Literature DB >> 30045033

Comparison of 2-Year Oncological Outcome and Early Recurrence Patterns in Patients with Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma Treated with Open or Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with an Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Günter Niegisch1, Alessandro Nini1,2, René Michalski1,3, Alina Henn1,4, David Mally1, Peter Albers1, Robert Rabenalt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on oncological follow-up after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) have been reported only scarcely and individual studies have reported an increase in early recurrences and atypical recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 89 patients with RARC were compared to 59 patients with open radical cystectomy (ORC) at a single institution. Two-year cancer-specific (2y-CSS) and 2-year overall survival (2y-OS) related to histopathological tumor stage of RARC patients calculated by Kaplan-Meier method were compared to ORC patients using log-rank test. Early clinical recurrence rate (eCR, progression ≤6 months post-cystectomy) and metastatic pattern of both groups were compared by chi-square test.
RESULTS: Median follow-up 32 months (RARC) and 47.5 months (ORC), both groups were balanced in baseline characteristics. For RARC pts, -2y-OS and CSS-free survival rates were 80 and 90%, for ORC pts 65 and 71% (all p > 0.05). Margin status was not significantly different. eCR was observed in 10 out of 89 (11%) RARC pts and in 7 out of 59 (12%) ORC pts (p = 0.9). No difference in atypical metastases was seen between groups.
CONCLUSION: Two-year oncological outcomes of RARC patients are comparable to ORC patients without differences regarding ePR or metastatic pattern.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncologic outcomes; Radical cystectomy; Robotic surgery; Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30045033     DOI: 10.1159/000491588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Kittinut Kijvikai; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

2.  Protocol of the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC): a non-randomized, 24-month, multicenter study comparing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery for radical cystectomy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Angelo Porreca; Katie Palmer; Walter Artibani; Alessandro Antonelli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Eugenio Brunocilla; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Maurizio Brausi; Gian Maria Busetto; Marco Carini; Giuseppe Carrieri; Antonio Celia; Luca Cindolo; Giovanni Cochetti; Renzo Colombo; Ettore De Berardinis; Ottavio De Cobelli; Fabrizio Di Maida; Amelio Ercolino; Franco Gaboardi; Antonio Galfano; Andrea Gallina; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Introini; Ettore Mearini; Andrea Minervini; Francesco Montorsi; Gennaro Musi; Giovannalberto Pini; Riccardo Schiavina; Silvia Secco; Sergio Serni; Claudio Simeone; Giovanni Tasso; Daniele D'Agostino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Will long term oncologic follow-up make the case for robotic assisted radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Michael D Gross; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12

4.  Does robotic radical cystectomy impede oncological outcome in bladder cancer patients?

Authors:  Günter Niegisch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.