| Literature DB >> 30045733 |
Aitana Sogorb-Esteve1,2, María-Salud García-Ayllón1,2,3, Johan Gobom4,5, Jordi Alom2,6, Henrik Zetterberg4,5,7,8, Kaj Blennow4,5, Javier Sáez-Valero9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The disintegrin metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) is the main α-secretase acting in the non-amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid precursor protein. This study assesses whether ADAM10 is present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and whether it has potential as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30045733 PMCID: PMC6060469 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1255-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Demographic data and classic CSF biomarker levels
| Group | Age (years) | CSF Aβ42 (pg/mL) | CSF T-tau (pg/mL) | CSF P-tau (pg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NADC | 70 ± 2 [55–88] | 773 ± 29 [1010–561] | 238 ± 13 [138–365] | 36 ± 2 [21–51] | |
| AD | 71 ± 1 [55–86] | 414 ± 15* [544–251] | 689 ± 48* [1420–443] | 88 ± 5* [164–61] |
Patients were designated as NADC or AD according to CSF biomarker levels using cutoffs as described in the “Methods” section (and ref. [27]). The data represent the means ± SEM. The ranges of values for each variable are also indicated. F female; M male. *Significantly different (p < 0.001) from the NADC group
Fig. 1Different ADAM10 species are present in human CSF. a Schematic representation of ADAM10 and its domain organization, which consists of a pro-domain (Pro), a zinc-binding metalloprotease (Protease) domain, a disintegrin domain (Dis), which binds to integrin cell adhesion molecules, a cysteine-rich domain (Cys), a variable stalk region, a transmembrane (TM) domain, and a cytosolic domain (Cyto). Not drawn in scale; adapted from [29]. The potential species resulting from proteolytic removal of the prodomain that are further released from the membrane are indicated (immature form, proADAM10; mature full-length form, ADAM10f; truncated soluble form, sADAM10). The approximate localizations matching identified ADAM10 peptides in human CSF by nano-LC-MS analysis are indicated (see Additional file 1: TableS1 for additional details). b Western blot of human CSF samples from controls (non-AD) subjects, resolved with the indicated anti-ADAM10 antibodies. Arrow head indicates a non-specific band (see C). c Control CSF samples were immunoprecipitated with the ADAM10 N-terminal antibody, and precipitated proteins (IP) were immunoblotted with either ADAM10 (ectodomain) or albumin antibodies. The same CSF samples were incubated, in parallel, with a non-specific rabbit IgG and analyzed as negative controls (IP control, IPc). For the blot resolved for albumin, the unbound fraction (Unb) is also shown to demonstrated that ADAM10 antibodies is not able to pull-down albumin
Fig. 2Characterization of CSF-ADAM10 complexes by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. CSF samples (NADC) were fractionated on 5–20% sucrose density gradients. The fractions (collected from the top of each tube) were immunoblotted using the ectodomain antibody specific for a domain common to all the soluble CSF-ADAM10 species. Enzymes of known sedimentation coefficient, alkaline phosphatase (P, 6.1S; ~ 140–160 kDa), catalase (C, 11.4S; ~ 232 kDa), and β-galactosidase (G, 16.0S; ~ 540 kDa) were used as internal markers. A representative case from three independent experiments is shown
Fig. 3Decreased levels of mature ADAM10 species in AD CSF samples. a Representative blot of ADAM10 species immunoreactive to an ectodomain antibody in the CSF samples from 27 AD patients and 26 age-matched non-AD controls (NADC). Arrow head indicates a non-specific band. b Densitometric quantification of ADAM10 immunoreactivity from the 55 kDa species attributed to the mature form (ADAM10f), the truncated 50 kDa (sADAM10), and the 80 kDa immature form (proADAM10). Equal volumes of CSF were loaded in each lane and Ponceau staining served to monitor potential loading inaccuracies (none of the major bands detected by Ponceau staining displayed significant differences between groups). c The ratio derived from the immunoreactivity for the mature 50 and 55 kDa bands relative to that for the immature 80 kDa band estimated in each sample [(50 kDa + 55 kDa)/80 kDa] is also shown. Data are presented as means ± SEM: *p ≤ 0.005