| Literature DB >> 30050322 |
Katsutoshi Seto1, Hiroaki Kuroda1, Tatsuya Yoshida2, Shozo Sakata1, Tetsuya Mizuno1, Noriaki Sakakura1, Toyoaki Hida2, Yasushi Yatabe3, Yukinori Sakao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There have been few studies that have fully elucidated the relationship between genomic mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinomas and occult lymph node (LN) metastases (pN1-2) despite a preoperative clinical N0 stage (cN0). It is well known that anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are more likely to occur in younger patients with high grade tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the genomic status, examine the clinicopathologic features, and evaluate whether ALK mutations are associated with occult LN metastases.Entities:
Keywords: ALK; PET; adenocarcinoma; lung cancer; occult lymph node
Year: 2018 PMID: 30050322 PMCID: PMC6055903 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S147569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Characteristics of patients with cN0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma
| Variables | Mutation (+) n=324 | Triple negative n=135 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, (male/female) | 127/197 (39.2%) | 92/43 (68.1%) | <0.01* |
| Age (years) | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 65±10 (29–87) | 66±9 (32–83) | 0.36 |
| Smoking index | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 269.2±438.6 (0–2500) | 628.2±646.3 (0–2820) | <0.01* |
| CEA | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 3.8±5.4 (0.5–53.4) | 6.1±10.1 (0.6–57.7) | <0.01* |
| Tumor maximum size on CT (mm) | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 26.5±12.8 (9–103) | 28.5±15.7 (8–90) | 0.46 |
| C/T ratio (%) on CT | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 74.6±27.4 (0–100) | 77.2±28.1 (0–100) | 0.13 |
| SUV max | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 3.3±4.8 (0–28) | 4.8±6.3 (0–27) | 0.06 |
| Pathological maximum size (mm) | |||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 22.7±13.1 (6–132) | 25.4±15.1 (7–100) | 0.94 |
| Pathological LN status | 0.27 | ||
| N0 | 270 (83.3%) | 118 (87.4%) | |
| N1/2 | 54 (16.7%) | 17 (12.6%) | |
| Pathological stage | 0.44 | ||
| 0 | 2 (0.6%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| IA | 204 (62.9%) | 78 (57.8%) | |
| IB | 58 (17.9%) | 29 (21.5%) | |
| IIA | 25 (7.8%) | 14 (10.4%) | |
| IIB | 6 (1.9%) | 5 (3.7%) | |
| IIIA | 28 (8.6%) | 7 (5.2%) | |
| IIIB | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.7%) | |
| Procedure | 0.59 | ||
| Sublobar | 60 (1.8%) | 29 (21.5%) | |
| Lobectomy | 262 (80.6%) | 106 (78.5%) | |
| Pneumonectomy | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) |
Note: The * symbol indicates significant difference.
Abbreviations: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CT, computed tomography; LN, lymph node; SD, standard deviation; SUV max, maximum standardized uptake value.
Characteristics of patients with cN0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had gene mutations
| Variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, (male/female) | 98/168 (36.8%) | 21/18 (53.8%) | 8/11 (42.1%) | 0.12 |
| Age (years) | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 66±9 (29–87) | 68±9 (46–83) | 52±10 (33–66) | <0.01* |
| Smoking index | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 235.4±426.9 (0–2500) | 517.7±492.9 (0–1680) | 231.6±321.1 (0–900) | <0.01* |
| CEA | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 3.6±4.6 (0.5–53.4) | 3.8±3.8 (0.6–21.7) | 6.2±13.4 (0.5–52.6) | 0.15 |
| Tumor maximum size on CT (mm) | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 26.3±11.0 (10–67) | 30.8±21.3 (10–103) | 20.6±12.6 (9–54) | 0.01* |
| C/T ratio (%) on CT | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 72.9±27.5 (0–100) | 82.3±25.9 (26–100) | 82.3±25.9 (26–100) | <0.01* |
| SUV max | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 3.3±4.9 (0–28.0) | 3.0±4.4 (0–14.5) | 3.2±3.8 (0–11.2) | 0.83 |
| Pathological maximum size (mm) | ||||
| Mean ± SD (range) | 22.2±9.7 (7–70) | 28.1±26.0 (10–132) | 18.2±13.0 (6–55) | 0.02* |
| Pathological LN status | 0.02* | |||
| N0 | 222 (83.5%) | 36 (92.3%) | 12 (63.2%) | |
| N1/2 | 44 (16.5%) | 3 (7.7%) | 7 (36.8%) | |
| Pathological stage | 0.84 | |||
| 0 | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| IA | 169 (63.5%) | 23 (59.0%) | 12 (63.1%) | |
| IB | 50 (18.8%) | 8 (20.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| IIA | 19 (7.1%) | 2 (5.1%) | 4 (21.0%) | |
| IIB | 2 (0.8%) | 3 (7.7%) | 1 (5.3%) | |
| IIIA | 25 (9.4%) | 2 (5.1%) | 1 (5.3%) | |
| IIIB | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5.3%) | |
| Procedure | 0.92 | |||
| Sublobar | 49 (18.4%) | 8 (20.5%) | 3 (15.8%) | |
| Lobectomy | 216 (81.2%) | 31 (79.5%) | 15 (78.9%) | |
| Pneumonectomy | 1 (0.4%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (5.3%) |
Note: The * symbol indicates significant difference.
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CT, computed tomography; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; KRAS, kirsten ras genes; LN, lymph node; SD, standard deviation; SUV max, maximum standardized uptake value.
Figure 1The proportion of patients with cN0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma found to have LN metastases on pathology (pN1, gray; pN2, black; node negative patients [cN0 → pN0], white) in each mutational classification.
Notes: Patients with ALK rearrangement tended to have a higher incidence of occult hilar or mediastinal LN metastases. Triple negative indicates patients with no mutation in ALK, EGFR, or KRAS.
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; KRAS, kirsten ras genes; LN, lymph node.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathological variables associated with occult LN metastases in pulmonary adenocarcinoma
| Variables | Univariate
| Multivariate
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| HR (CI) | |||
| Patient characteristics | |||
| Sex: male vs female | 0.97 | – | – |
| Smoking: >600 vs ≤600 | 0.07 | – | – |
| Tumor marker | |||
| CEA: >5 vs ≤5 | <0.01 | 2.14 (1.19–3.88) | 0.01 |
| Preoperative radiological findings | |||
| Tumor maximum diameter on CT: >30.0 vs ≤30.0 | <0.01 | 2.41 (1.36–4.27) | <0.01 |
| C/T ratio: >50.0 vs ≤50.0 | <0.01 | 3.87 (1.76–8.48) | <0.01 |
| SUV: >3 vs ≤3 | <0.01 | 1.35 (0.76–2.41) | 0.31 |
| Procedures | |||
| Lobectomy: vs sublobar | 0.03 | 0.77 (0.31–1.85) | 0.55 |
| Pathological genomic mutation | |||
| | 0.01 | 4.57 (1.54–3.5) | <0.01 |
Note: The en-dashes indicate no verification of the significant difference by univariate analysis.
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; CT, computed tomography; LN, lymph node; SUV, standardized uptake value.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves for the disease-free survival: (A) comparison of triple negative (dotted line) versus any mutation status (solid line); and (B) comparison of each of the mutations: EGFR, KRAS, and ALK.
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; KRAS, kirsten ras genes.