OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the NVS for Brazilian Portuguese. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty adults responded to the adapted version of the NVS, the Brazilian version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (BREALD-30), ten questions of the National Functional Literacy Index (NFLI), and a questionnaire about demographic and oral health-related aspects. Statistical analysis determined the internal consistency, stability, difficulty of items, and convergent/discriminant/predictive validities of the NVS. p < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The NVS displayed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and a fair stability (ICC = 0.57; 0.39-0.70 95% CI). Seventy-two percent of participants answered the easier question (#5) correctly, whereas only 28.4% were successful in responding the most difficult question (#1). The convergent validity of the NVS was demonstrated by its significant correlation with the BREALD-30 (Rs = 0.601, p < .001) and NFLI (Rs = 0.544, p < .001). The observation of higher NVS scores among health professionals, white and more educated people confirmed the discriminant validity of the instrument. Moreover, health literacy was a significant predictor of self-reported oral health and reason for dental utilization. CONCLUSION: The NVS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to be applied in Brazilian oral health epidemiological surveys.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the NVS for Brazilian Portuguese. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty adults responded to the adapted version of the NVS, the Brazilian version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (BREALD-30), ten questions of the National Functional Literacy Index (NFLI), and a questionnaire about demographic and oral health-related aspects. Statistical analysis determined the internal consistency, stability, difficulty of items, and convergent/discriminant/predictive validities of the NVS. p < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The NVS displayed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and a fair stability (ICC = 0.57; 0.39-0.70 95% CI). Seventy-two percent of participants answered the easier question (#5) correctly, whereas only 28.4% were successful in responding the most difficult question (#1). The convergent validity of the NVS was demonstrated by its significant correlation with the BREALD-30 (Rs = 0.601, p < .001) and NFLI (Rs = 0.544, p < .001). The observation of higher NVS scores among health professionals, white and more educated people confirmed the discriminant validity of the instrument. Moreover, health literacy was a significant predictor of self-reported oral health and reason for dental utilization. CONCLUSION: The NVS demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to be applied in Brazilian oral health epidemiological surveys.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health literacy; oral health; surveys and questionnaires
Authors: Matheus Lotto; Thiago Cruvinel; Patricia E A Aguirre; Anna P Strieder; Agnes F P Cruvinel Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 2.984