Literature DB >> 30048016

Restaging Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Additional Treatment Decisions: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Alessandro Vitale1, Fabio Farinati1, Giulia Noaro1, Patrizia Burra1, Timothy M Pawlik2, Laura Bucci3, Edoardo G Giannini4, Chiara Faggiano5, Francesca Ciccarese6, Gian Lodovico Rapaccini7, Maria Di Marco8, Eugenio Caturelli9, Marco Zoli5, Franco Borzio10, Rodolfo Sacco11, Giuseppe Cabibbo12, Roberto Virdone13, Fabio Marra14, Martina Felder15, Filomena Morisco16, Luisa Benvegnù17, Antonio Gasbarrini18, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni19, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi20, Andrea Olivani21, Alberto Masotto22, Gerardo Nardone23, Antonio Colecchia24, Fabio Fornari25, Massimo Marignani26, Susanna Vicari27, Emanuela Bortolini28, Raffaele Cozzolongo29, Alessandro Grasso30, Camillo Aliberti31, Mauro Bernardi3, Anna Chiara Frigo32, Mauro Borzio33, Franco Trevisani3, Umberto Cillo1.   

Abstract

Prognostic assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the time of diagnosis remains controversial and becomes even more complex at the time of restaging when new variables need to be considered. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prognostic utility of restaging patients before proceeding with additional therapies for HCC. Two independent Italian prospective databases were used to identify 1,196 (training cohort) and 648 (validation cohort) consecutive patients with HCC treated over the same study period (2008-2015) who had complete restaging before decisions about additional therapies. The performance of the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) prognostic score at restaging was compared with that of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, Hong Kong Liver Cancer, and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program systems. A multivariable Cox survival analysis was performed to identify baseline, restaging, or dynamic variables that were able to improve the predictive performance of the prognostic systems. At restaging, 35.3% of patients maintained stable disease; most patients were either down-staged by treatment (27.2%) or had disease progression (37.5%). The ITA.LI.CA scoring system at restaging demonstrated the best prognostic performance in both the training and validation cohorts (c-index 0.707 and 0.722, respectively) among all systems examined. On multivariable analysis, several variables improved the prognostic ability of the ITA.LI.CA score at restaging, including progressive disease after the first treatment, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at restaging, and choice of nonsurgical treatment as additional therapy. A new ITA.LI.CA restaging model was created that demonstrated high discriminative power in both the training and validation cohorts (c-index 0.753 and 0.745, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Although the ITA.LI.CA score demonstrated the best prognostic performance at restaging, other variables should be considered to improve the prognostic assessment of patients at the time of deciding additional therapies for HCC.
© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30048016     DOI: 10.1002/hep.30185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  7 in total

1.  Ramucirumab as a second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: reaching out further to patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein.

Authors:  Edoardo G Giannini; Franco Trevisani
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Sarcopenia in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  Abhilash Perisetti; Hemant Goyal; Rachana Yendala; Saurabh Chandan; Benjamin Tharian; Ragesh Babu Thandassery
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A New Prognostic Algorithm Predicting HCC Recurrence in Patients With Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B Who Received PA-TACE.

Authors:  Shuyang Hu; Wei Gan; Liang Qiao; Cheng Ye; Demin Wu; Boyi Liao; Xiaoyu Yang; Xiaoqing Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Clinical Practice: Temporal Trends and Survival Outcomes of an Iterative Treatment.

Authors:  Filippo Pelizzaro; Selion Haxhi; Barbara Penzo; Alessandro Vitale; Edoardo G Giannini; Vito Sansone; Gian Ludovico Rapaccini; Maria Di Marco; Eugenio Caturelli; Donatella Magalotti; Rodolfo Sacco; Ciro Celsa; Claudia Campani; Andrea Mega; Maria Guarino; Antonio Gasbarrini; Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Andrea Olivani; Alberto Masotto; Gerardo Nardone; Giovanni Raimondo; Francesco Azzaroli; Gianpaolo Vidili; Maurizia Rossana Brunetto; Franco Trevisani; Fabio Farinati
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Comment on: "A review on radiofrequency, microwave and high-intensity focused ultrasound ablations for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis".

Authors:  Michele Finotti; Maurizio Romano; Marco Brizzolari; Michele Scopelliti; Giacomo Zanus
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 8.265

6.  Clinical significance of radiotherapy before and/or during nivolumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong Il Yu; Su Jin Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Ho Yeong Lim; Seung Woon Paik; Gyu Sang Yoo; Changhoon Choi; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Clinical impact of sarcopenia assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing treatments.

Authors:  Giovanni Marasco; Matteo Serenari; Matteo Renzulli; Luigina Vanessa Alemanni; Benedetta Rossini; Irene Pettinari; Elton Dajti; Federico Ravaioli; Rita Golfieri; Matteo Cescon; Davide Festi; Antonio Colecchia
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 7.527

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.