Literature DB >> 30046802

Characteristics and Skin Cancer Risk Behaviors of Adult Sunless Tanners in the United States.

Melissa Dodds1, Sarah T Arron2, Eleni Linos2, Ingrid Polcari1, Matthew D Mansh1.   

Abstract

Importance: Incidence rates of nonmelanoma and melanoma skin cancers are increasing rapidly in the United States likely because of increased UV light exposure. Sunless tanning is a safe alternative to achieve tanned skin that might help reduce skin cancer incidence by deterring risky behaviors. However, limited data exist on the characteristics and associated skin cancer risk behaviors of sunless tanners in the United States. Objective: To assess the demographic characteristics and skin cancer risk behaviors of sunless tanners among adults in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study used data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey, a population-based survey of the US noninstitutionalized civilian population. Participants included 27 353 men and women 18 years or older. Main Outcome and Measures: Participant demographics and skin cancer risk behaviors, including indoor tanning, skin cancer screening, sunburn, and sun protection behaviors.
Results: Of the 27 353 adults (representative of more than 198 million US adults; mean [SE] age, 46.0 [0.2] years) studied, 6.4% (SE, 0.2%) reported sunless tanning. Factors associated with sunless tanning included being young, female, non-Hispanic white, college educated, nonobese, and sun sensitive, living in the western United States, and having a family history of skin cancer. Sunless tanners were more likely to report indoor tanning (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR], 3.77; 95% CI, 3.19-4.43; P < .001), recent sunburn (aPOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.31-1.83; P < .001), use of sunscreen (β = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28; P < .001), and having had a full-body skin examination (aPOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.51-2.08; P < .001) but less likely to seek shade (β = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.04; P = .001) or use protective clothing when outdoors (long pants: β = -0.18; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.11; P < .001; long sleeves: β = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.03; P = .01). Among indoor tanners, sunless tanners compared with those who did not sunless tan reported increased frequency of indoor tanning (mean [SE], 19.2 [1.9] vs 14.9 [1.2] sessions in the past 12 months; P = .04) but no differences in other skin cancer risk behaviors. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that sunless tanning is associated with risky skin cancer-related behaviors. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether sunless tanning changes UV exposure behaviors to better determine whether sunless tanning represents an effective public health strategy to reduce rates of skin cancer in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30046802      PMCID: PMC6143043          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  12 in total

1.  Use of artificial tanning products among young adults.

Authors:  Katie Brooks; Daniel Brooks; Zeina Dajani; Susan M Swetter; Erin Powers; Sherry Pagoto; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Prevalence of sunless tanning product use and related behaviors among adults in the United States: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Stryker; Amy L Yaroch; Richard P Moser; Audie Atienza; Karen Glanz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Conventional sunscreen application does not lead to sufficient body coverage.

Authors:  Z Jovanovic; T Schornstein; A Sutor; G Neufang; R Hagens
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.970

4.  U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. 2011.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Body-tanning attitudes among female college students.

Authors:  Jeong-Ju Yoo; Won-Moo Hur
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2014-04

6.  Sun protective behaviors and vitamin D levels in the US population: NHANES 2003-2006.

Authors:  Eleni Linos; Elizabeth Keiser; Matthew Kanzler; Kristin L Sainani; Wayne Lee; Eric Vittinghoff; Mary-Margaret Chren; Jean Y Tang
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  The sunless study: a beach randomized trial of a skin cancer prevention intervention promoting sunless tanning.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica Oleski; Jamie S Bodenlos; Yunsheng Ma
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-09

8.  Predictors of sun-related behaviors among young women: comparisons between outdoor tanners, fake tanners, and tan avoiders.

Authors:  Ashley K Day; Melissa Oxlad; Rachel M Roberts
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2013

9.  Association of Indoor Tanning Frequency With Risky Sun Protection Practices and Skin Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Alexander H Fischer; Timothy S Wang; Gayane Yenokyan; Sewon Kang; Anna L Chien
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 10.282

10.  Association of Skin Cancer and Indoor Tanning in Sexual Minority Men and Women.

Authors:  Matthew Mansh; Kenneth A Katz; Eleni Linos; Mary-Margaret Chren; Sarah Arron
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 10.282

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cross-sectional study of sex differences in psychosocial quality of life of long-term melanoma survivors.

Authors:  Rachel I Vogel; Broderick Yoerg; Patricia I Jewett; Nathan Rubin; Megan Olson; Ashley E Stenzel; Rehana L Ahmed; DeAnn Lazovich
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  Canadian Burden of Skin Disease From 1990 to 2017: Results From the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Alanna C Bridgman; Christina Fitzmaurice; Robert P Dellavalle; Chante Karimkhani Aksut; Ayman Grada; Mohsen Naghavi; Navid Manafi; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Ranjani Somayaji; Aaron M Drucker
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.092

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.