Literature DB >> 30048307

Is it Time to Abandon the Milan Criteria?: Results of a Bicoastal US Collaboration to Redefine Hepatocellular Carcinoma Liver Transplantation Selection Policies.

Karim J Halazun1,2, Parissa Tabrizian3, Marc Najjar2, Sander Florman3, Myron Schwartz3, Fabrizio Michelassi1, Benjamin Samstein1,2, Robert S Brown1,2,4, Jean C Emond1,2, Ronald W Busuttil5, Vatche G Agopian5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: European liver transplant (LT) centers have moved away from using the Milan Criteria (MC) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient selection, turning to models including tumor biological indices, namely alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). We present the first US model to incorporate an AFP response (AFP-R), with comparisons to MC and French-AFP models (F-AFP).
METHODS: AFP-R was measured as differences between maximum and final pre-LT AFP in HCC patients undergoing LT at 3 US centers (2001 to 2013). Cox and competing risk-regression analyses identified predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS).
RESULTS: Of 1450 patients, 235 (16.2%) were outside MC. Tumor size, number, and AFP-R were independent predictors of RFS and were assigned weighted points based on Cox-regression analysis. An AFP-R consistently < 200 ng/mL predicted the best outcome. A 3-tiered competing-risk RFS model, the New York/California (NYCA) score, was developed, accurately discriminating between groups (P < 0.001), and correlating with overall survival (P < 0.001). Two hundred one of 235 patients outside MC (85.5%) would be recategorized into NYCA low/acceptable-risk groups. The c-statistic for our NYCA score is 0.731 compared with 0.613 for MC and 0.658 for F-AFP (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Incorporation of AFP-R into HCC selection criteria allows for MC expansion. As United Network for Organ Sharing considers adding AFP to selection algorithms, the NYCA score provides an objective, user-friendly tool for centers to appropriately risk-stratify patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30048307     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: pushing the boundaries.

Authors:  Joanne M O'Rourke; Shishir Shetty; Tahir Shah; M Thamara P R Perera
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-02

2.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: alpha-fetoprotein should be included in selection criteria.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Pommergaard
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-11

Review 3.  Assessing Competing Risks for Death Following Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Carlo Sposito; Alessandro Cucchetti; Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Striving for decreased post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence without excluding potentially curable patients: the utility of tumor biology.

Authors:  Russell Evan Rosenblatt; Karim Jarir Halazun
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Robin Kate Kelley; Augusto Villanueva; Amit G Singal; Eli Pikarsky; Sasan Roayaie; Riccardo Lencioni; Kazuhiko Koike; Jessica Zucman-Rossi; Richard S Finn
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 6.  [Resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  Daniel Seehofer; Robert Sucher; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Different Models to Predict the Risk of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Setting of Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Helena Degroote; Anja Geerts; Xavier Verhelst; Hans Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Mortality after Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study from the European Liver Transplant Registry.

Authors:  Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Andreas Arendtsen Rostved; René Adam; Allan Rasmussen; Mauro Salizzoni; Miguel Angel Gómez Bravo; Daniel Cherqui; Paolo De Simone; Pauline Houssel-Debry; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Olivier Soubrane; Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas; Joan Fabregat Prous; Antonio D Pinna; John O'Grady; Vincent Karam; Christophe Duvoux; Lau Caspar Thygesen
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using the LiTES-HCC score.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Alejandro Mantero; Craig Newcomb; Cindy Delgado; Kimberly A Forde; David E Kaplan; Binu John; Nadine Nuchovich; Barbara Dominguez; Ezekiel Emanuel; Peter P Reese
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 30.083

10.  Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-Life Comparison of Milan Criteria and AFP Model.

Authors:  Bleuenn Brusset; Jerome Dumortier; Daniel Cherqui; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Ludivine Chapron; Jean-Louis Quesada; Sylvie Radenne; Didier Samuel; Francis Navarro; Sebastien Dharancy; Thomas Decaens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.