| Literature DB >> 30041436 |
Weiquan Ren1, Sheng Gao2, Huimin Zhang3, Yinglu Ren4, Xue Yu5, Weili Lin6,7, Shuzhen Guo8, Ruixin Zhu9, Wei Wang10.
Abstract
Qishen granules (QSG) have beneficial therapeutic effects for heart failure, but the effects of decomposed recipes, including Wenyang Yiqi Huoxue (WYH) and Qingre Jiedu (QJ), are not clear. In this study, the efficacy of WYH and QJ on heart failure is evaluated by using transverse aortic constriction (TAC) induced mice and the significantly changed genes in heart tissues were screened with a DNA array. Furthermore, a new quantitative pathway analysis tool is developed to evaluate the differences of pathways in different groups and to identify the pharmacological contributions of the decomposed recipes. Finally, the related genes in the significantly changed pathways are verified by a real-time polymerase chain reaction and a Western blot. Our data show that both QJ and WYH improve the left ventricular ejection fraction, which explain their contributions to protect against heart failure. In the energy metabolism, QJ achieves the therapeutic effects of QSG through nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt)-mediated mechanisms. In ventricular remodeling and inflammation reactions, QJ and WYH undertake the therapeutic effects through 5'-nucleotidase ecto (Nt5e)-mediated mechanisms. Together, QJ and WYH constitute the therapeutic effects of QSG and play important roles in myocardial energy metabolism and inflammation, which can exert therapeutic effects for heart failure.Entities:
Keywords: Qingre Jiedu; Qishen granules; Wenyang Yiqi Huoxue; decomposing formula; heart failure; quantitative pathway analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30041436 PMCID: PMC6100320 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Changes in cardiac ultrasound parameters after treatment.
| Group | N | LVIDd (mm) | LVIDs (mm) | LVPWd (mm) | LVPWs (mm) | LVAWd (mm) | LVAWs (mm) | LVEDV (μL) | LVESV (μL) | LVM (mg) | EF (%) | FS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 7 | 4.28 ± 0.09 ** | 3.12 ± 0.08 ** | 0.54 ± 0.03 ** | 0.54 ± 0.02 ** | 0.51 ± 0.03 ** | 0.51 ± 0.02 ** | 82.59 ± 4.02 ** | 38.82 ± 2.43 ** | 77.23 ± 6.34 ** | 52.59 ± 3.02 ** | 26.98 ± 2.00 ** |
| Model | 10 | 4.85 ± 0.13 ▲▲ | 4.14 ± 0.18 ▲▲ | 0.76 ± 0.02 ▲▲ | 0.73 ± 0.02 ▲▲ | 0.67 ± 0.02 ▲▲ | 0.7 ± 0.02 ▲▲ | 111.41 ± 6.77 ▲▲ | 77.95 ± 8.03 ▲▲ | 142.83 ± 9.43 ▲▲ | 31.51 ± 3.29 ▲▲ | 15.05 ± 1.69 ▲▲ |
| QSG | 8 | 4.57 ± 0.10 | 3.63 ± 0.13 * | 0.52 ± 0.01 ** | 0.51 ± 0.02 ** | 0.48 ± 0.01 ** | 0.49 ± 0.02 ** | 96.11 ± 4.67 | 56.43 ± 4.69 * | 82.00 ± 4.04 ** | 41.73 ± 2.95 * | 20.51 ± 1.62 * |
| WYH | 8 | 4.53 ± 0.15 * | 3.47 ± 0.15 ** | 0.57 ± 0.15 ** | 0.63 ± 0.05 * | 0.57 ± 0.16 **,# | 0.56 ± 0.02 **,# | 94.96 ± 7.36 * | 51.01 ± 5.18 ** | 94.27 ± 6.35 ** | 46.67 ± 2.78 ** | 23.39 ± 1.68 ** |
| QJ | 8 | 4.39 ± 0.12 * | 3.42 ± 0.11 ** | 0.54 ± 0.02 ** | 0.57 ± 0.02 ** | 0.58 ± 0.02 *,## | 0.57 ± 0.03 **,# | 88.24 ± 5.65 * | 48.89 ± 3.92 ** | 88.62 ± 5.82 ** | 44.66 ± 2.52 ** | 22.12 ± 1.49 * |
| Fosinopril sodium | 8 | 4.36 ± 0.17 * | 3.32 ± 0.23 ** | 0.62 ± 0.02 ** | 0.61 ± 0.02 * | 0.57 ± 0.03 ** | 0.62 ± 0.02 * | 86.30 ± 2.80 * | 45.11 ± 2.62 ** | 93.77 ± 4.61 ** | 47.92 ± 1.85 ** | 22.99 ± 1.12 ** |
▲▲p < 0.01, versus Sham group; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, versus Model group, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, versus QSG group. Data are shown as the mean ± SE. LVIDd: left ventricular internal diameter end diastole; LVIDs: left ventricular internal diameter end systole; LVPWd: left ventricular posterior wall thickness end diastole; LVPWs: left ventricular posterior wall thickness end systole; LVAWd: left ventricular anterior wall thickness end diastole; LVAWs: left ventricular anterior wall thickness end systole; LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV: left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVM: left ventricular mass; EF: ejection fraction; FS: left ventricular fraction shortening.
Figure 1Hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE) of the mouse heart from various treatment groups at the two indicated magnifications (×200 and ×400). (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) Qishen granules (QSG)-treated group; (D) Wenyang Yiqi Huoxue (WYH)-treated group; (E) Qingre Jiedu (QJ)-treated group; and (F) Fosinopril sodium-treated group.
Figure 2Mallory staining of the mouse heart from various treatment groups at the two indicated magnifications (×200 and ×400). (A) Sham group; (B) Model group; (C) QSG-treated group; (D) WYH-treated Group; (E) QJ-treated group; and (F) Fosinopril sodium-treated group. (G) the percentage of collagen in each of these groups. ** p < 0.01 relative to the model group. All data are presented as mean ± SE.
The differentially expressed genes of the decomposed recipes (QJ and WYH) in the heart failure-related pathways.
| Entrez ID | Gene Symbol | QJ Mean Expression | Fold Change | WYH Mean Expression | Fold Change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16000 | Igf1 | 64.23 | 0.490 | 0.013↓* | 77.62 | 0.595 | 0.057↓ |
| 108097 | Prkab2 | 467.22 | 0.457 | 0.040↓* | 515.14 | 0.459 | 0.045↓* |
| 21809 | Tgfb3 | 468.04 | 0.237 | 0.021↓* | 658.34 | 0.327 | 0.078↓ |
| 21813 | Tgfbr2 | 569.39 | 0.621 | 0.515↓ | 351.72 | 0.467 | 0.013↓* |
| 21808 | Tgfb2 | 71.23 | 0.128 | 0.012↓* | 93.69 | 0.166 | 0.019↓* |
| 18115 | Nnt | 45,948.78 | 2.120 | 0.001↑* | 37,695.71 | 1.660 | 0.008↑ |
| 23959 | Nt5e | 263.38 | 1.640 | 0.030↑ | 313.56 | 2.040 | 0.011↑* |
The p-value of differentially expressed genes are between the treatment group and the Model group. The arrows define the up or down regulation of the gene’s expression. * indicates the gene was significant differentially expressed (Fold change > 2 or Fold change < 0.5. p-value < 0.05).
Figure 3Gene expression in the mouse heart was determined using real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. Values were generated by converting the estimated marginal means from the RM-ANOVA using a fold change = . The expressions of (A) Igf1; (B) Tgfb2; (C) Prkab2; (D) Tgrbr2; (E) Tgfb3; (F) Nt5e; and (G) Nnt genes in the Sham, QSG, QJ, and WYH groups compared with the Model group. * p < 0.05 and ** p <0.01 relative to the Model group. All data are presented as mean ±SE.
Figure 4Western blot analysis of the Nnt and Nt5e protein levels in different treated mouse hearts. * p < 0.05 relative to the Model group. All data are presented as mean ± SE.
Figure 5The effects of the decomposed recipes (QJ and WYH) of QSG on heart failure. By studying the decomposed QSG, we found that the two decomposed recipes were therapeutic to heart failure. QJ affects the energy metabolism through Nnt-mediated mechanisms, while QJ and WYH both affect ventricular remodeling and inflammation reactions through Nt5e-mediated mechanisms.
Figure 6Schematic of the quantitative pathway profile. For the rows Gi corresponds to gene i. For the columns, Pj refers to pathway j. The red color means that foldchange >2; the blue color means foldchange <0.5; the white color means genes which are not in pathways.