| Literature DB >> 30042823 |
Georgi Atanasov1,2, Corinna Dietel3, Linda Feldbrügge1,2, Christian Benzing1, Felix Krenzien1,2, Andreas Brandl1, Shadi Katou1, Katrin Schierle4, Simon C Robson5, Katrin Splith1, Georg Wiltberger6, Anja Reutzel-Selke1, Sven Jonas7, Andreas Pascher1, Marcus Bahra1, Johann Pratschke1, Moritz Schmelzle1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumour angiogenesis is modulated on both an epigenetic and protein level and has potential implications for immune cell responses. However, the importance of related angiogenic biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is unknown. This study assessed human CCA samples for the expression of angiogenesis-associated microRNAs, angiopoietins (Angs) and monocytes expressing the Ang-receptor, TIE2, with regards to prognostic significance after liver resection.Entities:
Keywords: TIE2-expressing monocytes; angiopoietins; cholangiocarcinoma; miR-126; microRNAs
Year: 2018 PMID: 30042823 PMCID: PMC6057457 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Angiogenic micro-RNAs in hilar (HC; n = 45) and intrahepatic (iCC; n = 43) cholangiocarcinoma
The relative expression was calculated using the comparative ΔΔCT method, and the values were expressed as 2−ΔCT compared to normal liver tissue. MiR-107 and miR-126 showed a strong downregulation in HC and iCC, compared to adjacent noncancerous liver tissue. MiR-145 in HC revealed a strong upregulation, when compared with normal tissue or iCC (all p<0.05).
Correlation of microRNA-126 relative expression in tumor with clinicopathological characteristics of patient with cholangiocarcinoma
| Clinicopathological analysis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | miR-126 low | miR-126 high | P |
| No. of patients | 18 | 27 | |
| Gender | 0.895 | ||
| Female | 8 (44.4%) | 13 (46.4%) | |
| Male | 10 (55.6%) | 14 (53.6%) | |
| Patient age, years | 0.170 | ||
| ≤ 60 | 10 (55.6%) | 20 (75.0%) | |
| > 60 | 8 (44.4%) | 7 (25.0%) | |
| Tumor size | 0.0001 | ||
| ≤ 50 mm | 8 (44.4%) | 27 (100%) | |
| > 50 mm | 10 (55.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Pathologic N stage | 0.542 | ||
| Positive | 7 (38.8%) | 14 (51.9%) | |
| Negative | 11 (61.2%) | 13 (48.1%) | |
| Histologic differentiation | 0.798 | ||
| Well | 4 (22.2%) | 4 (14.8%) | |
| Moderate/poor | 13 (77.8%) | 23 (85.2%) | |
| No. of patients | 29 | 14 | |
| Gender | 0.676 | ||
| Female | 15 (55.6%) | 8 (57.1%) | |
| Male | 14 (44.4%) | 6 (42.9%) | |
| Patient age, years | 0.524 | ||
| ≤ 60 | 12 (41.4%) | 4 (28.6%) | |
| > 60 | 17 (58.6%) | 10 (71.4%) | |
| Tumor size | 0.967 | ||
| ≤ 50 mm | 9 (31.0%) | 4 (28.6%) | |
| > 50 mm | 20 (69.0%) | 10 (71.4%) | |
| Pathologic N stage | 0.013 | ||
| Positive | 14 (47.4%) | 1 (7.1%) | |
| Negative | 15 (52.6%) | 13 (92.9%) | |
| Histologic differentiation | 0.529 | ||
| Well | 20 (69.0%) | 9 (64.3%) | |
| Moderate/poor | 9 (31.0%) | 5 (35.7%) | |
Figure 2Cholangiocarcinoma stained with antibodies for CD14 and TIE2 showing a high abundance of TIE2-expressing monocytes (TEMs) (arrow) in close proximity to blood vessels (asterisk)
Original magnification: x100. Detail of selected area, original magnification: x400. Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 3(A) Survival after intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma surgery in relation to miR-128 expression in tumorous tissue. (B) Survival after hilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery in relation to miR-126 expression in tumorous tissue. (C) Survival after intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma surgery in relation to the presence or absence of TEMs in the tumour-infiltrating front. (D) Recurrence-free survival after intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma surgery in relation to the presence or absence of TEMs in the tumour-infiltrating front.
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with cholangiocarcinoma
| Multivariate analysis (Overall Survival) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Category | Odds ratio | p | Confidence interval |
| Histologic Differentiation | well or moderate/poor | 2.266 | 0.040 | 1.038-4.946 |
| T Status | T2/T3 | 1.688 | 0.236 | 0.710-4.009 |
| Overall Tumor Recurrence | negative/positive | 0.011 | 0.0001 | 0.001-0.093 |
| Local Tumor Recurrence | negative/positive | 0.707 | 0.401 | 0.315-1.588 |
| Multiple Tumor Nodules | negative/positive | 0.135 | 0.010 | 0.029-0.623 |
| Tumor size | negative/positive | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.000-0.137 |
| TEMs in tumor | negative/positive | 2.423 | 0.040 | 1.042-5.633 |
| miR-128 expression | low/high | 38.976 | 0.004 | 3.257-466.374 |
| miR-126 expression | low/high | 0.322 | 0.013 | 0.131-0.789 |
| Tumor Nodules | solitary/multiple | 0.301 | 0.001 | 0.149-0.606 |
| Perineural Sheet Infiltration | negative/positive | 0.370 | 0.008 | 0.178-0.772 |
| Histologic Differentiation | well or moderate/poor | 2.123 | 0.047 | 1.010-4.460 |
| Lymph Node Involvement | negative/positive | 0.542 | 0.066 | 0.282-1.042 |
| TEMs in tumor invasive front | high/low | 2.721 | 0.047 | 1.014-7.302 |
Following clinicopathological parameters were reported previously in the same cohort of patients: histologic differentiation, T status, overall and local tumor recurrence, multiple tumor nodules, tumor size, perineural sheet infiltration and lymph node involvement [37].
Figure 4MiR-126 signalling is hypothesised to upregulate the Ang-1-dependent direct beneficial effects on tumour growth and indirect effects by fostering the homing TEMs in tumours, which in turn has a negative impact on CCA progression