Yan-Ni Yan1, Ya-Xing Wang2, Yan Yang3, Liang Xu2, Jie Xu2, Qian Wang1, Jing-Yan Yang1, Wen-Jia Zhou1, Wen-Bin Wei1, Jost B Jonas2,4. 1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China. 2. Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China. 3. Beijing Aier-Intech Eye Hospital, Beijing 100730, China. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the Ruprecht-Karls-University, Seegartenklinik Heidelberg 68167, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: To access the 10-year fundus tessellation progression in patients with retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: The Beijing Eye Study 2001/2011 is a population-based longitudinal study. The study participants underwent a detailed physical and ophthalmic examination. Degree of fundus tessellation was graded by using fundus photographs of the macula and optic disc. Progression of fundus tessellation was calculated by fundus tessellation degree of 2011 minus degree of 2001. Fundus photographs were used for assessment of retinal vein occlusion. RESULTS: The Beijing Eye Study included 4403 subjects in 2001, 3468 subjects was repeated in 2011. Assessment of retinal vein obstruction and fundus tessellation progression were available for 2462 subjects (71.0%), with 66 subjects fulfilled the diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion. Of the 66 participants, 59 participants with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion, 5 participants with unilateral central retinal vein occlusion, 1 participant with bilateral branch retinal vein occlusion, and 1 participant with branch retinal vein occlusion in one eye and central retinal vein occlusion in the other eye. Mean degree of peripapillary fundus tessellation progression were significantly higher in the whole retinal vein occlusion group (0.33±0.39, P<0.001), central retinal vein occlusion group (0.71±0.8, P=0.025) and branch retinal vein occlusion group (0.29±0.34, P=0.006) than the control group (0.20±0.26). After adjustment for age, prevalence of tilted disc, change of best corrected visual acuity, axial length, progression of peripapillary fundus tessellation was associated with the presence of retinal vein occlusion (P=0.004; regression coefficient B, 0.094; 95%CI, 0.029, 0.158; standardized coefficient B, 0.056). As a corollary, after adjusting for smoking duration, systolic blood pressure, anterior corneal curvature, prevalence of RVO was associated with more peripapillary fundus tessellation progression (P<0.001; regression coefficient B: 1.257; OR: 3.517; 95%CI: 1.777, 6.958). CONCLUSION: Peripapillary fundus tessellation progresses faster in individuals with retinal vein occlusion. This may reflect the thinning and hypoperfusion of choroid in patients with retinal vein occlusion.
AIM: To access the 10-year fundus tessellation progression in patients with retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: The Beijing Eye Study 2001/2011 is a population-based longitudinal study. The study participants underwent a detailed physical and ophthalmic examination. Degree of fundus tessellation was graded by using fundus photographs of the macula and optic disc. Progression of fundus tessellation was calculated by fundus tessellation degree of 2011 minus degree of 2001. Fundus photographs were used for assessment of retinal vein occlusion. RESULTS: The Beijing Eye Study included 4403 subjects in 2001, 3468 subjects was repeated in 2011. Assessment of retinal vein obstruction and fundus tessellation progression were available for 2462 subjects (71.0%), with 66 subjects fulfilled the diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion. Of the 66 participants, 59 participants with unilateral branch retinal vein occlusion, 5 participants with unilateral central retinal vein occlusion, 1 participant with bilateral branch retinal vein occlusion, and 1 participant with branch retinal vein occlusion in one eye and central retinal vein occlusion in the other eye. Mean degree of peripapillary fundus tessellation progression were significantly higher in the whole retinal vein occlusion group (0.33±0.39, P<0.001), central retinal vein occlusion group (0.71±0.8, P=0.025) and branch retinal vein occlusion group (0.29±0.34, P=0.006) than the control group (0.20±0.26). After adjustment for age, prevalence of tilted disc, change of best corrected visual acuity, axial length, progression of peripapillary fundus tessellation was associated with the presence of retinal vein occlusion (P=0.004; regression coefficient B, 0.094; 95%CI, 0.029, 0.158; standardized coefficient B, 0.056). As a corollary, after adjusting for smoking duration, systolic blood pressure, anterior corneal curvature, prevalence of RVO was associated with more peripapillary fundus tessellation progression (P<0.001; regression coefficient B: 1.257; OR: 3.517; 95%CI: 1.777, 6.958). CONCLUSION: Peripapillary fundus tessellation progresses faster in individuals with retinal vein occlusion. This may reflect the thinning and hypoperfusion of choroid in patients with retinal vein occlusion.
Authors: L L Lim; N Cheung; J J Wang; F M A Islam; P Mitchell; S M Saw; T Aung; T Y Wong Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: R D Sperduto; R Hiller; E Chew; D Seigel; N Blair; T C Burton; M D Farber; E S Gragoudas; J Haller; J M Seddon; L A Yannuzzi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nadim Rayess; Ehsan Rahimy; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maria Pefkianaki; Jason Franklin; Carl D Regillo; Allen C Ho; Jason Hsu Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jing Yan Yang; Xuan Yang; Yang Li; Jie Xu; Yong Zhou; An Xin Wang; Xiang Gao; Liang Xu; Shou Ling Wu; Wen Bin Wei; Xing Quan Zhao; Jost B Jonas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 3.240