Rosaria Del Giorno1, Angela Greco2, Anna Zasa2, Luca Clivio3, Michela Pironi4, Alessandro Ceschi5,6, Luca Gabutti1,7. 1. a Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology , Regional Hospital of Bellinzona and Valli, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Bellinzona , Switzerland. 2. b Quality and Patient Safety Service , La Carità Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Locarno , Switzerland. 3. c Department of Informatics , Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Bellinzona , Switzerland. 4. d Central Pharmacy Service , Institute of Pharmacological Sciences of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Bellinzona , Switzerland. 5. e Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology , Institute of Pharmacological Sciences of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale , Lugano , Switzerland. 6. f Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology , University Hospital Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland. 7. g Institute of Biomedicine , University of Southern Switzerland , Lugano , Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Reducing the inappropriate benzodiazepine (BZD) prescriptions represents a challenge for health care systems worldwide. The 'Choosing Wisely' campaign recommends against the use of BZD in the elderly as the first choice for insomnia, agitation, or delirium. We aimed to determine whether a transparent monitoring-benchmarking together with educational interventions, on top of the internal publication of a targeted recommendation, could be effective in curbing BZD prescriptions. METHODS: Multicenter before and after study in a network of five southern-Switzerland teaching hospitals. An intervention based on a transparent continuous monitoring-benchmarking system, called 'Reporting Wisely', able to collect, analyze, and report data on BZD prescriptions and educational interventions focused on themed meetings, audit, and feedback, was implemented. The intervention was limited to the Internal Medicine. The impact of the intervention on new BZD prescriptions and de-prescribing at hospital discharge, was assessed using segmented regression analyses of interrupted time-series and comparing Internal Medicine to Surgery. RESULTS: Between July 1st2014, and June 30th2017, data of 45,597 hospital admissions, from Internal Medicine and Surgery departments were analyzed. Before the intervention (July 1st2014 to December 31st2015), the mean monthly new BZD prescription rate was 7.2%; value dropping to 5.5% (24% relative reduction; p < 0.001) in the intervention phase (January 1st2016 to June 30th2017). At the end of the intervention a 15% relative increase of BZD de-prescribing was also found (p < 0.01). The use of atypical antipsychotic (AAP) and other potentially harmful sedative drugs did not increase. In the surgery department, exposed to the recommendation but not to the intervention, a constant upward trend with a slope of 0.129 new prescriptions per 100 admissions per month (95% CI 0.08-0.17; p < 0.001) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a dual intervention based on transparent monitoring-benchmarking and multidisciplinary education has proved useful in curbing new BZD prescriptions and in promoting BZD de-prescribing in the hospital setting.
OBJECTIVES: Reducing the inappropriate benzodiazepine (BZD) prescriptions represents a challenge for health care systems worldwide. The 'Choosing Wisely' campaign recommends against the use of BZD in the elderly as the first choice for insomnia, agitation, or delirium. We aimed to determine whether a transparent monitoring-benchmarking together with educational interventions, on top of the internal publication of a targeted recommendation, could be effective in curbing BZD prescriptions. METHODS: Multicenter before and after study in a network of five southern-Switzerland teaching hospitals. An intervention based on a transparent continuous monitoring-benchmarking system, called 'Reporting Wisely', able to collect, analyze, and report data on BZD prescriptions and educational interventions focused on themed meetings, audit, and feedback, was implemented. The intervention was limited to the Internal Medicine. The impact of the intervention on new BZD prescriptions and de-prescribing at hospital discharge, was assessed using segmented regression analyses of interrupted time-series and comparing Internal Medicine to Surgery. RESULTS: Between July 1st2014, and June 30th2017, data of 45,597 hospital admissions, from Internal Medicine and Surgery departments were analyzed. Before the intervention (July 1st2014 to December 31st2015), the mean monthly new BZD prescription rate was 7.2%; value dropping to 5.5% (24% relative reduction; p < 0.001) in the intervention phase (January 1st2016 to June 30th2017). At the end of the intervention a 15% relative increase of BZD de-prescribing was also found (p < 0.01). The use of atypical antipsychotic (AAP) and other potentially harmful sedative drugs did not increase. In the surgery department, exposed to the recommendation but not to the intervention, a constant upward trend with a slope of 0.129 new prescriptions per 100 admissions per month (95% CI 0.08-0.17; p < 0.001) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a dual intervention based on transparent monitoring-benchmarking and multidisciplinary education has proved useful in curbing new BZD prescriptions and in promoting BZD de-prescribing in the hospital setting.
Authors: Christine Soong; Cheryl Ethier; Yuna Lee; Dalia Othman; Lisa Burry; Peter E Wu; Karen A Ng; John Matelski; Barbara Liu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Stephanie Heinemann; Freya Neukirchen; Roland Nau; Eva Hummers; Wolfgang Himmel Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.890