Literature DB >> 30037486

Engagement of private providers in immunization in the Western Pacific region.

Ananda Amarasinghe1, Laura Davison2, Sergey Diorditsa3.   

Abstract

Financial sustainability of national immunization programmes (NIPs) in the Western Pacific is a growing concern. In the face of decreasing donor support for public immunization programmes, the role of private providers is becoming growingly important in attaining and sustaining programme achievements. Two-thirds of Member States in the Region have engaged the private sector in their immunization programmes, however little is known about the range and type of engagement. A survey was conducted in 2016 to map the scope and characteristics of private provider involvement, in order to inform guidance for decision makers. 14 countries participated, with responses from NIPs, national regulatory agencies, national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs), and private providers (defined as any entity other than the government). Findings revealed that most countries have policies and regulations concerning private providers, but 50% of private provider respondents were unaware that such policies are available. In most countries private providers' contribution is limited to less than 10% of the total target population. Private providers in only 6 countries surveyed follow the vaccination schedule recommended by the NIP, with demand by vaccine recipients being the main cause of deviation. A majority (>70%) of private provider respondents believe that clients seeks their services not because of perception of quality, but to access new vaccines unavailable through the NIP. Private providers in all countries received vaccines from the NIP at no cost, for which they only charge clients a service fee. The majority of private providers received training from the NIP, whereas only around 25% of them received training from their own institutions. Private providers from 11 countries share EPI performance data and adverse events following immunization, however, NIPs perceive this data as suboptimal. Private providers have a limited role in decision making processes, such as NITAGs. Further effective engagement of private sector providers has the potential to improve overall efficiency of immunization service delivery.
Copyright © 2018 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunization; Private providers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30037486     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  4 in total

Review 1.  Adult Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Coverage in China from 2011 to 2021: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xinxin Bai; Lu Chen; Xinyao Liu; Yujia Tong; Lu Wang; Minru Zhou; Yanming Li; Guangyu Hu
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Scope and magnitude of private sector financing and provision of immunization in Benin, Malawi and Georgia.

Authors:  Ann Levin; Spy Munthali; Venance Vodungbo; Natia Rukhadze; Kuhu Maitra; Tesfaye Ashagari; Logan Brenzel
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Prospects for rotavirus vaccine introduction in the Philippines: Bridging the available evidence into immunization policy.

Authors:  Anna Lena Lopez; Peter Francis Raguindin; Maria Wilda T Silva
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Key recommendations to strengthen public-private partnership for adolescent health in resource constrained settings: Formative qualitative inquiry in Mongolia, Myanmar and the Philippines.

Authors:  Peter S Azzopardi; Julie Hennegan; Shirley Mark Prabhu; Bolorchimeg Dagva; Mx Mar Balibago; Pa Pa Win Htin; Zay Yar Swe; Elissa C Kennedy
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.