| Literature DB >> 30042293 |
Gabriela Maciel-Vergara1,2,3, Annette Bruun Jensen4, Jørgen Eilenberg5.
Abstract
Opportunistic bacteria are often ubiquitous and do not trigger disease in insects unless the conditions are specifically favorable for bacterial development in a suitable host. In this paper, we isolated and identified a bacterium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, from the larvae of the giant mealworm Zophobas morio and we studied the possible entry routes by challenging larvae with per os injection and subdermal injection. We also evaluated the effect of exposing groups of larvae to P. aeruginosa inoculated in their feed and the effect of exposing wounded larvae to P. aeruginosa. We concluded that the mortality rate of Z. morio larvae is higher when P. aeruginosa gets in direct contact with the hemolymph via intracoelomic injection compared to a situation where the bacterium is force-fed. Larvae with an open wound exposed to P. aeruginosa presented higher mortality rate compared to larvae with a wound that was not exposed to the bacterium. We documented too, that cannibalism and scavenging was more prevalent among larvae in a group, when P. aeruginosa is present compared to when it is absent. We discuss hereby different aspects related with the pathogen's entry routes to insects the complexity of pathogen's transmission in high population densities and different ways to prevent and/or control P. aeruginosa in mass rearing systems.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial infection; cannibalism; disease transmission; entry route; insect rearing; opportunistic microorganism
Year: 2018 PMID: 30042293 PMCID: PMC6163536 DOI: 10.3390/insects9030088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Summary of experiments conducted in this work.
| Possible Entry Route/Transmission Route | ||
|---|---|---|
| Experiment |
| Cuticular |
| Force-feeding | x | |
| Group exposure (feed) | x | x |
| Subdermal injection | x | |
| Purposeful wounding | x | x |
Figure 1(a) Set-up of group exposure of larvae to P. aeruginosa (in the feed); (b) control larvae (green label) and larvae exposed to bacterial cells (orange label) 10 dpi.
Figure 2(a) Diseased Z. morio larvae displaying melanized stains before death (white arrows); (b) Z. morio larvae in a process of melanization, 48 h after death.
Figure 3(a) In vitro solid (nutrient agar) and (b) liquid culture (nutrient broth) of P. aeruginosa isolate from Z. morio larvae.
Biochemical characterization of the P. aeruginosa isolate from Z. morio by the API20E test.
| Microorganism/Reaction | ONPG | ADH | LDC | CIT | H2S | URE | TDA | IND | VP | GEL | GLU | MAN | INO | SOR | RHA | SAC | MEL | AMY | ARA | OX | NO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolate from | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
|
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||
|
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
ONPG = beta-galactosidase; ADH = L-arginine dihydrolase; LDC = lusine decarboxylase; CIT = trisodium citrate utilization; H2S = H2S production; URE = urea hydrolysis; TDA = deaminase; IND = indole production; VP = acetoin production; GEL = gelatinase; GLU = glucose fermentation/oxidation; MAN = mannitol fermentation/oxidation; INO = inositol fermentation/oxidation; SOR = sorbitol fermentation/oxidation; RHA = rhamnose fermentation/oxidation; SAC = sucrose fermentation/oxidation; MEL = melibiose fermentation/oxidation; AMY = amygdalin fermentation/oxidation; ARA = arabinose fermentation/oxidation; OX = oxidase.
Figure 4(a) Mortality rate of larvae force-fed with cells of P. aeruginosa at doses D1 of ≈1.1 × 107 UFC/larva (D1), D2 of ≈5.4 × 106 UFC/larva (D2) or 10 mM MgSO4 solution as a control (C); (b) cannibalism rate among larvae in groups exposed to ≈2.2 × 108 UFC of P. aeruginosa. Bars having no letters in common differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Figure 5(a) Larvae molting in group exposure experiment; (b) injury due to cannibalism in larva’s proleg (white arrow) and cannibalized dead larva (yellow arrow).
Figure 6(a) Mortality rate of larvae injected subdermal with either dose 2 (D2) of ≈5.4 × 106 UFC/larva), dose 3 (D3) of ≈5.4 × 105 UFC/larva) of P. aeruginosa cells, or 10 mM MgSO2 solution as a control (C); (b) mortality of Z. morio larvae subjected to P. aeruginosa exposure by wounding. Bars having no letters in common and differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.
Mortality rate of different insect species challenged with P. aeruginosa by different methods.
| Order | Insect Species | Instar | Force-Feeding | Diet Incorporation | Sub Dermal Injection | Other Method | Reference | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry Route | Per os | Per os | Cuticular | Cuticular | |||||||||||
| Dose (UFC/ind.) | Mort (%) | DDpi * | Dose (UFC/ind.) | Mort (%) | DDpi * | Dose (UFC/ind.) | Mort (%) | DDpi * | Dose (UFC/ind.) | Mort (%) | DDpi * | ||||
|
| L5 | 1 | 50 | 2+ | [ | ||||||||||
| L5 | 3.57 × 102 | 60 | 2 | [ | |||||||||||
| L5 | 3.57 × 104 | 100 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
| - | 8 × 103–2.9 × 103 | 50 | 7–21 | 10–20 | 50 | 2–3 | [ | |||||||
| - | 1.8 × 104–2.4 × 104 | 50 | 2 | 6 × 104 | 100 | 1 | 5.3 × 104 (°) | 100 | 1 | [ | |||||
| 5.3 × 104 | 100 | 2 | |||||||||||||
|
| Adult | - | 50 | 1+ | [ | ||||||||||
| Adult | - | 100 | 1+ | [ | |||||||||||
|
| L1 | 1 × 105 | 50 | 9 × 102 | 50 | 6 ± 3 | 1 × 105 | 50 | 8 ± 3 | [ | |||||
| L2 | 1 × 105 | 50 | 1 × 103 | 50 | 6 ± 3 | 1 × 105 | 50 | 8 ± 3 | |||||||
| PP | 4 × 105 | 50 | 2 × 103 | 50 | 6 ± 3 | 2 × 105 | 50 | 8 ± 3 | |||||||
| L | 1.1 × 107 | 56 | 1–2 | 5.4 × 106 | 98 | 1–2 | 2.2 × 107 (^) | 32 | 11–12 | This work | |||||
| L | 5.4 × 106 | 30 | 1–2 | 5.4 × 105 | 41 | 4–5 | 3.6 × 107 (^^) | 56.6 | 15 | ||||||
* Ddpi indicates death at days post-infection (1) P. aeruginosa PA14. Mortality values correspond to the calculated median lethal dose (LD50). (2) P. aeruginosa PA01. (3) Calculated LD50 = 2.26 ± 0.03 × 102. (4) There is no indication of which was the specific species used for each infection method. (5) Mortality value due to diet incorporation corresponds to the calculated LD50. Other infection method: spraying. (°) The difference in time (to reach 100% mortality) between the two spraying experiments was probably due to the incubation conditions: DDpi 1 = 38 + 2 C and 35 + 5% RH and DDpi 2 = 25 + 2 C and 85 + 5% RH. (6) No exact dose was injected. Flies were pricked in the thorax with a needle the tip of which was dipped in suspension of P. aeruginosa (ATCC25102) calibrated at 0.45 OD600/mL, without indication of the UFC concentration. (7) 4–7-d old male flies. Infection by pricking flies on the dorsal thorax with a needle dipped into a cell suspension containing 107 CFU. (8) Mortality values correspond to calculated LD50. Larval weight: L1, small larvae = 1.9 + 0.7 g; L2, large larvae = 4.3 + 1.4 g; PP, pre-pupae = 5.7 + 1.4 g. Other infection method: wading. (9) Larval weight: 0.8 + 0.1 g. Other infection method: wounding (^) and group exposure (^^). For the group exposure experiment, mortality rate is the result of cannibalism.