| Literature DB >> 30050137 |
Dongrui Ma1, Zhenfeng Liu1, Li Jun Loh1, Yongxing Zhao1, Guang Li1, Reginald Liew2, Omedul Islam1, Jianjun Wu1, Ying Ying Chung1, Wee Siong Teo3, Chi Keong Ching3, Boon Yew Tan3, Daniel Chong3, Kah Leng Ho3, Paul Lim3, Rita Yu Yin Yong4, Brian K Panama5, Aaron D Kaplan5, Glenna C L Bett5, James Ware6, Connie R Bezzina7, Arie O Verkerk7, Stuart A Cook1,2,6, Randall L Rasmusson8, Heming Wei9,10.
Abstract
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmia commonly associated with SCN5A mutations, yet its ionic mechanisms remain unclear due to a lack of cellular models. Here, we used human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) from a BrS patient (BrS1) to evaluate the roles of Na+ currents (INa) and transient outward K+ currents (Ito) in BrS induced action potential (AP) changes. To understand the role of these current changes in repolarization we employed dynamic clamp to "electronically express" IK1 and restore normal resting membrane potentials and allow normal recovery of the inactivating currents, INa, ICa and Ito. HiPSC-CMs were generated from BrS1 with a compound SCN5A mutation (p. A226V & p. R1629X) and a healthy sibling control (CON1). Genome edited hiPSC-CMs (BrS2) with a milder p. T1620M mutation and a commercial control (CON2) were also studied. CON1, CON2 and BrS2, had unaltered peak INa amplitudes, and normal APs whereas BrS1, with over 75% loss of INa, displayed a loss-of-INa basal AP morphology (at 1.0 Hz) manifested by a reduced maximum upstroke velocity (by ~80%, p < 0.001) and AP amplitude (p < 0.001), and an increased phase-1 repolarization pro-arrhythmic AP morphology (at 0.1 Hz) in ~25% of cells characterized by marked APD shortening (~65% shortening, p < 0.001). Moreover, Ito densities of BrS1 and CON1 were comparable and increased from 1.0 Hz to 0.1 Hz by ~ 100%. These data indicate that a repolarization deficit could be a mechanism underlying BrS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30050137 PMCID: PMC6062539 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29574-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of hiPSC line and hiPSC-CMs. Representative data from BrS hiPSCs are presented. (A) The expression of pluripotent stem cell markers Oct-4, SSEA-4, Tra-1–60 and Tra-1–81; (B) Teratoma formation in SCID mice after hiPSCs injection confirmed by identifying three primitive germ layers: intestine (top) for endoderm, cartilage (middle) for mesoderm and neuroepithelium (bottom) for ectoderm. (C) Normal karyotype identified with BrS hiPSCs. (D) markers of cardiomyocytes identified with hiPSC-CMs. Top: α-actinin; Middle: β-MHC; and Bottom: cardiac titin.
Figure 2Expression of SCN5A/Nav1.5 and INa density documented in tsa201 heterologous expression system. tsa201 cells transfected with equal amount of WT-SCN5A, A226V-SCN5A, R1629X-SCN5A and A226V-SCN5A + R1629X-SCN5A (50% each) were assayed for SCN5A/Nav1.5 expression and INa density. (Aa) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of Nav1.5 (purple) in tsa201cells. Arrows indicate the Nav1.5 staining. Levels of Nav1.5 were semi-quantified and plotted in a bar-graph (n = 3). (Ab) Representative Western blotting image of Nav1.5 in tsa201 transfected cells (n = 3). (B) Peak INa density measured in transfected tsa201 cells. (C) and (D) Steady state (SS)-inactivation and activation curves of INa measured in tsa201 expressing WT- and A226V-SCN5A. *p < 0.05; vs. WT-SCN5A.
Figure 3SCN5A and Nav1.5 expressions and INa measured in hiPSC-CMs. (A) Level of SCN5A mRNA in BrS1 (hiPSC-CMs from a BrS patient with compound SCN5A mutations) and CON1 (the sib of BrS1) determined by qPCR. n = 3. (B) Representative traces of sodium currents in the control (CON1) and patient (BrS1). (C) Peak INa density measured in BrS1 and CON1. (D–F) Steady state (SS)-inactivation, activation and recovery from inactivation curves of INa. Values given are mean ± SEM. †p < 0.01; vs. CON1.
Figure 4A basal action potential pattern of BrS identified in BrS1. (A and B) Representative AP waveforms recorded from a CON1 and a BrS1 paced at 1.0 Hz. The solid and dashed arrows indicate APA measured at phase-0 and phase-2, respectively. (C) The main AP parameters of CON1 and BrS1 are plotted and compared in bar-graphs. Values given are mean ± SEM. ||p < 0.00001; vs. CON1 (by unpaired t-test).
Figure 5Effects of low heart rates on APs of BrS1 and CON1 hiPSC-CMs. (A, B1 and B2) (Top): representative superimposed AP waveforms recorded from CON1 and two BrS1 subgroups (non-early repolarization and early repolarization), sequentially paced at 1.0 Hz, 0.5 Hz and 0.1 Hz. (A, B1 and B2) (Bottom): superimposed AP waveforms continually recorded from CON1 and two BrS1 subgroups sequentially paced at 1.0 Hz and 0.1 Hz. (C) Main AP parameters plotted and compared among groups in bar-graphs. Values given are mean ± SEM. Statistics were performed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc testing. *p < 0.05; †p < 0.01; ‡P < 0.001. Black symbols: Intra-(sub) group comparisons. 0.1 Hz/0.5 Hz vs. 1.0 Hz. Pink symbols: vs. BrS1 (non-ER subgroup) at the same frequency. Green symbols: vs. CON1 subgroup at 1.0, 0.5 and 0.1 Hz.
Figure 6Validation of the rate-dependent effects on APs in BrS2 and CON2. (A) Representative superimposed AP waveforms of a CON2 cell paced at 1.0 and 0.1 Hz at 24 °C. (B and C) Representative superimposed AP waveforms of BrS2 cells paced at 1 and 0.1 Hz at 24 °C and 34 °C, respectively. (D) Main AP parameters are plotted and compared among groups in bar-graphs. Values given are mean ± SEM. Statistics were performed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc testing (by paired t-test). *p < 0.05; ‡P < 0.001.
Figure 7Effects of heart rates on Ito in hiPSC-CMs. (A-left and B-left) Representative traces of Ito currents recorded from CON1 (n = 26) and BrS (n = 22) paced at 1.0 Hz and 0.1 Hz. (A-middle and B-middle) I-V relationships of Ito show the current densities. (A-right and B-right) Graphic demonstrations and comparisons of Ito (recorded at +50 mV) in each cell are presented. Values given are mean ± SEM. §p < 0.0001; ||p < 0.00001; vs. 1.0 Hz (by paired t-test and one-way ANOVA test). ‡P < 0.001, vs. low Ito group.
Figure 8Effects of 4-AP and flecainide on APs. (A) Representative superimposed AP waveforms of a BrS1 cell paced at 0.1 Hz and subsequently exposed to 0.05 mM and 0.5 mM 4-AP. Main AP parameters (showing only the results of 0.5 mM 4-AP) are presented in bar-graphs. (B) Representative superimposed AP waveforms of a V-like BrS1 hiPSC-CM paced at 1.0 Hz followed by flecainide (10 µM) treatment. Main AP parameters are presented in bar-graphs. Values given are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05; †p < 0.01; §p < 0.0001; ||p < 0.00001 (by paired t-test); vs. 0.1 Hz (for 4-AP) or 0.1 Hz (for flecainide).