Literature DB >> 30047306

Appraising Qualitative Research for Evidence Syntheses: A Compendium of Quality Appraisal Tools.

Umair Majid1, Meredith Vanstone1.   

Abstract

As the movement toward evidence-based health policy continues to emphasize the importance of including patient and public perspectives, syntheses of qualitative health research are becoming more common. In response to the focus on independent assessments of rigor in these knowledge products, over 100 appraisal tools for assessing the quality of qualitative research have been developed. The variety of appraisal tools exhibit diverse methods and purposes, reflecting the lack of consensus as to what constitutes appropriate quality criteria for qualitative research. It is a daunting task for those without deep familiarity of the field to choose the best appraisal tool for their purpose. This article provides a description of the structure, content, and objectives of existing appraisal tools for those wanting to evaluate primary qualitative research for a qualitative evidence synthesis. We then discuss common features of appraisal tools and examine their implications for evidence synthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appraisal tool; meta-synthesis; qualitative evidence synthesis; quality appraisal; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30047306     DOI: 10.1177/1049732318785358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  22 in total

1.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 2.  "All the fun stuff, the teachers say, 'that's dangerous!'" Hearing from children on safety and risk in active play in schools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alethea Jerebine; Katie Fitton-Davies; Natalie Lander; Emma L J Eyre; Michael J Duncan; Lisa M Barnett
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 8.915

3.  Participant perspectives of automated short messaging service interventions to promote physical activity: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  J Stefanus Grobler; Verna Stavric; Nicola L Saywell
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Implementation and Effectiveness of Integrating Palliative Care Into Ambulatory Care of Noncancer Serious Chronic Illness: Mixed Methods Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linda C Chyr; Lyndsay DeGroot; Julie M Waldfogel; Susan M Hannum; Danetta H Sloan; Valerie T Cotter; Allen Zhang; JaAlah-Ai Heughan; Renee F Wilson; Karen A Robinson; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.707

5.  Coping and growing in dilemma: Clinical work experience of front-line nurses in Wuhan during the early stage of COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Fen Xu; Ju-Ping Tang; Sha Lu; Hong-Wei Fang; Lili Dong; Yun-Xian Zhou
Journal:  Jpn J Nurs Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.691

6.  Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool.

Authors:  Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas; Claire Glenton; Andrew Booth; Jane Noyes; Simon Lewin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Supporting the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Ahmad Firas Khalid; John N Lavis; Fadi El-Jardali; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-02-18

8.  Meta-ethnography in healthcare research: a guide to using a meta-ethnographic approach for literature synthesis.

Authors:  Raabia Sattar; Rebecca Lawton; Maria Panagioti; Judith Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Decision-making for the infant sleep environment among families with children considered to be at risk of sudden unexpected death in infancy: a systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Anna Pease; Joanna J Garstang; Catherine Ellis; Debbie Watson; Jenny Ingram; Christie Cabral; Peter S Blair; Peter J Fleming
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Motherhood and decision-making among women living with HIV in developed countries: a systematic review with qualitative research synthesis.

Authors:  Ariadna Huertas-Zurriaga; Patrick A Palmieri; Joan E Edwards; Sandra K Cesario; Sergio Alonso-Fernandez; Lidia Pardell-Dominguez; Karen A Dominguez-Cancino; Juan M Leyva-Moral
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.