Literature DB >> 30037423

Usefulness of Serum Procalcitonin as a Markerfor Coexisting Infection in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Itzhak Vitkon-Barkay1, Tsilia Lazarovitch2, Dror Marchaim3, Ronit Zaidenstein3, Elizabeth Temkin4, Emily T Martin5, Hannah E Segaloff5, Ilya Litovchik1, Victoria Rum6, Chana Richter7, Oran Tzuman8, Zvi Vered1, Saar Minha9.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) also present with clinical manifestations of inflammatory response, which may be confused with a concomitant infection. This leads to a dilemma regarding the empiric use of antibiotics. We explored if serum procalcitonin (PCT), which is known to be elevated in bacterial infections, may be utilized to rule-out bacterial infection in AMI patients. In this prospective, single center study, PCT was collected within 48 hours from AMI patients. Patients' demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected prospectively. Two experienced infectious diseases specialists blinded to the PCT results independently determined the presence of infection in every patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to determine the accuracy of PCT, fever, white blood cell (WBC) count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for the diagnosis of the infection. The analysis included 230 AMI patients (age 63.0 ± 13.0 years) of whom 36 (15.6%) had coexisting infections. The best cutoff for PCT as a differentiating marker between patients with and without coexisting infection was 0.09 ng/dl (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 85.1%, area under the curve 0.94). PCT outperformed CRP, WBC, and fever for diagnosing infection. In conclusion, compared with CRP, fever, and WBC, serum PCT had a better performance in differentiating infected from noninfected AMI patients and thus should be considered as an adjunct test when facing the dilemma of initiating empiric antibiotic in AMI patient demonstrating inflammatory signs.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30037423     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Procalcitonin Predicts Bacterial Infection, but Not Long-Term Occurrence of Adverse Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Rita Pavasini; Gioele Fabbri; Federico Marchini; Nicola Bianchi; Maria Angela Deserio; Federico Sanguettoli; Filippo Maria Verardi; Daniela Segala; Graziella Pompei; Elisabetta Tonet; Matteo Serenelli; Serena Caglioni; Gabriele Guardigli; Gianluca Campo; Rosario Cultrera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Cristian Stătescu; Larisa Anghel; Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi; Andreea Leonte; Laura-Cătălina Benchea; Radu-Andy Sascău
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Association of Myocardial Injury With Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Martin Reindl; Christina Tiller; Magdalena Holzknecht; Ivan Lechner; Benjamin Henninger; Agnes Mayr; Christoph Brenner; Gert Klug; Axel Bauer; Bernhard Metzler; Sebastian J Reinstadler
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.