Literature DB >> 30041787

The Y-stenting technique for pulmonary artery bifurcation stenosis: Initial results and mid-term outcomes.

Maartje Conijn1, Hans Breur2, Mirella Molenschot3, Michiel Voskuil4, Gregor Krings5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment for main or peripheral PBS is challenging. An interventional approach is generally preferred as surgical angioplasty often results in residual stenosis. However, there is limited data on the mid- and long-term results of the different interventional approaches. The aim of this study is to report on initial and mid-term results of the Y-stenting technique for pulmonary artery bifurcation stenosis (PBS).
METHODS: A single centre retrospective study of all Y-stenting procedures for main or peripheral PBS was conducted. Patient and procedural data as well as mid-term outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: 11 Y-stenting procedures were performed, 9 in the main pulmonary bifurcation and 2 in the PA periphery. In 8 patients the bifurcation stents were connected, in 3 patients there was no connection between the stents. Y-stenting creates a geometry close to the physiological PA bifurcation anatomy with complete alignment to the vessel wall without flow separation. Control angiography showed unrestricted blood flow after all procedures. Median right/left ventricle pressure ratio decreased from 0.9 to 0.5. No immediate or delayed adverse events were seen. During a median follow-up of 33.5 months, 2 patients in the non-connected group and 3 patients in the connected group needed a total of 6 re-interventions. No intima proliferation was seen in patients with connected stents.
CONCLUSIONS: Y-stenting is a safe and effective treatment for PBS. When both bifurcation stents are connected, this may result in lower rates of in-stent intima proliferation in comparison to other PBS stenting techniques.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifurcation stenting; Congenital heart disease; Pulmonary artery stenosis; Y-stenting

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30041787     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  1 in total

Review 1.  Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Góreczny; Gregor Krings; Ziyad M Hijazi; Thomas Fagan; Darren Berman; Damien Kenny; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.426

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.