Literature DB >> 30041889

Outcomes and Effects of Hepatic Cirrhosis in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Ahmed S Yassin1, Ahmed Subahi2, Hossam Abubakar2, Emmanuel Akintoye2, Rashid Alhusain3, Oluwole Adegbala4, Abdelrahman Ahmed2, Adel Elmoughrabi2, Eihab Subahi3, Mohit Pahuja5, Ali Sahlieh6, Mahir Elder5, Amir Kaki5, Theodore Schreiber5, Tamam Mohamad5.   

Abstract

Comparative outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with and without liver cirrhosis are scarce. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and impact of liver cirrhosis on patients who underwent TAVI. Patient with liver cirrhosis who underwent TAVI 2011 to 2014 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database using the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The primary outcome was the effect of liver cirrhosis on inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were the impact of liver cirrhosis on post-TAVI complications. We also evaluated the length of hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to address potential confounding. The cirrhotic patients who underwent TAVI had no significant increase in the risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 2.10, p = 0.734) or after procedural complications. Furthermore, cirrhotic patients were less likely to develop vascular complications requiring surgery (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.98, p = 0.043), to develop after procedural deep vein thrombosis(OR <0.00, 95% CI <0.001 to <0.0001, p <0.0001), and to require pacemaker implantation. However, cirrhotic patients were more likely to undergo nonroutine hospital discharges (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.96, p = 0.003). In conclusion, TAVI is a safe and reasonable therapeutic option for cirrhotic patients with severe aortic stenosis, requiring aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30041889     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Contemporary trends and outcomes in aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  Muhammad Z Khan; Muhammad U Khan; Muhammad Bilal Munir; Safi U Khan; Mohammed Osman; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Clinical outcomes of patients with hepatic insufficiency undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenkai Jiang; Zeyi Cheng; Shiyan Tu; Xing Wang; Caifei Xiang; Wence Zhou; Lin Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the patients with chronic liver disease: A mini-review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaochun Ma; Diming Zhao; Jinzhang Li; Dong Wei; Jianlin Zhang; Peidong Yuan; Xiangqian Kong; Jiwei Ma; Huibo Ma; Liangong Sun; Yuman Zhang; Qiqi Jiao; Zhengjun Wang; Haizhou Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Presence of mitral stenosis is a risk factor of new development of acute decompensated heart failure early after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Tsukasa Okai; Kazuki Mizutani; Masahiko Hara; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Mana Ogawa; Asahiro Ito; Shinichi Iwata; Yasuhiro Izumiya; Yosuke Takahashi; Toshihiko Shibata; Minoru Yoshiyama
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.