| Literature DB >> 30050928 |
Diego Augusto Santos Silva1,2, Tiago Rodrigues de Lima1, Mark Stephen Tremblay2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between health-related physical fitness components (aerobic fitness, muscle strength, flexibility, and body fat) and resting heart rate (RHR) in Brazilian adolescents. The study included 695 schoolchildren (14-19 years) from public schools of the city of São José, Brazil. RHR was evaluated using an automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer. Aerobic fitness was assessed by the modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test; muscle strength was measured by handgrip dynamometer; flexibility was assessed by the sit-and-reach test; and body fat was assessed indirectly by sum of two skinfold thicknesses (triceps and subscapular). Sociodemographic variables, habitual physical activity, sexual maturation, and body mass index were the covariates. Cardiorespiratory fitness (β = -0.11; 95%CI: -0.14, -0.08) and handgrip strength (β = -0.10; 95%CI: -0.18, -0.01) were inversely associated with RHR in boys. For girls, cardiorespiratory fitness (β = -0.09; 95%CI: -0.12, -0.06) was inversely associated with RHR. In both sexes, body fat (β = 0.50; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.75 for boys; β = 0.17; 95%CI: 0.36, 2.72 for girls) was directly associated with RHR. The RHR is measured more easily than the physical fitness tests, so it is recommended to assess adolescent's heath in large surveillance systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30050928 PMCID: PMC6046174 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3812197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Characteristics of the sample.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 76.1 (13.6) | 81.1 (10.9) | <0.01 | 0.40 |
|
| 16.2 (0.1) | 16.0 (0.1) | <0.01 | 0.18 |
|
| 65.7 (0.5) | 58.5 (0.5) | <0.01 | 0.60 |
|
| 172.7 (0.3) | 161.3 (0.2) | <0.01 | 1.69 |
|
| 22.0 (3.6) | 22.4 (4.0) | 0.04 | 0.11 |
|
| 10.8 (5.1) | 18.7 (6.9) | <0.01 | 1.30 |
|
| 10.8 (4.8) | 15.5 (7.2) | <0.01 | 0.76 |
|
| 21.5 (9.5) | 34.3 (13.5) | <0.01 | 1.09 |
|
| 42.7 (5.4) | 35.3 (3.7) | <0.01 | 1.60 |
|
| 71.8 (17.3) | 45.4 (10.4) | <0.01 | 1.85 |
|
| 28.7 (7.6) | 29.5 (7.6) | 0.08 | 0.11 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Active | 99 (57.9) | 72 (42.1) | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| Less active | 238 (45.4) | 286 (54.6) | ||
|
| ||||
| Pubescent | 244 (52.7) | 219 (47.3) | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Post-Pubescent | 93 (40.1) | 139 (59.9) | ||
RHR: resting heart rate; SD: Standard Deviation; ∗p<0.05; Cohen's D: effect size for comparison between groups; Cramer's V: effect size for chi-square test.
Relationship between resting heart rate and health-related physical fitness components in adolescents.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||
| Aerobic fitness | -0.09 | (-0.11; -0.07) | <0.01 | 0.15 | -0.11 | (-0.14; -0.08) | <0.01 | 0.21 | 0.27 |
| Handgrip strength | -0.13 | (-0.20; -0.06) | <0.01 | 0.02 | -0.10 | (-0.18; -0.01) | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Sit-and-reach test | -0.15 | (-0.31; 0.15) | 0.07 | 0.01 | -0.15 | (-0.34; 0.03) | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Sum of skinfolds | 0.11 | (-0.22; 0.24) | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.50 | (0.25; 0.75) | <0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
|
| |||||||||
| Aerobic fitness | -0.05 | (-0.08;-0.03) | <0.01 | 0.04 | -0.09 | (-0.12; -0.06) | <0.01 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Handgrip strength | -0.10 | (-0.20; -0.01) | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.04 | (-0.15; 0.05) | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Sit-and-reach test | -0.04 | (-0.17; 0.08) | 0.47 | 0.01 | -0.05 | (-0.19; 0.09) | 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Sum of skinfolds | -0.05 | (-0.12; 0.01) | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.17 | (0.36; 2.72) | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
a: regression coefficient; b: adjusted analysis by sex, age, physical activity, sexual maturation, and body mass index; R2: determination coefficient; CI: confidence interval; Cohen's f2:effect size for multiple linear regression; df: degree freedom.
Figure 1Comparison of resting heart rate (mean and 95% confidence intervals) according to the categories of health-related physical fitness components among males. Analysis of covariance with age, physical activity, and sexual maturation as covariates. ∗ higher values when compared to the third tertile; ∗∗ higher values when compared to the second and third tertile.
Figure 2Comparison of resting heart rate (mean and 95% confidence intervals) according to the categories of health-related physical fitness components among females. Analysis of covariance with age, physical activity, and sexual maturation as covariates. ∗∗ higher values when compared to the second and third tertile.