Sebastian Ruetten1, Patrick Hahn1, Semih Oezdemir1, Xenophon Baraliakos2, Georgios Godolias3, Martin Komp1. 1. Center for Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology of the St. Elisabeth Group - Catholic Hospital Rhein-Ruhr, St. Anna Hospital Herne/Marien Hospital Herne University Hospital of the Ruhr University of Bochum/Marien Hospital Witten, Herne, Germany. 2. Center for Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr University of Bochum, Herne, Germany. 3. Clinic for Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; Center for Orthopedics and Traumatology of the St. Elisabeth Group - Catholic Hospital Rhein-Ruhr, St. Anna Hospital Herne/Marien Hospital Herne University Hospital of the Ruhr University of Bochum/Marien Hospital Witten, Herne, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgery for thoracic disc herniation and stenosis is comparatively rare and often demanding. The goal is to achieve sufficient decompression without manipulating the spinal cord and to minimize surgical trauma and its consequences. Individual planning and various surgical techniques and approaches are required. The key factors for selecting the technique are anatomical location, consistency of the pathology, general condition of the patient, and the surgeon's experience. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was the evaluation of the technical implementation and outcomes of a full-endoscopic uniportal technique via the extraforaminal approach in patients with symptomatic soft or calcified disc herniation of the thoracic spine, taking specific advantages and disadvantages and literature into consideration. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A center for spine surgery and pain medicine. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, decompression was performed on 26 patients with thoracic disc herniation or stenosis with radicular or myelopathic symptoms in a full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach. No patients underwent additional posterior stabilization. Imaging and clinical data were collected in follow-up examinations for 18 months. RESULTS: Sufficient decompression was achieved in the full-endoscopic uniportal technique in all cases. The individual selection of the respective approach made it possible to reach the target area without manipulating the spinal cord. One patient experienced deterioration of a myelopathy. No other serious complications were observed. All patients, except one, experienced regression or improvement of symptoms. No evidence of increasing instability was found in imaging. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. The limited number of cases must be considered. CONCLUSIONS: The full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach was found to be a sufficient and minimally invasive method with the known advantages of an endoscopic procedure under continuous irrigation for monosegmental disc herniations. The inclusion criteria must be taken into consideration. If they are not met, an alternative full-endoscopic approach (interlaminar, transthoracic retropleural) or decompression in a conventional method must be selected. Additional stabilization does not appear to be necessary due to the low level of trauma. KEY WORDS: Extraforaminal approach, thoracic disc herniation, giant disc herniation, Full-endoscopic, minimally invasive, thoracic spine.
BACKGROUND: Surgery for thoracic disc herniation and stenosis is comparatively rare and often demanding. The goal is to achieve sufficient decompression without manipulating the spinal cord and to minimize surgical trauma and its consequences. Individual planning and various surgical techniques and approaches are required. The key factors for selecting the technique are anatomical location, consistency of the pathology, general condition of the patient, and the surgeon's experience. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was the evaluation of the technical implementation and outcomes of a full-endoscopic uniportal technique via the extraforaminal approach in patients with symptomatic soft or calcified disc herniation of the thoracic spine, taking specific advantages and disadvantages and literature into consideration. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A center for spine surgery and pain medicine. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, decompression was performed on 26 patients with thoracic disc herniation or stenosis with radicular or myelopathic symptoms in a full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach. No patients underwent additional posterior stabilization. Imaging and clinical data were collected in follow-up examinations for 18 months. RESULTS: Sufficient decompression was achieved in the full-endoscopic uniportal technique in all cases. The individual selection of the respective approach made it possible to reach the target area without manipulating the spinal cord. One patient experienced deterioration of a myelopathy. No other serious complications were observed. All patients, except one, experienced regression or improvement of symptoms. No evidence of increasing instability was found in imaging. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. The limited number of cases must be considered. CONCLUSIONS: The full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach was found to be a sufficient and minimally invasive method with the known advantages of an endoscopic procedure under continuous irrigation for monosegmental disc herniations. The inclusion criteria must be taken into consideration. If they are not met, an alternative full-endoscopic approach (interlaminar, transthoracic retropleural) or decompression in a conventional method must be selected. Additional stabilization does not appear to be necessary due to the low level of trauma. KEY WORDS: Extraforaminal approach, thoracic disc herniation, giant disc herniation, Full-endoscopic, minimally invasive, thoracic spine.
Authors: Christoph P Hofstetter; Yong Ahn; Gun Choi; J N A Gibson; S Ruetten; Yue Zhou; Zhen Zhou Li; Christoph J Siepe; Ralf Wagner; Jun-Ho Lee; Koichi Sairyo; Kyung Chul Choi; Chien-Min Chen; A E Telfeian; Xifeng Zhang; Arun Banhot; Pramod V Lokhande; N Prada; Jian Shen; F C Cortinas; N P Brooks; Peter Van Daele; Vit Kotheeranurak; Saqib Hasan; Gun Keorochana; Mohammed Assous; Roger Härtl; Jin-Sung Kim Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2020-05-28