Christian-Alexander Behrendt1, Henrik C Rieß2, Thea Schwaneberg2, Axel Larena-Avellaneda2, Tilo Kölbel2, Nikolaos Tsilimparis2, Kostas Spanos2, Eike S Debus2, Art Sedrakyan3. 1. Department of Vascular Medicine, Working Group German Vasc, German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: behrendt@hamburg.de. 2. Department of Vascular Medicine, Working Group German Vasc, German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: Colonic ischaemia (CI) is a severe complication following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, leading to high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of CI following AAA repair. METHODS: National claims from Germany's third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, were used to investigate CI after intact (iAAA) and ruptured (rAAA) AAA repairs. Patients undergoing endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical (OSR) repairs between January 2008 and December 2017 were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 9145 patients (8248 iAAA and 897 rAAA) undergoing EVAR or OSR procedures and the median follow up was 2.28 years. Most patients were male (79.2% iAAA, 79.3% rAAA); the median age was 73.0 years (iAAA group) and 76.0 years (rAAA group). Overall, CI occurred 97 (1.2%) times after iAAA and 95 (10.6%) after rAAA. In univariable analyses CI occurred less often after EVAR than after OSR (0.6% vs. 3.7%; p < .001). Acute post-operative renal and respiratory insufficiencies were also related to the occurrence of CI (p < .001). CI was associated with greater in hospital mortality (42.2% vs. 2.7% for iAAA, 64.2% vs. 36.3% for rAAA; p < .001) and lower long-term survival for iAAA (Kaplan-Meier analysis). In multivariable analyses, rAAA (odds ratio [OR] 5.59), and higher van Walraven comorbidity score (OR 1.09) were independently associated with greater risk of CI occurrence. EVAR use (OR 0.30) was protective. EVAR use remained protective in stratified analyses within iAAA (OR 0.32) and rAAA (OR 0.26). CONCLUSION: Post-operative CI after AAA repair is not common but is associated with worse in hospital outcomes and lower long-term survival. EVAR was protective after both rAAA and iAAA repairs. When discussing the treatment of AAA with patients the protective effect of EVAR should be considered. Future studies should validate predictive scores and advance preventive strategies.
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND:Colonic ischaemia (CI) is a severe complication following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, leading to high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of CI following AAA repair. METHODS: National claims from Germany's third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, were used to investigate CI after intact (iAAA) and ruptured (rAAA) AAA repairs. Patients undergoing endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical (OSR) repairs between January 2008 and December 2017 were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 9145 patients (8248 iAAA and 897 rAAA) undergoing EVAR or OSR procedures and the median follow up was 2.28 years. Most patients were male (79.2% iAAA, 79.3% rAAA); the median age was 73.0 years (iAAA group) and 76.0 years (rAAA group). Overall, CI occurred 97 (1.2%) times after iAAA and 95 (10.6%) after rAAA. In univariable analyses CI occurred less often after EVAR than after OSR (0.6% vs. 3.7%; p < .001). Acute post-operative renal and respiratory insufficiencies were also related to the occurrence of CI (p < .001). CI was associated with greater in hospital mortality (42.2% vs. 2.7% for iAAA, 64.2% vs. 36.3% for rAAA; p < .001) and lower long-term survival for iAAA (Kaplan-Meier analysis). In multivariable analyses, rAAA (odds ratio [OR] 5.59), and higher van Walraven comorbidity score (OR 1.09) were independently associated with greater risk of CI occurrence. EVAR use (OR 0.30) was protective. EVAR use remained protective in stratified analyses within iAAA (OR 0.32) and rAAA (OR 0.26). CONCLUSION: Post-operative CI after AAA repair is not common but is associated with worse in hospital outcomes and lower long-term survival. EVAR was protective after both rAAA and iAAA repairs. When discussing the treatment of AAA with patients the protective effect of EVAR should be considered. Future studies should validate predictive scores and advance preventive strategies.
Authors: Dmitriy I Dovzhanskiy; Maani Hakimi; Moritz S Bischoff; Caro la M Wieker; Thilo Hackert; Dittmar Böckler Journal: Chirurg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 0.955