Literature DB >> 30040538

Literacy Assessment Via Telepractice Is Comparable to Face-to-Face Assessment in Children with Reading Difficulties Living in Rural Australia.

M Antoinette Hodge1, Rebecca Sutherland1, Kelly Jeng1, Gillian Bale2, Paige Batta2, Aine Cambridge2, Jeanette Detheridge2, Suzi Drevensek1, Lynda Edwards2, Margaret Everett2, Chelvi Ganesalingam1, Philippa Geier2, Carol Kass2, Susannah Mathieson2, Michael McCabe2, Kay Micallef2, Kirsty Molomby2, Silvia Pfeiffer3, Sylvia Pope2, Francine Tait2, Marcia Williamsz1, Lynne Young-Dwarte2, Natalie Silove1,4.   

Abstract

Background/Introduction: Literacy difficulties have significant long-term impacts on individuals, and therefore early identification and intervention are critical. Access to experienced professionals who conduct standardized literacy assessments with children is limited in rural and remote areas. The emerging literature supports the feasibility of using telepractice to overcome barriers to accessing specialist literacy assessment. The current study sought to determine the feasibility and reliability of telepractice assessments, using consumer-grade technology, in children with reading difficulties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven children, aged 8 to 12 years, with reading difficulties, attended a multidisciplinary reading clinic. Children completed literacy assessments delivered via a web-based application by a remotely located research assistant. A teacher was stationed with the child and coscored the assessments. Scores and qualitative observations of the two assessors were compared.
RESULTS: Spearman's correlation analyses revealed strong agreement between telepractice- and face-to-face-rated scores (r = 0.79-0.99). Bland-Altman plots indicated excellent agreement between derived scores. Parents reported a high degree of comfort with the telepractice assessments. Clinicians reported the audio and video quality was sound in most cases. DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSIONS: Web-based technology can enable remote delivery of literacy assessments. The technology has the potential to increase the availability of assessments to meet the needs of children who live remotely, in a timely manner and at their family's convenience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30040538     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  6 in total

1.  A Preliminary Comparison of In-Person and Telepractice Evaluations of Stuttering.

Authors:  Megann McGill; Jordan Siegel; Natasha Noureal
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Towards development of guidelines for virtual administration of paediatric standardized language and literacy assessments: Considerations for clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  Emily Wood; Insiya Bhalloo; Brittany McCaig; Cristina Feraru; Monika Molnar
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  Telehealth services for cardiac neurodevelopmental care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a site survey from the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Anjali Sadhwani; Renee Sananes; Elizabeth Blumenfeld; Jennifer L Butcher; Adam R Cassidy; Stephany M Cox; Joslyn Kenowitz; Thomas A Miller; Jacqueline H Sanz; Kelly R Wolfe; Dawn Ilardi
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 1.093

4.  A Web Platform for Standardized Data Acquisition, Processing, and Export in the Child Psychopathology Clinical Routine (MedicalBIT): Design and Implementation Study.

Authors:  Paola Colombo; Silvia Busti Ceccarelli; Stefano Pacchiarini; Stefano Cribellati; Massimo Molteni
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 5.  Available tools to evaluate digital health literacy and engagement with eHealth resources: A scoping review.

Authors:  Alice Faux-Nightingale; Fraser Philp; Darren Chadwick; Baldev Singh; Anand Pandyan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  Pediatric Teleneuropsychology: Feasibility and Recommendations.

Authors:  Danielle M Ransom; Sakina M Butt; Emily K DiVirgilio; Charles D Cederberg; Kyle D Srnka; Colleen T Hess; Megan C Sy; Jennifer M Katzenstein
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.813

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.