Literature DB >> 30041952

Interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of individual MRI criteria for diagnosis of placental adhesion disorders.

S K Goergen1, E Posma2, D Wrede3, J Collett4, J Pyman4, E Alibrahim5, J Keene5, A Dobrotwir5.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of several criteria for the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorder (PAD) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess interobserver agreement and reader accuracy based on years of interpretive experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blinded evaluation of the placental MRI studies of 28 randomly selected women, 18 with PADs and 10 without PADs, was undertaken by three radiologists with 10, 5, and 2 years' experience in placental MRI interpretation. The presence of placenta praevia, dark intraplacental bands, heterogeneity, uterine bulging, "shaggy dog" appearance of the uterine serosa, subjective impression of extraplacental invasion, and dark intraplacental bands on diffusion-weighted imaging were assessed. Placental histology was reviewed blinded to the original reports and to MRI interpretation and this, along with clinical information at the time of delivery, formed the reference standard.
RESULTS: Dark intraplacental bands on T2-weighted imaging were the most sensitive and specific as well as the most agreed upon (kappa=0.7) criterion for PAD for the three readers. Assessment of uterine bulging (kappa=0.42) and placental heterogeneity (kappa=0.48) did not improve diagnostic accuracy. DWI improved sensitivity but decreased specificity for the least experienced reader and did not change sensitivity or specificity for the more experienced readers.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of the placenta for dark bands is the most sensitive, specific, and reproducible criterion for diagnosis of PADs using MRI.
Copyright © 2018 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30041952     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Pre-clinical magnetic resonance imaging of retroplacental clear space throughout gestation.

Authors:  Andrew A Badachhape; Aarav Kumar; Ketan B Ghaghada; Igor V Stupin; Mayank Srivastava; Laxman Devkota; Zbigniew Starosolski; Eric A Tanifum; Verghese George; Karin A Fox; Chandrasekhar Yallampalli; Ananth V Annapragada
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Priyanka Jha; Liina Pōder; Charis Bourgioti; Nishat Bharwani; Sara Lewis; Amita Kamath; Stephanie Nougaret; Philippe Soyer; Michael Weston; Rosa P Castillo; Aki Kido; Rosemarie Forstner; Gabriele Masselli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Step-by-Step Approach.

Authors:  Sitthipong Srisajjakul; Patcharin Prapaisilp; Sirikan Bangchokdee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Effectiveness of a fetal magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for predicting the prognosis of pernicious placenta previa: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Lue Zou; Pengyuan Wang; Zixuan Song; Xiaoxue Wang; Xueting Chen; Mingjie Zhang; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Normative placental structure in pregnancy using quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nickie Andescavage; Kushal Kapse; Yuan-Chiao Lu; Scott D Barnett; Marni Jacobs; Alexis C Gimovsky; Homa Ahmadzia; Jessica Quistorff; Catherine Lopez; Nicole Reinholdt Andersen; Dorothy Bulas; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.287

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.