Literature DB >> 30049724

Blood pressure intervention levels in preterm infants: pilot randomised trial.

Sujith Stanley Pereira1,2, Ajay Kumar Sinha1,2, Joan Katherine Morris3, David F Wertheim4, Divyen K Shah1,2, Stephen Terence Kempley1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the feasibility of a trial allocating different blood pressure (BP) intervention levels for treatment in extremely preterm infants.
DESIGN: Three-arm open randomised controlled trial performed between February 2013 and April 2015.
SETTING: Single tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Infants born <29 weeks' gestation were eligible to participate, if parents consented and they did not have a major congenital malformation.
INTERVENTIONS: Infants were randomised to different levels of mean arterial BP at which they received cardiovascular support: active (<30 mm Hg), moderate (<gestational age mm Hg) or permissive (signs of poor perfusion or <19 mm Hg). Once this threshold was breached, all were managed using the same treatment guideline. BP profiles were downloaded continuously; cardiac output and carotid blood flow were measured at 1 day and 3 days, and amplitude integrated EEG was recorded during the first week. Cranial ultrasound scans were reviewed blind to study allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Inotrope usage and achieved BP.
RESULTS: Of 134 cases screened, 60 were enrolled, with mean gestation 25.8 weeks (SD 1.5) and birth weight 817 g (SD 190). Invasively measured BP on the first day and inotrope usage were highest in the active and lowest in the permissive arms. There were no differences in haemodynamic or EEG variables or in clinical complications. Predefined cranial ultrasound findings did not differ significantly; no infants in the active arm had parenchymal brain lesions.
CONCLUSION: The BP threshold used to trigger treatment affects the achieved BP and inotrope usage, and it was possible to explore these effects using this study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN83507686. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; extremely preterm infant; randomised trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30049724     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  3 in total

1.  Late failure of cerebral autoregulation in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is associated with brain injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  Zachary A Vesoulis; Steve M Liao; Amit M Mathur
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Eligibility Criteria and Representativeness of Randomized Clinical Trials That Include Infants Born Extremely Premature: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leeann R Pavlek; Brian K Rivera; Charles V Smith; Joanie Randle; Cory Hanlon; Kristi Small; Edward F Bell; Matthew A Rysavy; Sara Conroy; Carl H Backes
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.314

3.  Discrepancy between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure readings in extremely preterm infants in the first four weeks of life.

Authors:  Tobias Werther; Lukas Aichhorn; Sigrid Baumgartner; Angelika Berger; Katrin Klebermass-Schrehof; Ulrike Salzer-Muhar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.