| Literature DB >> 30048016 |
Alessandro Vitale1, Fabio Farinati1, Giulia Noaro1, Patrizia Burra1, Timothy M Pawlik2, Laura Bucci3, Edoardo G Giannini4, Chiara Faggiano5, Francesca Ciccarese6, Gian Lodovico Rapaccini7, Maria Di Marco8, Eugenio Caturelli9, Marco Zoli5, Franco Borzio10, Rodolfo Sacco11, Giuseppe Cabibbo12, Roberto Virdone13, Fabio Marra14, Martina Felder15, Filomena Morisco16, Luisa Benvegnù17, Antonio Gasbarrini18, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni19, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi20, Andrea Olivani21, Alberto Masotto22, Gerardo Nardone23, Antonio Colecchia24, Fabio Fornari25, Massimo Marignani26, Susanna Vicari27, Emanuela Bortolini28, Raffaele Cozzolongo29, Alessandro Grasso30, Camillo Aliberti31, Mauro Bernardi3, Anna Chiara Frigo32, Mauro Borzio33, Franco Trevisani3, Umberto Cillo1.
Abstract
Prognostic assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the time of diagnosis remains controversial and becomes even more complex at the time of restaging when new variables need to be considered. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prognostic utility of restaging patients before proceeding with additional therapies for HCC. Two independent Italian prospective databases were used to identify 1,196 (training cohort) and 648 (validation cohort) consecutive patients with HCC treated over the same study period (2008-2015) who had complete restaging before decisions about additional therapies. The performance of the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) prognostic score at restaging was compared with that of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, Hong Kong Liver Cancer, and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program systems. A multivariable Cox survival analysis was performed to identify baseline, restaging, or dynamic variables that were able to improve the predictive performance of the prognostic systems. At restaging, 35.3% of patients maintained stable disease; most patients were either down-staged by treatment (27.2%) or had disease progression (37.5%). The ITA.LI.CA scoring system at restaging demonstrated the best prognostic performance in both the training and validation cohorts (c-index 0.707 and 0.722, respectively) among all systems examined. On multivariable analysis, several variables improved the prognostic ability of the ITA.LI.CA score at restaging, including progressive disease after the first treatment, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at restaging, and choice of nonsurgical treatment as additional therapy. A new ITA.LI.CA restaging model was created that demonstrated high discriminative power in both the training and validation cohorts (c-index 0.753 and 0.745, respectively).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30048016 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepatology ISSN: 0270-9139 Impact factor: 17.425