Literature DB >> 30048659

Orientation information in encoding facial expressions.

Deyue Yu1, Andrea Chai2, Susana T L Chung2.   

Abstract

Previous research showed that we use different regions of a face to categorize different facial expressions, e.g. mouth region for identifying happy faces; eyebrows, eyes and upper part of nose for identifying angry faces. These findings imply that the spatial information along or close to the horizontal orientation might be more useful than others for facial expression recognition. In this study, we examined how the performance for recognizing facial expression depends on the spatial information along different orientations, and whether the pixel-level differences in the face images could account for subjects' performance. Four facial expressions-angry, fearful, happy and sad-were tested. An orientation filter (bandwidth = 23°) was applied to restrict information within the face images, with the center of the filter ranged from 0° (horizontal) to 150° in steps of 30°. Accuracy for recognizing facial expression was measured for an unfiltered and the six filtered conditions. For all four facial expressions, recognition performance (normalized d') was virtually identical for filter orientations of -30°, horizontal and 30°, and declined systematically as the filter orientation approached vertical. The information contained in mouth and eye regions is a significant predictor for subject's response (based on the confusion patterns). We conclude that young adults with normal vision categorizes facial expression most effectively based on the spatial information around the horizontal orientation which captures primary changes of facial features across expressions. Across all spatial orientations, the information contained in mouth and eye regions contributes significantly to facial expression categorization.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facial expression recognition; Psychophysics; Spatial vision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30048659      PMCID: PMC6139277          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  Configural information in facial expression perception.

Authors:  A J Calder; A W Young; J Keane; M Dean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier; Jorge L Armony; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Transmitting and decoding facial expressions.

Authors:  Marie L Smith; Garrison W Cottrell; Frédéric Gosselin; Philippe G Schyns
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

4.  Featural evaluation, integration, and judgment of facial affect.

Authors:  J W Ellison; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations.

Authors:  P G Schyns; A Oliva
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-01-01

7.  Critical orientation for face identification in central vision loss.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Orientation biases for facial emotion recognition during childhood and adulthood.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Carol Huynh; Alyson Saville; Jamie Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-08-04

9.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08

10.  The orientation selectivity of face identification.

Authors:  Valerie Goffaux; John A Greenwood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Orientation Information in Encoding Facial Expressions for People With Central Vision Loss.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Fixed or flexible? Orientation preference in identity and gaze processing in humans.

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.