Literature DB >> 30041060

Using optimal combined moderators to define heterogeneity in neural responses to randomized conditions: Application to the effect of sleep loss on fear learning.

Meredith L Wallace1, Layla Banihashemi2, Christopher O'Donnell3, Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar2, Chowdari Kodavali2, Rebecca McNamee2, Anne Germain2.   

Abstract

Comparing the neural outcomes of two randomized experimental groups is a primary aim of many functional neuroimaging studies. However, between-group effects can be obscured by heterogeneity in neural responses. Optimal Combined Moderator (OCM) approaches have previously been used to clarify heterogeneity in clinical outcomes following treatment randomization. We show that OCMs can also be used to clarify heterogeneity in the effect of a randomized experimental condition on neural responses. In 78 healthy adults aged 18-30 from the Effects of Dose-Dependent Sleep Disruption on Fear and Reward (SFeRe) study, we used demographic, clinical, genetic, and polysomnographic characteristics to develop OCMs for the effect of a randomized sleep restriction (SR) versus normal sleep (NS) condition on blood-oxygen-level dependent responses in the right amygdala (RAmyg) and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) during fear conditioning (FC) and extinction (FE) paradigms. The OCM for the RAmyg during FE was strongest [r (95% CI) = 0.52 (0.42, 0.68)], withstood cross-validation, and divided the sample into two subgroups with opposing experimental effects. Among N = 48 participants ("SR < NS"), those with SR exhibited less RAmyg activation during FE than those with NS [d (95%CI) = -1.10 (-1.86, -0.77)]. Among the remaining N = 30 participants ("SR > NS"), those with SR exhibited greater RAmyg activation during FE following SR than those with NS [d (95%CI) = 0.87 (0.37,1.78)]. SR > NS participants were more likely to be female, white, l/l genotype carriers, and have a psychiatric history. They had less sleep (overall and in REM), lower REM density, and lower spindle activity (12-16 Hz). Applying OCMs to randomized studies with neural outcomes can clarify neural heterogeneity and jumpstart mechanistic research; with further validation they also offer promise for personalized brain-based treatments and interventions.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Fear conditioning; Fear extinction; Genetic polymorphism; Moderator; Sleep

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30041060     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  3 in total

1.  International pooled patient-level meta-analysis of ketamine infusion for depression: In search of clinical moderators.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Nicholas Kissel; Andrew Baumeister; Rebecca Rohac; Mary L Woody; Elizabeth D Ballard; Carlos A Zarate; William Deakin; Chadi G Abdallah; Adriana Feder; Dennis S Charney; Michael F Grunebaum; J John Mann; Sanjay J Mathew; Bronagh Gallagher; Declan M McLoughlin; James W Murrough; Suresh Muthukumaraswamy; Rebecca McMillan; Rachael Sumner; George Papakostas; Maurizio Fava; Rebecca Hock; Jennifer L Phillips; Pierre Blier; Paulo Shiroma; Peter Šóš; Tung-Ping Su; Mu-Hong Chen; Mikael Tiger; Johan Lundberg; Samuel T Wilkinson; Meredith L Wallace
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 13.437

2.  Who benefits most from expectancy effects? A combined neuroimaging and antidepressant trial in depressed older adults.

Authors:  Sigal Zilcha-Mano; Meredith L Wallace; Patrick J Brown; Joel Sneed; Steven P Roose; Bret R Rutherford
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 7.989

Review 3.  Integrating sleep, neuroimaging, and computational approaches for precision psychiatry.

Authors:  Andrea N Goldstein-Piekarski; Bailey Holt-Gosselin; Kathleen O'Hora; Leanne M Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 7.853

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.