Literature DB >> 30049456

Clustered DNA damage concentrated in particle trajectories causes persistent large-scale rearrangements in chromatin architecture.

Sara Timm1, Yvonne Lorat1, Burkhard Jakob2, Gisela Taucher-Scholz2, Claudia E Rübe3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: High linear-energy-transfer (LET) irradiation (IR) is characterized by unique depth-dose distribution and advantageous biologic effectiveness compared to low-LET-IR, offering promising alternatives for radio-resistant tumors in clinical oncology. While low-LET-IR induces single DNA lesions such as double-strand breaks (DSBs), localized energy deposition along high-LET particle trajectories induces clustered DNA lesions that are more challenging to repair. During DNA damage response (DDR) 53BP1 and ATM are required for Kap1-dependent chromatin relaxation, thereby sustaining heterochromatic DSB repair. Here, spatiotemporal dynamics of chromatin restructuring were visualized during DDR after high-LET and low-LET-IR.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human fibroblasts were irradiated with high-LET carbon/calcium ions or low-LET photons. At 0.1 h, 0.5 h, 5 h and 24 h post-IR fluorophore- and gold-labeled repair factors (53BP1, pATM, pKAP-1, pKu70) were visualized by immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy, to monitor formation and repair of DNA damage in chromatin ultrastructure. To track chromatin remodeling at damage sites, decondensed regions (DCR) were delineated based on local chromatin concentration densities.
RESULTS: Low-LET-IR induced single DNA lesions throughout the nucleus, but nearly all DSBs were efficiently rejoined without visible chromatin decompaction. High-LET-IR induced clustered DNA damage and triggered profound changes in chromatin structure along particle trajectories. In DCR multiple heterochromatic DSBs exhibited delayed repair despite cooperative activity of 53BP1, pATM, pKap-1. These closely localized DSBs may disturb efficient repair and subsequent chromatin restoration, thereby affecting large-scale genome organization.
CONCLUSION: Clustered damage concentrated in particle trajectories causes persistent rearrangements in chromatin architecture, which may affect structural and functional organization of cell nuclei.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charged-particle radiotherapy; Chromatin remodeling; DNA damage; Double-strand breaks (DSBs); Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ); Particle trajectories; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30049456     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  15 in total

Review 1.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts.

Authors:  Dietrich Averbeck; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  IL1 Pathway in HPV-Negative HNSCC Cells Is an Indicator of Radioresistance After Photon and Carbon Ion Irradiation Without Functional Involvement.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Tiwari; Ricarda Hannen; Kristian Unger; Sibylla Kohl; Julia Heß; Kirsten Lauber; Florentine S B Subtil; Ekkehard Dikomey; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Ulrike Schötz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM) Analysis of Nuclear Reorganization Induced by Clustered DNA Damage Upon Charged Particle Irradiation.

Authors:  Susanne Tonnemacher; Mikhail Eltsov; Burkhard Jakob
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Nanostructure of Clustered DNA Damage in Leukocytes after In-Solution Irradiation with the Alpha Emitter Ra-223.

Authors:  Harry Scherthan; Jin-Ho Lee; Emanuel Maus; Sarah Schumann; Razan Muhtadi; Robert Chojowski; Matthias Port; Michael Lassmann; Felix Bestvater; Michael Hausmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Ionizing Radiation and Complex DNA Damage: From Prediction to Detection Challenges and Biological Significance.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Spyridon A Kalospyros; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  USP9X Is Required to Maintain Cell Survival in Response to High-LET Radiation.

Authors:  Catherine M Nickson; Maria Rita Fabbrizi; Rachel J Carter; Jonathan R Hughes; Andrzej Kacperek; Mark A Hill; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Proton Irradiation Increases the Necessity for Homologous Recombination Repair Along with the Indispensability of Non-Homologous End Joining.

Authors:  Klaudia Szymonowicz; Adam Krysztofiak; Jansje van der Linden; Ajvar Kern; Simon Deycmar; Sebastian Oeck; Anthony Squire; Benjamin Koska; Julian Hlouschek; Melanie Vüllings; Christian Neander; Jens T Siveke; Johann Matschke; Martin Pruschy; Beate Timmermann; Verena Jendrossek
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  In Situ Detection of Complex DNA Damage Using Microscopy: A Rough Road Ahead.

Authors:  Zacharenia Nikitaki; Eloise Pariset; Damir Sudar; Sylvain V Costes; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Comparison of High- and Low-LET Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Break Processing in Living Cells.

Authors:  Stefan J Roobol; Irene van den Bent; Wiggert A van Cappellen; Tsion E Abraham; Maarten W Paul; Roland Kanaar; Adriaan B Houtsmuller; Dik C van Gent; Jeroen Essers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.