Literature DB >> 30050769

Computer Aided Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield (CANARY) characterization of adenocarcinoma: radiologic biopsy, risk stratification and future directions.

Ryan Clay1, Srinivasan Rajagopalan2, Ronald Karwoski2, Fabien Maldonado3, Tobias Peikert1, Brian Bartholmai4.   

Abstract

The majority of incidentally and screen-detected lung cancers are adenocarcinomas. Optimal management of these tumors is clinically challenging due to variability in tumor histopathology and behavior. Invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) is generally aggressive while adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) may be extremely indolent. Computer Aided Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield (CANARY) is a quantitative computed tomography (CT) analysis tool that allows non-invasive assessment of tumor characteristics. This analysis may obviate the need for tissue biopsy and facilitate the risk stratification of adenocarcinoma of the lung. CANARY was developed by unsupervised machine learning techniques using CT data of histopathologically-characterized adenocarcinomas of the lung. This technique identified 9 distinct exemplars that constitute the spectrum of CT features found in adenocarcinoma of the lung. The distributions of these features in a nodule correlate with histopathology. Further automated clustering of CANARY nodules defined three distinct groups that have distinctly different post-resection disease free survival (DFS). CANARY has been validated within the NLST cohort and multiple other cohorts. Using semi-automated segmentation as input to CANARY, there is excellent repeatability and interoperator correlation of results. Confirmation and longitudinal tracking of indolent adenocarcinoma with CANARY may ultimately add decision support in nuanced cases where surgery may not be in the best interest of the patient due to competing comorbidity. Currently under investigation is CANARY's role in detecting differing driver mutations and tumor response to targeted chemotherapeutics. Combining the results from CANARY analysis with clinical information and other quantitative techniques such as analysis of the tumor-free surrounding lung may aid in building more powerful predictive models. The next step in CANARY investigation will be its prospective application, both in selecting low-risk stage 1 adenocarcinoma for active surveillance and investigation in selecting high-risk early stage adenocarcinoma for adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer Aided Nodule Analysis and Risk Yield (CANARY); Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); adenocarcinoma of the lung; quantitative CT analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30050769      PMCID: PMC6037967          DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


  42 in total

1.  Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Linda S Kinsinger; Charles Anderson; Jane Kim; Martha Larson; Stephanie H Chan; Heather A King; Kathryn L Rice; Christopher G Slatore; Nichole T Tanner; Kathleen Pittman; Robert J Monte; Rebecca B McNeil; Janet M Grubber; Michael J Kelley; Dawn Provenzale; Santanu K Datta; Nina S Sperber; Lottie K Barnes; David H Abbott; Kellie J Sims; Richard L Whitley; R Ryanne Wu; George L Jackson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Indolent, Potentially Inconsequential Lung Cancers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study.

Authors:  Prashanth M Thalanayar; Nejat Altintas; Joel L Weissfeld; Carl R Fuhrman; David O Wilson
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-08

3.  Noninvasive Computed Tomography-based Risk Stratification of Lung Adenocarcinomas in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Fabien Maldonado; Fenghai Duan; Sushravya M Raghunath; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Ronald A Karwoski; Kavita Garg; Erin Greco; Hrudaya Nath; Richard A Robb; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomography to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201).

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Teruaki Koike; Takashi Asakawa; Masahiko Kusumoto; Hisao Asamura; Kanji Nagai; Hirohito Tada; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Taro Shibata; Haruhiko Fukuda; Harubumi Kato
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Thomas E Hartman; David E Midthun; Jeff A Sloan; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Medy A Clemens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Noninvasive risk stratification of lung adenocarcinoma using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Sushravya Raghunath; Fabien Maldonado; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Ronald A Karwoski; Zackary S DePew; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert; Richard A Robb
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Turning gray: the natural history of lung cancer over time.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Christopher J Gibson
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pignon; Hélène Tribodet; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Jean-Yves Douillard; Frances A Shepherd; Richard J Stephens; Ariane Dunant; Valter Torri; Rafael Rosell; Lesley Seymour; Stephen G Spiro; Estelle Rolland; Roldano Fossati; Delphine Aubert; Keyue Ding; David Waller; Thierry Le Chevalier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Anne V Gonzalez; Michael A Jantz; Mitchell L Margolis; Michael K Gould; Lynn T Tanoue; Loren J Harris; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  KRAS mutation is an important predictor of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Erminia Massarelli; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Ximing Tang; Ana C Xavier; Natalie C Ozburn; Diane D Liu; Benjamin N Bekele; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  Volume doubling time and radiomic features predict tumor behavior of screen-detected lung cancers.

Authors:  Jaileene Pérez-Morales; Hong Lu; Wei Mu; Ilke Tunali; Tugce Kutuk; Steven A Eschrich; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Peritumoral and intratumoral radiomic features predict survival outcomes among patients diagnosed in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Jaileene Pérez-Morales; Ilke Tunali; Olya Stringfield; Steven A Eschrich; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.