Literature DB >> 30044322

The Importance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Uterine Adenosarcomas: Analysis of Clinical, Prognostic, and Treatment Outcomes.

Michael J Nathenson1, Anthony P Conley2, Heather Lin3, Nicole Fleming4, Alexander Lazar5, Wei-Lien Wang5, Vinod Ravi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study examined the clinicopathologic features of adenosarcoma patients to determine potential prognostic factors and retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after primary treatment of adenosarcoma including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients with adenosarcoma were identified from the MD Anderson Cancer Center tumor registry between 1982 and 2014. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Pathologic characteristics were examined by sarcoma pathologists. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate OS, DFS, and LRFS. The log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups. Multivariate regression analyses of survival data were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Median OS and DFS for all patients were 8.5 and 4.7 years, respectively. Pathologic characteristics that influence OS and DFS were sarcomatous overgrowth (SO), myometrial invasion (MI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor size, number of mitosis, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, age, and resection status. Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with SO was 5.2 versus 14.5 years for patients without SO (P < 0.0001). Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with MI was 5.8 years versus not reached for patients without MI (P = 0.0005). Median OS for adenosarcoma patients with LVI was 1.0 versus 8.9 years for patients without LVI (P = 0.0021). On Cox analysis for OS and DFS and LRFS, only SO, MI, LVI, age, resection status, and FIGO stage remained significant. There was no difference in OS or LRFS for adjuvant radiation versus no adjuvant radiation (P = 0.17, P = 0.076).
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of LVI as a prognostic factor and confirms the prognostic significance of SO, MI, age, resection status, and FIGO stage for adenosarcoma. Furthermore, this study suggests that there is no additional benefit to adjuvant radiation. The standard-of-care treatment for adenosarcoma should remain total abdominal hysterectomy bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy +/- lymphadenectomy and no adjuvant radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30044322     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  2 in total

1.  Epidemiology of adenosarcoma and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted survival analysis of lymph node dissection in uterine adenosarcoma.

Authors:  Hanjie Hu; Zhewen Wei; Hong Zhao; Guangwen Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  The immune microenvironment of uterine adenosarcomas.

Authors:  Ali Mohammed Refaat Ali; Jen-Wei Tsai; Cheuk Hong Leung; Heather Lin; Vinod Ravi; Anthony P Conley; Alexander J Lazar; Wei-Lien Wang; Michael J Nathenson
Journal:  Clin Sarcoma Res       Date:  2020-03-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.