Penny Levickis1,2, Sheena Reilly2,3,4, Luigi Girolametto5, Obioha C Ukoumunne6, Melissa Wake2,4,7. 1. School of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 2. Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia. 3. Health Executive, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. 4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. 7. Department of Paediatrics and the Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a community sample of slow-to-talk toddlers, we aimed to (a) quantify how well maternal responsive behaviors at age 2 years predict language ability at age 4 and (b) examine whether maternal responsive behaviors more accurately predict low language status at age 4 than does expressive vocabulary measured at age 2 years. DESIGN OR METHODS: Prospective community-based longitudinal study. At child age 18 months, 1,138 parents completed a 100-word expressive vocabulary checklist within a population survey; 251 (22.1%) children scored ≤20th percentile and were eligible for the current study. Potential predictors at 2 years were (a) responsive language behaviors derived from videotaped parent-child free-play samples and (b) late-talker status. Outcomes were (a) Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool Second Edition receptive and expressive language standard score at 4 years and (b) low language status (standard score > 1.25 standard deviations below the mean on expressive or receptive language). RESULTS: Two hundred eight (82.9% of 251) participants were retained to age 4. In adjusted linear regression analyses, maternal expansions predicted higher receptive (p < 0.001, partial R2 = 6.5%) and expressive (p < 0.001, partial R2 = 7.7%), whereas labels predicted lower receptive (p = 0.01, partial R2 = 2.8%) and expressive (p = 0.007, partial R2 = 3.5%) language scores at 4. The logistic regression model containing only responsive behaviors achieved "fair" predictive ability of low language status at age 4 (area under curve [AUC] = 0.79), slightly better than the model containing only late-talker status (AUC = 0.74). This improved to "good" predictive ability with inclusion of other known risk factors (AUC = 0.82). CONCLUSION: A combination of short measures of different dimensions, such as parent responsive behaviors, in addition to a child's earlier language skills increases the ability to predict language outcomes at age 4 to a precision that is approaching clinical value. Research to further enhance predictive values should be a priority, enabling health professionals to identify which slow-to-talk toddlers most likely will or will not experience later poorer language.
BACKGROUND: In a community sample of slow-to-talk toddlers, we aimed to (a) quantify how well maternal responsive behaviors at age 2 years predict language ability at age 4 and (b) examine whether maternal responsive behaviors more accurately predict low language status at age 4 than does expressive vocabulary measured at age 2 years. DESIGN OR METHODS: Prospective community-based longitudinal study. At child age 18 months, 1,138 parents completed a 100-word expressive vocabulary checklist within a population survey; 251 (22.1%) children scored ≤20th percentile and were eligible for the current study. Potential predictors at 2 years were (a) responsive language behaviors derived from videotaped parent-child free-play samples and (b) late-talker status. Outcomes were (a) Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool Second Edition receptive and expressive language standard score at 4 years and (b) low language status (standard score > 1.25 standard deviations below the mean on expressive or receptive language). RESULTS: Two hundred eight (82.9% of 251) participants were retained to age 4. In adjusted linear regression analyses, maternal expansions predicted higher receptive (p < 0.001, partial R2 = 6.5%) and expressive (p < 0.001, partial R2 = 7.7%), whereas labels predicted lower receptive (p = 0.01, partial R2 = 2.8%) and expressive (p = 0.007, partial R2 = 3.5%) language scores at 4. The logistic regression model containing only responsive behaviors achieved "fair" predictive ability of low language status at age 4 (area under curve [AUC] = 0.79), slightly better than the model containing only late-talker status (AUC = 0.74). This improved to "good" predictive ability with inclusion of other known risk factors (AUC = 0.82). CONCLUSION: A combination of short measures of different dimensions, such as parent responsive behaviors, in addition to a child's earlier language skills increases the ability to predict language outcomes at age 4 to a precision that is approaching clinical value. Research to further enhance predictive values should be a priority, enabling health professionals to identify which slow-to-talk toddlers most likely will or will not experience later poorer language.
Authors: Laura Del Hoyo Soriano; Angela John Thurman; Danielle Harvey; Sara T Kover; Leonard Abbeduto Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Rosa Vilaseca; Magda Rivero; Rosa M Bersabé; María-José Cantero; Esperanza Navarro-Pardo; Clara Valls-Vidal; Fina Ferrer Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-04-24
Authors: Cristina McKean; Rose Watson; Jenna Charlton; Sue Roulstone; Caitlin Holme; Victoria Gilroy; James Law Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-02-08
Authors: Rebecca Grzadzinski; Sallie W Nowell; Elizabeth R Crais; Grace T Baranek; Lauren Turner-Brown; Linda R Watson Journal: Autism Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.633
Authors: Sarah Ellen Barnett; Penny Levickis; Cristina McKean; Carolyn Letts; Helen Stringer Journal: J Child Health Care Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 1.979