Literature DB >> 30040057

Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula and Graft Stenoses: Randomized Trial Comparing Drug-eluting Balloon Angioplasty with Conventional Angioplasty.

Farah Gillan Irani1, Terence Kiat Beng Teo1, Kiang Hiong Tay1, Win Htet Yin1, Hlaing Hlaing Win1, Apoorva Gogna1, Ankur Patel1, Chow Wei Too1, Shaun Xavier Ju Min Chan1, Richard Hoau Gong Lo1, Luke Han Wei Toh1, Siew Ping Chng1, Hui Lin Choong1, Bien Soo Tan1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare lesion primary patency and restenosis rates between drug-eluting balloon (DEB) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and conventional balloon PTA (cPTA) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) stenosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 119 participants (mean age, 59.2 years; 79 men, 40 women) with failing AVFs (n = 98) or AVGs (n = 21) were randomly assigned to undergo either DEB PTA (n = 59) or cPTA (n = 60) from January 2012 to May 2013. Primary end points were lesion primary patency and restenosis rates at 6 months; secondary outcomes were anatomic and clinical success after PTA, circuit primary patency at 6 months and 1 year, and lesion primary patency at 1 year. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator, and hazard ratio was calculated by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Complication rates were assessed in both groups. Results Estimated lesion primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.81 and 0.61, respectively, at 6 months (P = .03) and 0.51 and 0.34, respectively, at 1 year (P = .04). Estimated circuit primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.76 and 0.56, respectively, at 6 months (P = .048) and 0.45 and 0.32, respectively, at 1 year (P = .16). Restenosis rate was 34.0% (16 of 47) for DEB PTA and 62.9% (22 of 35) for cPTA at 6 months (P = .01). No major complications were noted. Conclusion Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty was effective in prolonging lesion primary patency of dialysis access stenoses at 6 months and 1 year. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30040057     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018170806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

Review 1.  Drug-Coated Balloons for the Dysfunctional Vascular Access: An Evidence-Based Road Map to Treatment and the Existing Obstacles.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kitrou; Konstantinos Katsanos; Georgia Andriana Georgopoulou; Dimitrios Karnabatidis
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty of Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Can Careful Selection of Patients Improve the Outcomes?

Authors:  Tahir Khan; Mudasir Bhat; Omair A Shah; Naseer A Choh; Shadab Maqsood; Tahleel A Shera
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-16

3.  Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jong Woo Kim; Jeong Ho Kim; Sung Su Byun; Jin Mo Kang; Ji Hoon Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Angiography and phlebography in a hemodialysis population: A retrospective analysis of interventional results.

Authors:  Ursula Hadimeri; Anna Wärme; Salmir Nasic; Sven-Göran Fransson; Ann Wigelius; Bernd Stegmayr
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 1.595

5.  SIroliMus coated angioPlasty versus plain balloon angioplasty in the tREatment of dialySis acceSs dysfunctION (IMPRESSION): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Suh Chien Pang; Ru Yu Tan; Edward Choke; Jackie Ho; Kiang Hiong Tay; Apoorva Gogna; Farah G Irani; Kun Da Zhuang; Luke Toh; Shaun Chan; Pradesh Krishnan; Kristen A Lee; Sum Leong; Richard Lo; Ankur Patel; Bien Soo Tan; Chow Wei Too; Jasmine Chua; Ren Kwang Alvin Tng; Tjun Yip Tang; Siew Ping Chng; Tze Tec Chong; Hsien Ts'ung Tay; Hao Yun Yap; Julian Wong; Rajesh Babu Dharmaraj; Jun Jie Ng; Anil Gopinathan; Eu Kuang Loh; Shao Jin Ong; Gary Yoong; Jia Sheng Tay; Kay Yuan Chong; Chieh Suai Tan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Paclitaxel coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty in dysfunctional dialysis arteriovenous fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Chuxuan Luo; Mingzhu Liang; Yueming Liu; Danna Zheng; Qiang He; Juan Jin
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of failing dialysis access: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Torbjörn Fransson; Anders Gottsäter; Mohammad Abdulrasak; Martin Malina; Timothy Resch
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Morphological Lesion Types Are Associated with Primary and Secondary Patency Rates after High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty for Dysfunctional Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Authors:  Li Chen; Weichen Zhang; Jinyun Tan; Min Hu; Weihao Shi; Minmin Zhang; Yong Wang; Bo Yu; Jing Chen
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.348

9.  Drug-coated balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula or graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Min-Tsun Liao; Meng-Kan Chen; Mu-Yang Hsieh; Nai-Lun Yeh; Kuo-Liong Chien; Chih-Ching Lin; Chih-Cheng Wu; Wei-Chu Chie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Early (6 months) results of a pilot prospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus coated balloon angioplasty for dysfunctional arterio-venous fistulas: MAgicTouch Intervention Leap for Dialysis Access (MATILDA) Trial.

Authors:  Tjun Y Tang; Shereen X Y Soon; Charyl J Q Yap; Sze Ling Chan; Ru Yu Tan; Suh Chien Pang; Shaun Q W Lee; Hao Yun Yap; Edward T C Choke; Chieh Suai Tan; Tze Tec Chong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.