Literature DB >> 30044679

Differential effects of radiant and mechanically applied thermal stimuli on human C-tactile afferent firing patterns.

Rochelle Ackerley1,2, Katarina Wiklund Fernström2, Helena Backlund Wasling2, Roger H Watkins2, Richard D Johnson2,3, Åke Vallbo2, Johan Wessberg2.   

Abstract

C-tactile (CT) afferents respond to gentle tactile stimulation, but only a handful of studies in humans and animals have investigated whether their firing is modified by temperature. We describe the effects of radiant thermal stimuli, and of stationary and very slowly moving mechanothermal stimuli, on CT afferent responses. We find that CT afferents are primarily mechanoreceptors, as they fired little during radiant thermal stimuli, but they exhibited different patterns of firing during combined mechano-cool stimulation compared with warming. CTs fired optimally to gentle, very slowly moving, or stationary mechanothermal stimuli delivered at neutral temperature (~32°C, normal skin temperature), but they responded with fewer spikes (median 67% decrease) and at significantly lower rates (47% decrease) during warm (~42°C) tactile stimuli. During cool tactile stimuli (~18°C), their mean instantaneous firing frequency significantly decreased by 35%, but they often fired a barrage of afterdischarge spikes at a low frequency (~5 Hz) that outlasted the mechanical stimulus. These effects were observed under a variety of stimulus conditions, including during stationary and slowly moving touch (0.1 cm/s), and we complemented these tactile approaches using a combined electrical-thermal stimulation experiment where we found a suppression of spiking during warming. Overall, CT afferents are exquisitely sensitive to tactile events, and we show that their firing is modulated with touch temperatures above and below neutral skin temperature. Warm touch consistently decreased their propensity to fire, whereas cool touch produced lower firing rates but afterdischarge spiking. NEW & NOTEWORTHY C-tactile (CT) afferents are thought to underpin pleasant touch, and previous work has shown that they respond optimally to a slow caress delivered at typical (neutral) skin temperature. Here, we show that, although CTs are primarily mechanoreceptive afferents, they are modified by temperature: warm touch decreases their firing, whereas cool touch produces lower firing rates but long-lasting spiking, frequently seen as afterdischarges. This has implications for the encoding of affective sensory events in human skin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT afferent; cool; mechanical; moving touch; skin; thermal; unmyelinated; warm

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30044679     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00940.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  4 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of affective touch and pain: A novel model suggests possible targets for pain amelioration.

Authors:  Larissa L Meijer; Carla Ruis; Maarten J van der Smagt; Erik J A Scherder; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.276

2.  An ultrafast system for signaling mechanical pain in human skin.

Authors:  Saad S Nagi; Andrew G Marshall; Adarsh Makdani; Ewa Jarocka; Jaquette Liljencrantz; Mikael Ridderström; Sumaiya Shaikh; Francis O'Neill; Dimah Saade; Sandra Donkervoort; A Reghan Foley; Jan Minde; Mats Trulsson; Jonathan Cole; Carsten G Bönnemann; Alexander T Chesler; M Catherine Bushnell; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  A topographical and physiological exploration of C-tactile afferents and their response to menthol and histamine.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Helena Backlund Wasling; Håkan Olausson; Francis McGlone; Johan Wessberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 4.  Feel-Good Requirements: Neurophysiological and Psychological Design Criteria of Affective Touch for (Assistive) Robots.

Authors:  Mehmet Ege Cansev; Daniel Nordheimer; Elsa Andrea Kirchner; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.