Literature DB >> 30038023

Gating-induced large aqueous volumetric remodeling and aspartate tolerance in the voltage sensor domain of Shaker K+ channels.

Ignacio Díaz-Franulic1,2,3, Vivian González-Pérez4, Hans Moldenhauer5,2, Nieves Navarro-Quezada5,2, David Naranjo1.   

Abstract

Neurons encode electrical signals with critically tuned voltage-gated ion channels and enzymes. Dedicated voltage sensor domains (VSDs) in these membrane proteins activate coordinately with an unresolved structural change. Such change conveys the transmembrane translocation of four positively charged arginine side chains, the voltage-sensing residues (VSRs; R1-R4). Countercharges and lipid phosphohead groups likely stabilize these VSRs within the low-dielectric core of the protein. However, the role of hydration, a sign-independent charge stabilizer, remains unclear. We replaced all VSRs and their neighboring residues with negatively charged aspartates in a voltage-gated potassium channel. The ensuing mild functional effects indicate that hydration is also important in VSR stabilization. The voltage dependency of the VSR aspartate variants approached the expected arithmetic summation of charges at VSR positions, as if negative and positive side chains faced similar pathways. In contrast, aspartates introduced between R2 and R3 did not affect voltage dependence as if the side chains moved outside the electric field or together with it, undergoing a large displacement and volumetric remodeling. Accordingly, VSR performed osmotic work at both internal and external aqueous interfaces. Individual VSR contributions to volumetric works approached arithmetical additivity but were largely dissimilar. While R1 and R4 displaced small volumes, R2 and R3 volumetric works were massive and vectorially opposed, favoring large aqueous remodeling during VSD activation. These diverse volumetric works are, at least for R2 and R3, not compatible with VSR translocation across a unique stationary charge transfer center. Instead, VSRs may follow separated pathways across a fluctuating low-dielectric septum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shaker; charge hydration; conformational change; osmotic work; voltage sensor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30038023      PMCID: PMC6094148          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806578115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  45 in total

1.  Gating charge displacement in voltage-gated ion channels involves limited transmembrane movement.

Authors:  Baron Chanda; Osei Kwame Asamoah; Rikard Blunck; Benoît Roux; Francisco Bezanilla
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Structural dynamics of an isolated voltage-sensor domain in a lipid bilayer.

Authors:  Sudha Chakrapani; Luis G Cuello; D Marien Cortes; Eduardo Perozo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Sequential formation of ion pairs during activation of a sodium channel voltage sensor.

Authors:  Paul G DeCaen; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Elizabeth M Sharp; Todd Scheuer; William A Catterall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Coupling between voltage sensors and activation gate in voltage-gated K+ channels.

Authors:  Zhe Lu; Angela M Klem; Yajamana Ramu
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Ion-pairs in proteins.

Authors:  D J Barlow; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Transfer of twelve charges is needed to open skeletal muscle Na+ channels.

Authors:  B Hirschberg; A Rovner; M Lieberman; J Patlak
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Specificity of charge-carrying residues in the voltage sensor of potassium channels.

Authors:  Christopher A Ahern; Richard Horn
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Structure and hydration of membranes embedded with voltage-sensing domains.

Authors:  Dmitriy Krepkiy; Mihaela Mihailescu; J Alfredo Freites; Eric V Schow; David L Worcester; Klaus Gawrisch; Douglas J Tobias; Stephen H White; Kenton J Swartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Stabilizing the closed S6 gate in the Shaker Kv channel through modification of a hydrophobic seal.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kitaguchi; Manana Sukhareva; Kenton J Swartz
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Two separate interfaces between the voltage sensor and pore are required for the function of voltage-dependent K(+) channels.

Authors:  Seok-Yong Lee; Anirban Banerjee; Roderick MacKinnon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pore-modulating toxins exploit inherent slow inactivation to block K+ channels.

Authors:  Izhar Karbat; Hagit Altman-Gueta; Shachar Fine; Tibor Szanto; Shelly Hamer-Rogotner; Orly Dym; Felix Frolow; Dalia Gordon; Gyorgy Panyi; Michael Gurevitz; Eitan Reuveny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A folding reaction at the C-terminal domain drives temperature sensing in TRPM8 channels.

Authors:  Ignacio Díaz-Franulic; Natalia Raddatz; Karen Castillo; Fernando D González-Nilo; Ramon Latorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trans-toxin ion-sensitivity of charybdotoxin-blocked potassium-channels reveals unbinding transitional states.

Authors:  Hans Moldenhauer; Ignacio Díaz-Franulic; Horacio Poblete; David Naranjo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Roles for Countercharge in the Voltage Sensor Domain of Ion Channels.

Authors:  James R Groome; Landon Bayless-Edwards
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Binding of κ-Conotoxin-PVIIA to Open and Closed Shaker K-Channels Are Differentially Affected by the Ionic Strength.

Authors:  David Naranjo; Ignacio Díaz-Franulic
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.