Cecilia Chao1, Blanka Golebiowski1, Fiona Stapleton1, Xiangtian Zhou2, Shihao Chen3,4, Michele C Madigan1,5. 1. School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW, Sydney, Australia. 2. School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. 3. School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. chenle@rocketmail.com. 4. Affiliated eye hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China. chenle@rocketmail.com. 5. Ophthalmology and Save Sight Institute, Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative proportion of conjunctival MUC5AC+ and MUC5AC- goblet cells in a post-LASIK population and their association with dry eye indicators and corneal nerve morphology using a MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index. METHODS: Twenty subjects who had undergone LASIK > 12 months previously and 20 age-matched controls were recruited. Dry eye symptoms, tear breakup time, osmolarity, meniscus area and corneal nerve morphology were examined. Conjunctival impression cytology samples were collected from inferior-temporal bulbar conjunctiva using Millicell® inserts. Total goblet cell density was determined from positive cytokeratin-7 (CK7) immunolabelling; MUC5AC+ goblet cell density was determined from both CK7+- and MUC5AC+-immunolabelled cells. The ratio of MUC5AC+ to total density was defined as the "MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index". Differences in variables between groups and the associations between goblet cell variables and clinical assessments were examined. RESULTS: No significant differences in the total and MUC5AC+ goblet cell density and tear film parameters were found between groups, although greater ocular discomfort was reported in the post-LASIK group (P = 0.02). A higher MUC5AC+ Index was associated with worse/greater dry eye symptoms (ρ = 0.55, P = 0.01) and higher nerve tortuosity (ρ = 0.57, P = 0.01) in the post-LASIK group; lower nerve density and thickness was found in controls (ρ > -0.45, P < 0.05), but not associated with tear film parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index provides an indicator of mucin secretion for assessing the goblet cell function in dry eye. In the post-LASIK participants, we found an increased MUC5AC+ Index associated with worse dry eye symptoms and adverse changes in corneal nerve morphology.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative proportion of conjunctival MUC5AC+ and MUC5AC- goblet cells in a post-LASIK population and their association with dry eye indicators and corneal nerve morphology using a MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index. METHODS: Twenty subjects who had undergone LASIK > 12 months previously and 20 age-matched controls were recruited. Dry eye symptoms, tear breakup time, osmolarity, meniscus area and corneal nerve morphology were examined. Conjunctival impression cytology samples were collected from inferior-temporal bulbar conjunctiva using Millicell® inserts. Total goblet cell density was determined from positive cytokeratin-7 (CK7) immunolabelling; MUC5AC+ goblet cell density was determined from both CK7+- and MUC5AC+-immunolabelled cells. The ratio of MUC5AC+ to total density was defined as the "MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index". Differences in variables between groups and the associations between goblet cell variables and clinical assessments were examined. RESULTS: No significant differences in the total and MUC5AC+ goblet cell density and tear film parameters were found between groups, although greater ocular discomfort was reported in the post-LASIK group (P = 0.02). A higher MUC5AC+ Index was associated with worse/greater dry eye symptoms (ρ = 0.55, P = 0.01) and higher nerve tortuosity (ρ = 0.57, P = 0.01) in the post-LASIK group; lower nerve density and thickness was found in controls (ρ > -0.45, P < 0.05), but not associated with tear film parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The MUC5AC+ Goblet Cell Index provides an indicator of mucin secretion for assessing the goblet cell function in dry eye. In the post-LASIK participants, we found an increased MUC5AC+ Index associated with worse dry eye symptoms and adverse changes in corneal nerve morphology.
Authors: Anthony J Bron; Cintia S de Paiva; Sunil K Chauhan; Stefano Bonini; Eric E Gabison; Sandeep Jain; Erich Knop; Maria Markoulli; Yoko Ogawa; Victor Perez; Yuichi Uchino; Norihiko Yokoi; Driss Zoukhri; David A Sullivan Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Isabelle Jalbert; Michele C Madigan; Mei Shao; Jennifer Ng; Jenny Cheng; Daniel Wong; Charles McMonnies Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.761