Literature DB >> 30041908

Treatment strategy modification and its implication on the medical cost of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.

Nobuhiro Tanaka1, Shun Kohsaka2, Tatsunori Murata3, Takashi Akasaka4, Kazushige Kadota5, Shirou Uemura6, Tetsuya Amano7, Nobuo Shiode8, Yoshihiro Morino9, Kenshi Fujii10, Yutaka Hikichi11, Masato Nakamura12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could improve outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI. However, the economic impact of FFR-guided PCI remains largely unknown in the medical system in Japan. We evaluated the impact of treatment strategy modification by FFR measurement on the direct medical cost using a model analysis with a decision tree model in Japan.
METHODS: For the clinical parameters set in the model, the findings from CVIT-DEFER registry were adopted. Cost parameters were considered on the assumption that coronary angiography, FFR measurement, and the treatment are performed at Diagnosis Procedure combination (DPC) hospitals, and the costs were calculated based on the medical fee reimbursement systems in Japan.
RESULTS: The probability of deferral of PCI in patients who were allocated to PCI based on coronary angiography was set as 90.1% based on the CVIT-DEFER registry. In the model analysis, the cost of tests was increased by 185,660 JPY per patient by the addition of FFR measurement, but the cost of treatment with PCI was reduced by 561,425 JPY per patient, and the entire cost of treatment was reduced by 322,675 JPY, resulting in the expected reduction in the total expected medical cost by 137,015 JPY per patient.
CONCLUSION: Under contemporary Japanese practice, FFR-guided PCI has potential to reduce the medical cost by effective reassessment of coronary stenosis and reducing inappropriate application of PCI.
Copyright © 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery stenosis; Fractional flow reserve; Medical cost; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2018        PMID: 30041908     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  On-site evaluation of CT-based fractional flow reserve using simple boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Yusuke Yoshikawa; Masahiko Nakamoto; Masanori Nakamura; Takeharu Hoshi; Erika Yamamoto; Shunsuke Imai; Yoshiaki Kawase; Munenori Okubo; Hiroki Shiomi; Takeshi Kondo; Hitoshi Matsuo; Takeshi Kimura; Naritatsu Saito
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  The Current Status of Intervention for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis in the Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry.

Authors:  Jin Ho Kim; Woonggil Choi; Ki Chang Kim; Chang Wook Nam; Bum Kee Hong; June Hong Kim; Doo Soo Jeon; Jang Whan Bae; Sang Hyun Kim; Keon Woong Moon; Byung Ryul Cho; Doo Il Kim; Jae Sik Jang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 3.  Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease in Japan: A long-term longitudinal study using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Naoya Matsumoto; Eri Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakata
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Effects of hemodialysis and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate in nonhemodialysis on clinical outcomes after fractional flow reserve-guided deferral of revascularization.

Authors:  Masashi Yokoi; Tsuyoshi Ito; Takafumi Nakayama; Hiroshi Fujita; Tomonori Sugiura; Yoshihiro Seo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.