| Literature DB >> 30047516 |
Shinji Homma1,2.
Abstract
Electrogastrograms (EGGs) were recorded from 16 locations on the thoraco-abdominal surface to find the maximum absolute power foci during rest (RAP) and the maximum ratio of the % content during the mirror drawing test (MDT) compared to that during rest (%C-MDT/R) for both the 3 cpm (2.4-4.9) and 6 cpm (5.0-7.4) groups. The maximum foci were obtained from control subjects and those who received gastro-intestinal surgery via total gastrectomy (TG), distal gastrectomy (DG), and total esophagectomy with colonic replacement (CR). The control mean of the infraumbilical channels 10-16 (I) expressed as %C-MDT/R of the 3 cpm group was higher than the mean of the supraumbilical channels 1-9 (S) (I>S, P<0.001). The maximum focus of the 3-cpm %C-MDT/R was in the left umbilical area, while that of the 6-cpm %C-MDT/R was found bilaterally in the right epigastric and left umbilical areas, interposed by the lower %C-MDT/R gastric area. Therefore, the presence of gastric EGG inhibition and colonic facilitation are suggested to occur during MDT. In TG and DG, the foci of the %C-MDT/R in the 3-cpm group were located bilaterally in the right epigastric and left umbilical areas. The shifts of foci suggest colonic EGG facilitation. The mean S of the 3-cpm group was significantly higher than the mean I with CR (S>I, P<0.05). The maximum foci of the 3- and 6-cpm groups were in the epigastrium. These results suggest colonic EGG facilitation in the epigastrium, as the stomach has been removed and the original gastric location is instead occupied by the transverse colon in CR.Entities:
Keywords: electrogastrogram (EGG); gastrointestinal surgery; mirror drawing test (MDT); topographic EGG map
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30047516 PMCID: PMC6060278 DOI: 10.1540/jsmr.54.43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Smooth Muscle Res ISSN: 0916-8737
Fig. 1.Schematic location of 16 EGG electrodes (filled circles) on the body surface based on the xiphoid process, costal arch, and iliac line. X indicates the navel. The filled circles indicate the average location of each electrode. The Xmax was 27 cm and Ymax was 32 cm in this study.
Comparison of %C-MDT/R (mean ± SE) between S and I
| Control | TG | TC | DG | CR | |
| 3 cpm, S | 1.0 ± 0.09 | 1.0 ± 0.017 | 1.2 ± 0.067 | 1.10 ± 0.027 | 1.70 ± 0.11 |
| 3 cpm, I | 1.2 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.032 | 1.1 ± 0.025 | 1.07 ± 0.06 | 1.18 ± 0.064 |
| S/I | I>S, | NS | NS | NS | S>I, |
| 6 cpm, S | 1.0 ± 0.04 | 0.87 ± 0.037 | 0.99 ± 0.035 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 1.30 ± 0.15 |
| 6 cpm, I | 1.0 ± 0.011 | 0.93 ± 0.071 | 1.1 ± 0.028 | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 1.00 ± 0.071 |
| S/I | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
S, supraumbilical channels (ch. 1-9); I, infraumbilical channels (ch. 10-16).
%C-MDT/R (mean ± SE) in 3-cpm group (2.4–4.9 cpm)
| C | TG | TC | DG | CR | |
| ch5 | 0.90 ± 0.054 (a) | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 0.99 ± 0.085 | 1.01 ± 0.19 | 1.49 ± 0.27 |
| ch8 | 1.01 ± 0.066 (b) | 1.02 ± 0.18 | 1.25 ± 0.15 (j) | 1.09 ± 0.14 | 2.20 ± 1.14 |
| ch10 | 1.11 ± 0.071 (c) | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 1.15 ± 0.19 | 0.96 ± 0.16 | 0.95 ± 0.11 |
| ch11 | 1.36 ± 0.14 (d) | 1.03 ± 0.18 | 0.95 ± 0.13 | 1.32 ± 0.19 | 1.25 ± 0.19 |
| ch12 | 1.22 ± 0.09 (e) | 1.04 ± 0.09 | 1.00 ± 0.17 | 1.16 ± 0.14 | 1.26 ± 0.37 |
| ch13 | 1.21 ± 0.074 (f) | 1.04 ± 0.20 | 1.10 ± 0.14 (k) | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 0.90 ± 0.12 |
| ch14 | 1.30 ± 0.12 (g) | 1.02 ± 0.14 | 1.09 ± 0.076 | 1.24 ± 0.12 | 1.35 ± 0.20 |
| ch15 | 1.17 ± 0.076 (h) | 0.95 ± 0.12 | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 1.23 ± 0.24 |
| ch16 | 1.19 ± 0.092 (i) | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 1.10 ± 0.12 | 1.05 ± 0.12 | 1.35 ± 0.15 |
C, control; TG, total gastrectomy; TC, total colectomy; DG, distal gastrectomy; CR, total esophagectomy with colonic replacement. Channels 1-9 were defined as S (supraumbilical) and channels 10-16 as I (infraumbilical). For the control channels, the infraumbilical MDT responses were significantly higher than the epigastric (ch. 5 and 8) MDT ones (Ci>Cs); P<0.05 between a–i, b–e, P<0.01 between a–d, a–f, a–g, a–h. For the TC (total colectomy) channels, the infraumbilical MDT response was lower than that of the epigastric ones; P<0.05 between j–k.
%C-MDT/R (mean ± SE) in 6-cpm group (5.0–7.4 cpm)
| C | TG | TC | DG | CR | |
| ch5 | 0.89 ± 0.060 | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 1.02 ± 0.17 | 1.27 ± 0.27 | 2.56 ± 0.94 |
| ch8 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 0.98 ± 0.19 | 0.97 ± 0.11 | 1.15 ± 0.24 | 1.10 ± 0.31 |
| ch10 | 1.04 ± 0.089 | 0.81 ± 0.16 | 1.11 ± 0.13 | 1.21 ± 0.29 | 0.65 ± 0.08 |
| ch11 | 1.03 ± 0.091 | 0.79 ± 0.15 | 1.08 ± 0.13 | 1.06 ± 0.22 | 0.89 ± 0.18 |
| ch12 | 0.9 ± 0.074 | 0.91 ± 0.12 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 1.24 ± 0.31 | 1.11 ± 0.35 |
| ch13 | 1.03 ± 0.084 | 1.38 ± 0.39 | 0.99 ± 0.16 | 1.35 ± 0.44 | 0.88 ± 0.09 |
| ch14 | 0.99 ± 0.081 | 1.02 ± 0.16 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 1.15 ± 0.27 | 1.20 ± 0.25 |
| ch15 | 1.04 ± 0.073 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 1.20 ± 0.14 | 1.00 ± 0.18 | 1.05 ± 0.28 |
| ch16 | 1.04 ± 0.077 | 0.85 ± 0.12 | 1.10 ± 0.16 | 1.07 ± 0.24 | 1.25 ± 0.16 |
In control and operated subjects, the MDT infraumbilical 6-cpm responses were not significantly higher than the MDT the epigastric 6-cpm responses.
Fig. 2.Topographic electrogastrographic maps of controls subjects [1] and of subjects who received total gastrectomy (TG) [2] in A and those of subjects who received total colectomy (TC) [3], distal gastrectomy (DG) [4] and total esophagectomy plus colonic replacement (CR) [5] in B.