Maximilian Kreibich1, Tobias Soekeland2, Friedhelm Beyersdorf2, Joseph E Bavaria3, Holger Schröfel2, Martin Czerny2, Bartosz Rylski2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: maximilian.kreibich@universitaets-herzzentrum.de. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to screen patients with acute type A aortic dissection for anatomic feasibility of ascending aortic endovascular treatment with a valve-carrying conduit. METHODS: High-quality computed tomography scans of 167 patients were available for screening. Aortic dimensions were measured using multiplanar reconstruction in the plane perpendicular to the manually corrected aortic center line. The simulated stent-graft 10-mm-long landing zones were measured starting at the sinotubular junction (proximal landing zone) and ending at the brachiocephalic trunk (distal landing zone). Exclusion criterion was an entry within the aortic root or the landing zone. RESULTS: In 113 patients (68%), the entry was in a coverable zone in the ascending aorta with sufficient proximal and distal landing zone or in more distal aortic segments. In these patients, the median distance between the proximal and distal landing zone was 89.1 (first quartile: 80.0 mm; third quartile: 101.2 mm) and the median diameter difference was 5.0 mm (2.0; 10.1) (12.3 [4.9; 23.0] %). The diameter difference was less than 2 mm in 32 patients (28%), between 6 mm and 10 mm in 20 patients (18%), between 10 mm and 14 mm in 11 patients (10%), and 14 mm or greater in 10 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of all patients who present with type A dissections are potential candidates for treatment with endovascular valve-carrying conduits, but most patients would require tapered stent-grafts.
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to screen patients with acute type A aortic dissection for anatomic feasibility of ascending aortic endovascular treatment with a valve-carrying conduit. METHODS: High-quality computed tomography scans of 167 patients were available for screening. Aortic dimensions were measured using multiplanar reconstruction in the plane perpendicular to the manually corrected aortic center line. The simulated stent-graft 10-mm-long landing zones were measured starting at the sinotubular junction (proximal landing zone) and ending at the brachiocephalic trunk (distal landing zone). Exclusion criterion was an entry within the aortic root or the landing zone. RESULTS: In 113 patients (68%), the entry was in a coverable zone in the ascending aorta with sufficient proximal and distal landing zone or in more distal aortic segments. In these patients, the median distance between the proximal and distal landing zone was 89.1 (first quartile: 80.0 mm; third quartile: 101.2 mm) and the median diameter difference was 5.0 mm (2.0; 10.1) (12.3 [4.9; 23.0] %). The diameter difference was less than 2 mm in 32 patients (28%), between 6 mm and 10 mm in 20 patients (18%), between 10 mm and 14 mm in 11 patients (10%), and 14 mm or greater in 10 patients (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Two thirds of all patients who present with type A dissections are potential candidates for treatment with endovascular valve-carrying conduits, but most patients would require tapered stent-grafts.