Literature DB >> 30048790

Craniectomy and Craniotomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Michael L Kelly1, Berje Shammassian2, Mary Jo Roach3, Charles Thomas3, Amy K Wagner4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the comprehensive long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after craniectomy (CE) and craniotomy (CO) in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
METHODS: Information on all individuals with TBI who had undergone CE or CO were extracted from the TBI Model Systems database from 2002 to 2012. A 1:1 propensity matching with replacement technique was used to balance the baseline characteristics across groups. The matched sample was analyzed for outcomes during hospitalization, acute rehabilitation, and ≤2 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 1470 individuals who had undergone CE or CO. Individuals undergoing CE compared with CO demonstrated a longer length of stay in the hospital (median, 22 vs. 18 days; P < 0.0001) and acute rehabilitation (median 26 vs. 21 days; P < 0.0001). Individuals with CE had required rehospitalization more often by the 1-year follow-up point (39% vs. 25%; P < 0.0001) for reasons other than cranioplasty, including seizures (12% vs. 8%; P < 0.0001), neurologic events (i.e., hydrocephalus; 9% vs. 4%; P < 0.0001), and infections (10% vs 6%; P < 0.0001). Individuals with CE had significantly greater impairment using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, required more supervision, and were less likely to be employed at 1 and 2 years after TBI. No difference was observed in the satisfaction with life scale scores at 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier mortality estimates at 1 and 2 years showed no differences between the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.57; P = 0.4).
CONCLUSION: In a matched cohort, individuals undergoing CE compared with CO after TBI had a longer length of stay, decreased functional status, and more rehospitalizations. The survival at 2 years and the satisfaction with life scale scores were similar.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome measures; Rehabilitation; Surgery; TBI model systems; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30048790     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  3 in total

1.  Identification of Prognostic Factors in Surgically Treated Patients with Acute Epidural Hematoma.

Authors:  Koki Onodera; Tomoya Kamide; Tatsuki Kimura; Shinya Tabata; Toshiki Ikeda; Yuichiro Kikkawa; Hiroki Kurita
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  Decompressive Craniectomy vs. Craniotomy Only for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity-Matched Study of Long-Term Outcomes in Neuropsychology.

Authors:  Zhengqian Guo; Wantao Ding; Dan Cao; Yong Chen; Jian Chen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: A Review of Published Research.

Authors:  Samantha Tso; Ashirbani Saha; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.