Literature DB >> 30043359

Resolving the Discrepancies Between Empirical and Rayleigh Charge Limiting Models for Globular Proteins.

Karen C B De Freitas1,2.   

Abstract

Starting with the Rayleigh charge limiting model, a slightly different approach is used to account for the well-known discrepancy that exists between the said model and experimental ESI MS data for globular proteins. It is shown using published datasets that for globular proteins, the mass density ρ exhibits a weak second-order dependence on its mass M, according to ρ(M)∝ M-α, α ~ 0.14. A direct equivalence established between ESI MS and x-ray techniques suggests a minimum but critical surface tension of 15.6 ± 5.2 mN/m for the droplet at the liquid-to-gas phase transition point. The packing density factor η for globular proteins is believed to lie between 1 (very tightly packed) and 4.6 (less tight, natively packed). While the Rayleigh charge limiting model has been linked historically to the CRM (J. Chem. Phys. 49:2240-2249, 1968; Anal. Chim. Acta 406:93-104, 2000), this paper does not expressly seek to justify the CRM, but rather uses empirical data and existing knowledge across subfields to help build a consistent picture of ESI MS phenomena that might be difficult to explain otherwise. These results would be useful in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, understanding liquid-to-gas phase transitions and in opening up new routes for cross-calibration between ESI MS, IM MS, NMR and x-ray crystallography studies. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charge Residue Mechanism (CRM); ESI MS; Globular proteins; Intrinsic density; Native proteins; Packing density; Protein density; Protein surface area; Quantitation; Rayleigh charge limit; Solvent accessible surface area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30043359     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-2025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  38 in total

1.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Albert J R Heck; Robert H H Van Den Heuvel
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 10.946

3.  Sizing large proteins and protein complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and ion mobility.

Authors:  Catherine S Kaddis; Shirley H Lomeli; Sheng Yin; Beniam Berhane; Marcin I Apostol; Valerie A Kickhoefer; Leonard H Rome; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Local densities orthogonal to beta-sheet amide planes: patterns of packing in globular proteins.

Authors:  D S Beardsley; W J Kauzmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Extremely supercharged proteins in mass spectrometry: profiling the pH of electrospray generated droplets, narrowing charge state distributions, and increasing ion fragmentation.

Authors:  Muhammad A Zenaidee; William A Donald
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.616

6.  The role of the detergent micelle in preserving the structure of membrane proteins in the gas phase.

Authors:  Eamonn Reading; Idlir Liko; Timothy M Allison; Justin L P Benesch; Arthur Laganowsky; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Boundaries of mass resolution in native mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip Lössl; Joost Snijder; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Random close packing in protein cores.

Authors:  Jennifer C Gaines; W Wendell Smith; Lynne Regan; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.529

9.  The pH Dependence of Product Ion Spectra Obtained from Precursor Ions with the Same Charge Number in ESI of Carbonic Anhydrase 2.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Nabuchi; Kenji Hirose; Mitsuo Takayama
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Collision cross sections for structural proteomics.

Authors:  Erik G Marklund; Matteo T Degiacomi; Carol V Robinson; Andrew J Baldwin; Justin L P Benesch
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.