| Literature DB >> 30049183 |
Masahiko Kinoshita1, Shigekazu Takemura, Shogo Tanaka, Hiroji Shinkawa, Genya Hamano, Tokuji Ito, Masaki Koda, Takanori Aota, Yasuni Nakanuma, Yasunori Sato, Shoji Nakamori, Akira Arimoto, Takatsugu Yamamoto, Hideyoshi Toyokawa, Shoji Kubo.
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to identify the clinical significance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in patients with occupational cholangiocarcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: Occupational cholangiocarcinoma; lymph node metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30049183 PMCID: PMC6165668 DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.7.1753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Clinicopathological Findings of Patints with Occupational Cholangiocarcinoma
| Patient no. | Age | Sex | Location, type, and longest diameter of cholangiocarcinoma (tumor no.) | Treatment | Pathological diagnosis of the main lesion (tumor no.) | BilIN- 2/3 | IPNB without any invasion | Lymph node metastasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | M | ICC, mass-forming, 17cm (1) | Right trisectionectomy | Poorly differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma (1) | Yes | No | No |
| 2 | 40 | M | ICC, mass-for ing,1.7 cm (2a) Distal ECC, papillary, <1cm (2b) | Right hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy | Well-differntiated tubular adenocarcinoma (2a) moderately diferntiated tubularadenocarcinoma (2b)" | Yes | Yes | No |
| 3 | 38 | M | ICC, mass-forming, 2.5 cm (3) | Segmentectomy 8 | Well-differntiated tubular adenocarcinoma (3) | Yes | ND | Yes |
| 4 | 39 | M | ICC, mass-forming, 10 cm (4) | Chemotherapy | - | - | - | Yes |
| 5 | 39 | M | ICC, intraductal growth, 1.5 cm (5a) perihilar ECC, papillary, NM (5b) | Left hepatectomy, resection of extra hepatic bile duct | Invasive IPNB (5a), Well-differntiated tubular adenocarcinoma (5b) | Yes | Yes | No |
| 6 | 37 | M | Perihilar ECC, nodular,<1cm (6) | Chemotherapy | - | - | - | Yes |
| 7 | 39 | M | ICC, intraductal growth, <1 cm (7) | Left hepatectomy, segmentectomy 7 | Invasive IPNB (7) | Yes | Yes | No |
| 8 | 31 | M | ICC, mass-forming, 2.1 cm (8) | Right hepatectomy, resection of extra hepatic bile duct | Moderately differntiated papillary adenocarcinoma (8) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 9_1 | 34 | M | ICC, intraductal growth, 1.5 cm (9a) | Extended left hepatectomy | Invasive IPNB (9a) | Yes | Yes | No |
| 9_2 | 36 | M | Distal ECC, papillaru, <1 cm (9b) | Resection of extra hepatic bile duct S8 partial hepatectomy" | Invasive IPNB (9b) | Yes | Yes | No |
| 9_3 | 37 | M | ICC, mass-forming, 2.5 cm (9c) | S6 and S7 partial hepatectomy | Moderately differntiated tubular adenocarcinoma (9c) | Yes | ND | No |
| 10 | 48 | M | Distal ECC, diffusely infiltrating, NM (10) | Pancreaticodusodenetomy | Moderately differntiated tubular adenocarcinoma (10) | ND | ND | Yes |
ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; ECC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; <1 cm, diameter less than 1 cm; NM, diameter could not be determined because intraepithelial cancerous spread could not be measured on macroscopic examination; BilIN, biliary intraepithelial neoplasia; IPNB, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct; ND, not determined. Patient no. 9 is classified and defined as follows, 9-1) at the first surgery, 9-2) at the second surgery, and 9-3) at the third surgery.
Abnormal Marrow Uptake on Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients with Occupational Cholangiocarcinoma
| Patient no. | Turmor no. | Main lesion (SUVmax) | Metastatic lymph nodes (SUVmax) | BilIN-2/3 (SUVmax) | IPNB without any invasion (SUVmax) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Positive (11) | - | Negative | - |
| 2 | 2a | Negative | - | Negative | Negative |
| 2b | Negative | ||||
| 3 | 3 | Positive (5.8) | - | Negative | NA |
| 4 | 4 | Positive (4.0) | Positive(5.0) | NA | NA |
| 5 | 5a | Positive (4.1) | - | Negative | Negative |
| 5b | Negative | ||||
| 6 | 6 | Negative | Positive(14.2) | NA | NA |
| 7 | 7 | Negative | - | Negative | Negative |
| 8 | 8 | Positive (2.9) | Positive(3.8) | Negative | Negative |
| 9_1 | 9a | Positive (3.8) | - | Negative | Negative |
| 9_2 | 9b | Negative | - | Negative | Negative |
| 9_3 | 9c | Positive (5.8) | - | Negative | NA |
| 10 | 10 | Positive (4.8) | Positive(4.7) | NA | NA |
SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; NA, not available; (-), not present; BiLLN, biliary intaepithelial neoplasia; IPNB, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. patient no. 9 is classified and defined as follows, 9-1) at the first surgery, 9-2) at the second surgery, and 9-3)at the third surgery
Figure 1Distal Side of an Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patient no. 10. In patient no. 10, the distal side of an extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (tumor no. 10) (a, arrow) and lymph node metastasis (b, arrow) show abnormal marrow uptake on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients with Occupational Cholangiocarcinoma
| Main lesion | Lymph node metastasis | BilIN-2/3 | IPNB without any invasion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 53.1% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Specificity | 93.3% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
BiIIN, biliary intraepithelial neoplasia; IPNB, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct
Figure 2Biliary Intraepithelial Neoplasia (BilIN) and Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct (IPNB) in Patient no. 7. In patient no. 7, BilIN-3 (b) (Kinoshita et al., 2016) and IPNB lesions without any invasion (c) (Kinoshita et al., 2016) in the lateral segment of the liver are not detected on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging (a, arrow).
Figure 3Invasive Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct (IPNB) in Patient no. 9. In patient no. 9 at the first operation, an invasive IPNB (a) (Kinoshita et al., 2016) in segment 4 (tumor no. 9a) is detected with abnormal marrow uptake on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (b, arrow).