Literature DB >> 30045345

Prospective Multicenter Study of a Multistep Screw Insertion Technique Using Patient-Specific Screw Guide Templates for the Cervical and Thoracic Spine.

Taku Sugawara1, Shuichi Kaneyama2, Naoki Higashiyama1, Shinya Tamura3, Takuro Endo1, Masato Takabatake2, Masatoshi Sumi2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective clinical study of a multistep screw insertion method using a patient-specific screw guide template system (SGTS) for the cervical and thoracic spine.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of SGTS for inserting screws into the cervical and thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior screw fixation is a standard procedure for spinal instrumentation; however, screw insertion carries the risk of injury to neuronal and vascular structures.
METHODS: Preoperative bone images of the computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed using 3D/multiplanar imaging software, and the screw trajectories were planned. Plastic templates with screw-guiding structures were created for each lamina using 3D design and printing technology. Three types of templates were made for precise multistep guidance, and all the templates were specially designed to fit and lock onto the lamina during the procedure. In addition, plastic vertebra models were generated, and preoperative screw insertion simulation was performed. This patient-specific SGTS was used to perform the surgery, and CT scanning was used to postoperatively evaluate screw placement.
RESULTS: Enrolled to verify this procedure were 103 patients with cervical, thoracic, or cervicothoracic pathologies. The SGTS were used to place 813 screws. Preoperatively, each template was found to fit exactly and to lock onto the lamina of the vertebra models. In addition, intraoperatively, the templates fit and locked onto the patient lamina, and the screws were inserted successfully. Postoperative CT scans confirmed that 801 screws (98.5%) were accurately placed without cortical violation. There were no injuries to the vessels or nerves.
CONCLUSION: The multistep, patient-specific SGTS is useful for intraoperative pedicle screw (PS) navigation in the cervical and thoracic spine. This method improves the accuracy of PS insertion and reduces the operating time and radiation exposure during spinal fixation surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30045345     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Sapan D Gandhi; Matthew W Colman
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  Three-dimensional printing versus freehand surgical techniques in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic spinal deformity.

Authors:  William M McLaughlin; Claire A Donnelley; Kristin Yu; Stephen M Gillinov; Dominick A Tuason
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

4.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Drill Guides for Occipitothoracic Fusion in a Pediatric Patient With Occipitocervical Instability.

Authors:  Peter A J Pijpker; Jos M A Kuijlen; Bart L Kaptein; Willem Pondaag
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 5.  Preoperative planning for intraoperative navigation guidance.

Authors:  Shahbaaz A Sabri; Philip J York
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Generating patient-matched 3D-printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides from Cone Beam CT images: Studies in ovine and porcine cadavers.

Authors:  Andrew Kanawati; Alex Constantinidis; Zoe Williams; Ricky O'Brien; Tess Reynolds
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  The Accuracy of 3D Printing Assistance in the Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Po-Chen Chen; Chien-Chun Chang; Hsien-Te Chen; Chia-Yu Lin; Tsung-Yu Ho; Yen-Jen Chen; Chun-Hao Tsai; Hsi-Kai Tsou; Chih-Sheng Lin; Yi-Wen Chen; Horng-Chaung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A Comparative Study of C2 Pedicle or Pars Screw Placement with Assistance from a 3-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Navigation Template versus C-Arm Based Navigation.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Jianan Zhang; Tuanjiang Liu; Shi Tang; Hao Chen; Keyuan Ding; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-26

10.  Pedicle screw placement in spinal neurosurgery using a 3D-printed drill guide template: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chengqiang Yu; Yufu Ou; Chengxin Xie; Yu Zhang; Jianxun Wei; Xiaoping Mu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.