Literature DB >> 30043389

The Association of Encrustation and Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time in Urolithiasis and KUB Grading System.

Ibrahim Guven Kartal1, Burhan Baylan2, Alper Gok2, Azmi Levent Sagnak2, Nihat Karakoyunlu2, Mehmet Caglar Cakici2, Serafettin Kaymak2, Osman Raif Karabacak2, Hikmet Topaloglu2, Hamit Ersoy2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the management of prolonged indwelling ureteral stents and the newly developed KUB (kidney, ureter, and bladder) grading system for the classification of encrusted stents in urolithiasis.
METHOD: This study involved 69 patients that had indwelling and forgotten ureteral stents for more than 6 months after urolithiasis treatment. They were categorized into 4 groups based on indwelling time and were reviewed retrospectively. Patients whose ureteral stent could not be removed with simple cystoscopy were graded according to stone surface area and the KUB system.
RESULTS: The mean stent indwelling time was 23.1 months. Stone burden in KUB and, in proportion to that, total KUB (T) score showed increased association that was directly proportional to indwelling time (p < 0.001, p = 0.008). Surgical intervention was required in 73.9% of patients. Among patients requiring surgery, 78.4% were treated in a single session and multi-modal interventions were performed in 70.5%. K score ? 3 was found to be associated with multiple surgery requirements (odds ratio [OR];11.25, %95 confidence interval [CI]:2.132-59.375),multi-modal procedure requirements (OR;16.50, %95 CI:3.434-79.826 ), and lower stone-free rates (p = 0.04). Bscore ? 3 was associated with multi-modal procedure requirements (OR;8.90, %95 CI:1.052-75.462). U score ? 3and T score ? 9 were associated with an operating time >180 minutes (p < 0.001, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Prolonged indwelling time of the ureteral stent in urolithiasis is associated with increased encrustation and stone burden. Since the KUB system specifies stone burden and its particular localization, it can be used as a simple, convenient method for the planning treatment of encrusted ureteral stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30043389     DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  5 in total

Review 1.  Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: A review of literature.

Authors:  Sara Khoddami; Ben H Chew; Dirk Lange
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Single Session Endoscopic Removal of Bilateral Ureteric Stents Retained for Three Decades: A Case Report.

Authors:  Danny Darlington; Fatima Shirly Anitha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-22

Review 3.  Endourological management of encrusted ureteral stents: an up-to-date guide and treatment algorithm on behalf of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urology Urolithiasis Group.

Authors:  Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Amelia Pietropaolo; Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy; Øyvind Ulvik; Christian Beisland; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-12-06

4.  Interactive Effects of Copper-Doped Urological Implants with Tissue in the Urinary Tract for the Inhibition of Cell Adhesion and Encrustation in the Animal Model Rat.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kram; Henrike Rebl; Julia E de la Cruz; Antonia Haag; Jürgen Renner; Thomas Epting; Armin Springer; Federico Soria; Marion Wienecke; Oliver W Hakenberg
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Does potassium citrate administration change the type and composition of encrusted material on Double-J stent compared to primary stone?

Authors:  Abdolreza Mohammadi; Mohammad Mehdi Rakebi; Maryam Gholamnezhad; Mahin Ahmadi Pishkuhi; Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.370

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.