Literature DB >> 30043077

A CFD approach to understand nasoseptal perforations.

M A Burgos1, E Sanmiguel-Rojas2, R Rodríguez3, F Esteban-Ortega4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nasoseptal perforations (NSP) are becoming common in the modern world, and can cause a wide variety of symptoms, including a sensation of nasal obstruction, epistaxis, crusting, dryness, headache, nasal pain and a whistling sound. There is an extensive range of surgical treatment techniques, but reported results were rarely statistically significant. The lack of consistent surgical results may be related to the lack of knowledge about the pathophysiology of NSP and how they affect the nasal flow. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has proved to be a very useful tool to study nasal function.
METHODS: We have used CFD software (the program MECOMLAND® and the Digbody® tool for virtual surgery) to investigate the behaviour of the parameters R-[Formula: see text] based on CFD results, when four subjects underwent virtual surgery to induce a septal perforation: two subjects with healthy noses and two patients suffering from nasal airway obstruction. For each case a CFD study was performed, before and after creating an anterior (close to nostrils) or a posterior (close to choanae) NSP.
RESULTS: In all cases analyzed, a posterior septal perforation did not result in a significant volumetric flow rate [Formula: see text] through the perforation between nasal passages. However, for anterior defects only in those nasal cavities considered diseased or unhealthy, high values of [Formula: see text] were found.
CONCLUSION: The induced NSP only rendered significant flow alterations in noses with preexisting nasal airway obstruction alterations, whereas in nasal cavities considered as normal the creation of a NSP did not produce significant differences between both sides. We strongly suggest that this finding can explain the variety of symptoms and the number of asymptomatic patients bearing NSP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Nasal septal perforations; Virtual nasal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30043077     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5073-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  32 in total

1.  Flow simulation in the human upper respiratory tract.

Authors:  Ted B Martonen; Liang Quan; Zongqin Zhang; C J Musante
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 2.  Different surgical treatments for nasal septal perforation and their outcomes.

Authors:  A Y Goh; S S M Hussain
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 3.  Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.

Authors:  R F André; H D Vuyk; A Ahmed; K Graamans; G J Nolst Trenité
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Imaging prevalence of nasal septal perforation in an urban population.

Authors:  Menachem Gold; Issac Boyack; Nicholas Caputo; Aaron Pearlman
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Clinical or rhinometric assessment of the nasal airway--which is better?

Authors:  P F Hardcastle; A White; R J Prescott
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1988-10

6.  DigBody®: A new 3D modeling tool for nasal virtual surgery.

Authors:  M A Burgos; E Sanmiguel-Rojas; Narinder Singh; F Esteban-Ortega
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results.

Authors:  Paulo Borges Dinis; Haula Haider
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Total septal perforation repair with a pericranial flap: Radio-anatomical and clinical findings.

Authors:  Isam Alobid; Cristóbal Langdon; Mauricio López-Chacon; Joaquim Enseñat; Ricardo Carrau; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Alfonso Santamaría
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 9.  Patient specific CFD models of nasal airflow: overview of methods and challenges.

Authors:  Sung Kyun Kim; Yang Na; Jee-In Kim; Seung-Kyu Chung
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Clinical symptomatology and paranasal sinus involvement with nasal septal perforation.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymptomatic vs symptomatic septal perforations: a computational fluid dynamics examination.

Authors:  Chengyu Li; Guillermo Maza; Alexander A Farag; Jillian P Krebs; Bhakthi Deshpande; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Percutaneous Thrombin Injection Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics of Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysms.

Authors:  Hyoung-Ho Kim; Kyung-Wuk Kim; Changje Lee; Young Ho Choi; Min Uk Kim; Yasutaka Baba
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.