Lienhart; Jean-Luc Adriano; Cyril Lafon; Thierry Ponchon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of giant laterally spreading tumors with submucosal injection of hydroxyethyl starch: comparative study with normal saline solution.

Authors:  Kostas Fasoulas; Georgia Lazaraki; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; George Paroutoglou; Taxiarchis Katsinelos; Eleni Dimou; Christos Geros; Christos Zavos; Jannis Kountouras; Panagiotis Katsinelos
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  A randomized, double-blind trial of succinylated gelatin submucosal injection for endoscopic resection of large sessile polyps of the colon.

Authors:  Alan Moss; Michael J Bourke; Andrew J Metz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Efficacy and safety of SIC-8000 (Eleview®) for submucosal injection for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in an in vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Marco Spadaccini; Cesare Hassan; Roberta Maselli; Ferdinando D'Amico; Laura Lamonaca; Vincenzo Craviotto; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 7.  Normal saline solution versus other viscous solutions for submucosal injection during endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harathi Yandrapu; Madhav Desai; Sameer Siddique; Prashanth Vennalganti; Sreekar Vennalaganti; Sravanthi Parasa; Tarun Rai; Vijay Kanakadandi; Ajay Bansal; Mohammad Titi; Alessandro Repici; Matthew L Bechtold; Prateek Sharma; Abhishek Choudhary
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Usefulness and safety of 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution as a submucosal fluid "cushion" in endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective multicenter trial.

Authors:  Hironori Yamamoto; Naohisa Yahagi; Tsuneo Oyama; Takuji Gotoda; Toshihiko Doi; Shoji Hirasaki; Tadakazu Shimoda; Kentaro Sugano; Hisao Tajiri; Takao Takekoshi; Daizo Saito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A comparative study of 50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosal fluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; Jannis Kountouras; George Paroutoglou; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Ioannis Pilpilidis; George Gelas; Dimitris Paikos; Konstantinos Karakousis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Efficacy of a reverse-phase polymer as a submucosal injection solution for EMR: a comparative study (with video).

Authors:  Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; Sohail N Shaikh; Arielle Cohen; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States.

Authors:  Makoto Nishimura
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-09-04

2.  An internal magnet traction device reduces procedure time for endoscopic submucosal dissection by expert and non-expert endoscopists: ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model (with video).

Authors:  Akira Dobashi; Andrew C Storm; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Jodie L Deters; Charles A Miller; Crystal J Tholen; Christopher J Gostout; Elizabeth Rajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLift™ in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps.

Authors:  Mike T Wei; Christine Y Louie; Yu Chen; Jennifer Y Pan; Susan Y Quan; Robert Wong; Ryanne Brown; Melissa Clark; Kristin Jensen; Hubert Lau; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Submucosal Injection Solution for Resection of Gastrointestinal Lesions.

Authors:  Cristina Moles-Aranda; Raquel González-Pérez; Francisco Javier Gallego-Rojo; Olga Martínez-Augustin; Beatriz Clares-Naveros; Fermín Sánchez de Medina; José Antonio Morales-Molina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Novel technique for endoscopic en bloc resection (EMR+) - Evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Benjamin Meier; Andreas Wannhoff; Christoph Klinger; Karel Caca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Evaluation of Eleview® Bioadhesive Properties and Cushion-Forming Ability.

Authors:  Valentina Giannino; Lucia Salandin; Cristina Macelloni; Luigi Maria Longo
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation on the Effectiveness of Alginate-Based Gastric Mucosal Protective Gel.

Authors:  Hang Zeng; Muye He; Minyi Yang; Zhu Meng; Han Wang; Chunren Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.246

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.