| Literature DB >> 30046331 |
Eun Sik Choi1,2, Jung Joo Yoon1,2, Byung Hyuk Han1,2, Da Hye Jeong1,2, Hye Yoom Kim1,2, You Mee Ahn1,2, So Young Eun1,2, Yun Jung Lee1,2, Dae Gill Kang1,2, Ho Sub Lee1,2.
Abstract
Samul-Tang (SMT), consisting of four medicinal herbs, is a well-known herbal prescription treating hematological disorders related symptoms. Our previous study demonstrated that SMT attenuated inflammation of vascular endothelial cells. In condition of retained vascular dysfunction, vascular inflammation is initiated and results in activation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Activated SMCs lose control of cell cycle regulation and migrate into intima, resulting in formation of atheroma. Here, we further investigated whether SMT suppresses proliferation and migration of SMCs. SMT showed antiproliferative effects on SMCs by suppressing [3H]-thymidine incorporation against TNF-α stimulation. Underlying mechanisms of antiproliferative effects were found to be resulting from cell cycle regulation. SMT downregulated expression of cyclin D1-CDK4 and cyclin E-CDK2 complexes and upregulated p21waf1/cip1 and p27kip1. SMT also suppressed migration of SMCs against TNF-α stimulation. This is thought to have resulted from suppressing MMP2 and MMP9 expressions and ROS production. In summary, SMT attenuates abnormal migration of vascular smooth muscle cells via regulating cell cycle and suppressing MMPs expression and ROS production. Our study suggests that SMT, a traditionally used herbal formula, protects vascular smooth muscle cells and might be used as an antiatherosclerotic drug.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30046331 PMCID: PMC6036829 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1024974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Effects of SMT on TNF-α stimulated SMCs proliferation. Cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or pretreatment of SMT (10, 30, and 50 μg/ml) for 30 min and incubated with 1 μCi of [3H]-thymidine. [3H]-Thymidine incorporation was used as an index of DNA synthesis. Bar represents the mean ± SEM of more than 3 independent experiments. p < 0.01 versus untreated control group. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 versus TNF-α-treated group.
Figure 2Effect of SMT on TNF-α stimulated expression of cell cycle regulators. (a) cyclin D1 and CDK4, (b) cyclin E and CDK2, and (c) p21waf1/cip1 and p27kip1. Cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or pretreatment of SMT (10, 30, and 50 μg/ml) for 30 min. Bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 versus untreated control group. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 versus TNF-α-treated group.
Figure 3Effect of SMT on TNF-α stimulated SMCs migration. Cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or pretreatment of SMT (10, 30, and 50 μg/ml) for 30 min. Microscopic photographs of all groups were captured with same magnification (40x) and scale bar indicates 500 μm.
Figure 4Effect of SMT on TNF-α stimulated SMCs secretion and expression of MMPs. Cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or pretreatment of SMT (10, 30, and 50 μg/ml) for 30 min. (a) 0.1% gelatin-containing separating gel was used to measure MMPs secretion in zymography. White bands stand for degraded gelatins by MMP9 and MMP2 secreted in cell cultured medium. (b) Protein expression of MMPs. Bar represents the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. p < 0.05 versus untreated control group. #p < 0.05 versus TNF-α-treated group.
Figure 5Effect of SMT on TNF-α stimulated SMCs ROS production was measured by (a) FACs analysis and (b) microplate reader. Cells were labeled with CM-H2DCFDA and treated with TNF-α (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or pretreatment of SMT (10, 30, and 50 μg/ml) for 30 min. N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) was used as positive control. p < 0.01 versus untreated control group. ##p < 0.01 versus TNF-α-treated group.