Literature DB >> 30044713

Incidence of Breast Cancer in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.

Alina V Brenner1, Dale L Preston2, Ritsu Sakata1, Hiromi Sugiyama1, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez3, Benjamin French1, Mai Utada1, Elizabeth K Cahoon3, Atsuko Sadakane1, Kotaro Ozasa1, Eric J Grant1, Kiyohiko Mabuchi3.   

Abstract

The importance of reproductive history in breast tissue development and etiology of sporadic breast cancer in females is well established. However, there is limited evidence of factors, other than age, that modify risk of radiation-related breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated breast cancer incidence in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, adding 11 years of follow-up and incorporating reproductive history data. We used Poisson regression models to describe radiation risks and modifying effects of age and reproductive factors. Among 62,534 females, we identified 1,470 breast cancers between 1958 and 2009. Of 397 new cases diagnosed since 1998, 75% were exposed before age 20. We found a strong linear dose response with excess relative risk (ERR) of 1.12 per Gy [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73 to 1.59] for females at age 70 after exposure at age 30. The ERR decreased with increasing attained age ( P = 0.007) while excess absolute rate (EAR) increased with attained age up to age 70 ( P < 0.001). Age at menarche was a strong modifier of the radiation effect: for a given dose, both the ERR and EAR decreased with increasing age at menarche ( P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Also, independently, age-at-exposure effects on ERR and EAR differed before and after menarche ( P = 0.043 and P = 0.015, respectively, relative to log-linear trends), with highest risks for exposures around menarche. Despite the small number of male breast cancers (n = 10), the data continue to suggest a dose response (ERR per Gy = 5.7; 95% CI: 0.3 to 30.8; P = 0.018). Persistently increased risk of female breast cancer after radiation exposure and its modification pattern suggests heightened breast sensitivity during puberty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30044713     DOI: 10.1667/RR15015.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  25 in total

Review 1.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  High CT doses return to the agenda.

Authors:  W Rühm; R M Harrison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Effect of Heterogeneity in Background Incidence on Inference about the Solid-Cancer Radiation Dose Response in Atomic Bomb Survivors.

Authors:  John Cologne; Jaeyoung Kim; Hiromi Sugiyama; Benjamin French; Harry M Cullings; Dale L Preston; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Mammary Chain Irradiation in Left-Sided Breast Cancer: Can We Reduce the Risk of Secondary Cancer and Ischaemic Heart Disease with Modern Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques?

Authors:  Vanessa Figlia; Cristoforo Simonetto; Markus Eidemüller; Stefania Naccarato; Gianluisa Sicignano; Antonio De Simone; Ruggero Ruggieri; Rosario Mazzola; Christiane Matuschek; Edwin Bölke; Montserrat Pazos; Maximilian Niyazi; Claus Belka; Filippo Alongi; Stefanie Corradini
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 5.  Individual response of humans to ionising radiation: governing factors and importance for radiological protection.

Authors:  K E Applegate; W Rühm; A Wojcik; M Bourguignon; A Brenner; K Hamasaki; T Imai; M Imaizumi; T Imaoka; S Kakinuma; T Kamada; N Nishimura; N Okonogi; K Ozasa; C E Rübe; A Sadakane; R Sakata; Y Shimada; K Yoshida; S Bouffler
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Evidence for familial clustering in breast cancer age of onset.

Authors:  Ann Von Holle; Katie M O'Brien; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Female breast cancer risk in Bryansk Oblast, Russia, following prolonged low dose rate exposure to radiation from the Chernobyl power station accident.

Authors:  Nikolai Rivkind; Valeriy Stepanenko; Irina Belukha; Jamie Guenthoer; Kenneth J Kopecky; Sergei Kulikov; Irina Kurnosova; Lynn Onstad; Peggy Porter; Nikita Shklovskiy-Kordi; Vladislav Troshin; Paul Voillequé; Scott Davis
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Risk of Prostate Cancer Incidence among Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Dale L Preston; Alina V Brenner; Hiromi Sugiyama; Mai Utada; Ritsu Sakata; Atsuko Sadakane; Eric J Grant; Benjamin French; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016.

Authors:  Ljubica Zupunski; Alesia Yaumenenka; Anton Ryzhov; Ilya Veyalkin; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Sergii Masiuk; Olha Ivanova; Ausrele Kesminiene; Eero Pukkala; Pavel Moiseev; Anatoly Prysyazhnyuk; Joachim Schüz; Evgenia Ostroumova
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 7.316

Review 10.  Radiation concerns in frequent flyer patients: should imaging history influence decisions about recurrent imaging?

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.