Literature DB >> 30037832

Correlations Between Primary Motor Cortex Activity with Recent Past and Future Limb Motion During Unperturbed Reaching.

Tomohiko Takei1,2,3, Frédéric Crevecoeur1,4,5, Troy M Herter1,6, Kevin P Cross1, Stephen H Scott7,8,9.   

Abstract

Many studies highlight that human movements are highly successful yet display a surprising amount of variability from trial to trial. There is a consistent pattern of variability throughout movement: initial motor errors are corrected by the end of movement, suggesting the presence of a powerful online control process. Here, we analyze the trial-by-trial variability of goal-directed reaching in nonhuman primates (five male Rhesus monkeys) and demonstrate that they display a similar pattern of variability during reaching, including a strong negative correlation between initial and late hand motion. We then demonstrate that trial-to-trial neural variability of primary motor cortex (M1) is positively correlated with variability of future hand motion (τ = ∼160 ms) during reaching. Furthermore, the variability of M1 activity is also correlated with variability of past hand motion (τ = ∼90 ms), but in the opposite polarity (i.e., negative correlation). Partial correlation analysis demonstrated that M1 activity independently reflects the variability of both past and future hand motions. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that M1 activity is involved in online feedback control of motor actions.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Previous studies highlight that primary motor cortex (M1) rapidly responds to either visual or mechanical disturbances, suggesting its involvement in online feedback control. However, these studies required external disturbances to the motor system and it is not clear whether a similar feedback process addresses internal noise/errors generated by the motor system itself. Here, we introduce a novel analysis that evaluates how variations in the activity of M1 neurons covary with variations in hand motion on a trial-to-trial basis. The analyses demonstrate that M1 activity is correlated with hand motion in both the near future and the recent past, but with opposite polarity. These results suggest that M1 is involved in online feedback motor control to address errors/noise within the motor system.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387787-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback processing; motor control; motor variability; nonhuman primates; primary motor cortex; reaching

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30037832      PMCID: PMC6596081          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2667-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching.

Authors:  S H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Prediction of muscle activity by populations of sequentially recorded primary motor cortex neurons.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Influence of the behavioral goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Complex spatiotemporal tuning in human upper-limb muscles.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Timothy P Lillicrap; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search.

Authors:  K G Thompson; D P Hanes; N P Bichot; J D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex.

Authors:  S H Scott; J F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent.

Authors:  K J Friston; K J Worsley; R S Frackowiak; J C Mazziotta; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Rapid online selection between multiple motor plans.

Authors:  Joseph Y Nashed; Frédéric Crevecoeur; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Motor Cortical Visuomotor Feedback Activity Is Initially Isolated from Downstream Targets in Output-Null Neural State Space Dimensions.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  Instantaneous Midbrain Control of Saccade Velocity.

Authors:  Ivan Smalianchuk; Uday K Jagadisan; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Maintained Representations of the Ipsilateral and Contralateral Limbs during Bimanual Control in Primary Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; Ethan A Heming; Douglas J Cook; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Changes in Functional Connectivity of Specific Cerebral Regions in Patients with Toothache: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Shi-Nan Wu; Meng-Yao Zhang; Hui-Ye Shu; Rong-Bin Liang; Qian-Ming Ge; Yi-Cong Pan; Li-Juan Zhang; Qiu-Yu Li; Yi Shao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Independent representations of ipsilateral and contralateral limbs in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Ethan A Heming; Kevin P Cross; Tomohiko Takei; Douglas J Cook; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.