Benjamin C Noonan1, Samuel Bachmaier2, Coen A Wijdicks3, Asheesh Bedi4. 1. Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Fargo, North Dakota, U.S.A. 2. Department of Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Research, Arthrex GmbH, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: coen.wijdicks@arthrex.de. 4. MedSport and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow on initial tension and elongation behavior for femoral adjustable loop devices (ALDs) and closed loop devices (CLDs) in suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial screw fixation in a biomechanical in vitro study. METHODS: Three ACLR groups with tibial screw fixation were biomechanically tested in a full-construct setup using porcine tibias. Groups (n = 8 per group) varied by femoral fixation method and consisted of a CLD (group 3) and ALD fixation with (group 2) and without simulated intraoperative preconditioning (group 1). The change in tension after screw insertion and the displacement to restore the initial loading situation were measured. Grafts underwent dynamic cycling (1,000 cycles at 0.75 Hz) using both a position and a force control mode. RESULTS: Data are presented as mean [standard deviation]. Placement of an interference screw induced a graft tension loss of 62% (49.4 [0.4] N vs 19.0 [10.0] N, P < .001) by introducing a laxity of 0.53 [0.26] mm. Intraoperative preconditioning led to a higher initial load level (228.3 [19.8] N) compared with unconditioned ALD (156.1 [25.5] N, P < .001) and CLD groups (156.6 [12.8] N, P < .001) with less force decrease over position-controlled cyclic loading. Furthermore, initial (-0.22 [0.16] mm) and dynamic elongation (0.88 [0.23] mm) were reduced compared with the unconditioned ALD (0.65 [0.35] mm, P < .001; and 1.56 [0.19] mm, P < .001) and CLD groups (0.16 [0.26] mm, P < .001; and 1.64 [0.24] mm, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ACLR with femoral ALD fixation and intraoperative preconditioning allows for restoration of time-zero screw-imparted slack and leads to significantly reduced cyclic elongation in accordance with native ACL function. Both ALD and CLD control groups behaved similarly, with total elongation less than 3 mm including time-zero slack. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the clinical relevance of time-zero graft tension loss is uncertain, the use of an ALD in concert with tibial screw fixation may be favorable to allow for tension optimization.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preconditioning according to intraoperative workflow on initial tension and elongation behavior for femoral adjustable loop devices (ALDs) and closed loop devices (CLDs) in suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with tibial screw fixation in a biomechanical in vitro study. METHODS: Three ACLR groups with tibial screw fixation were biomechanically tested in a full-construct setup using porcine tibias. Groups (n = 8 per group) varied by femoral fixation method and consisted of a CLD (group 3) and ALD fixation with (group 2) and without simulated intraoperative preconditioning (group 1). The change in tension after screw insertion and the displacement to restore the initial loading situation were measured. Grafts underwent dynamic cycling (1,000 cycles at 0.75 Hz) using both a position and a force control mode. RESULTS: Data are presented as mean [standard deviation]. Placement of an interference screw induced a graft tension loss of 62% (49.4 [0.4] N vs 19.0 [10.0] N, P < .001) by introducing a laxity of 0.53 [0.26] mm. Intraoperative preconditioning led to a higher initial load level (228.3 [19.8] N) compared with unconditioned ALD (156.1 [25.5] N, P < .001) and CLD groups (156.6 [12.8] N, P < .001) with less force decrease over position-controlled cyclic loading. Furthermore, initial (-0.22 [0.16] mm) and dynamic elongation (0.88 [0.23] mm) were reduced compared with the unconditioned ALD (0.65 [0.35] mm, P < .001; and 1.56 [0.19] mm, P < .001) and CLD groups (0.16 [0.26] mm, P < .001; and 1.64 [0.24] mm, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ACLR with femoral ALD fixation and intraoperative preconditioning allows for restoration of time-zero screw-imparted slack and leads to significantly reduced cyclic elongation in accordance with native ACL function. Both ALD and CLD control groups behaved similarly, with total elongation less than 3 mm including time-zero slack. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the clinical relevance of time-zero graft tension loss is uncertain, the use of an ALD in concert with tibial screw fixation may be favorable to allow for tension optimization.
Authors: Peter J C McEwen; Milford McArthur; Sarah G Brereton; William B O'Callaghan; Matthew P R Wilkinson Journal: Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol Date: 2020-10-07
Authors: Samuel Bachmaier; Gregory S DiFelice; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Wiemi A Douoguih; Patrick A Smith; Lee J Pace; Daniel Ritter; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-01-29