| Literature DB >> 30037112 |
Aline Boveto Santamarina1, Giovana Jamar2, Laís Vales Mennitti3, Veridiana Vera de Rosso4, Helena Cassia Cesar5, Lila Missae Oyama6, Luciana Pellegrini Pisani7,8.
Abstract
Obesity is associated with modern diets that are rich in saturated fatty acids. These dietary patterns are linked to low-grade proinflammatory mechanisms, such as the toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathway rapidly activated through high-fat diets. Juçara is a berry rich in anthocyanins and unsaturated fatty acids, which prevents obesity and associated comorbidities. We evaluated the effect of different doses of freeze-dried juçara pulp on NF-κB pathway after the consumption of short-term high-fat diet. Male Wistar rats with ad libitum access to food and water were divided into four groups: Control diet (C), high-fat diet (HFC), high-fat diet with 0.25% juçara (HFJ 0.25%), and high-fat diet with 0.5% juçara (HFJ 0.5%). Energy intake and body weight gain were increased in HFC and HFJ 0.5% groups compared to C group. The hypothalamus weight reduced in the HFC group compared to C and HFJ 0.25% groups. Cytokines, MYD88, TRAF6, and pNF-κBp50 levels in the hypothalamus, serum triacylglycerol, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and free fatty acid levels were improved in the HFJ 0.25% group. In summary, the HFJ 0.25% group had better protective effects than those in the HFJ 0.5%. Therefore, 0.25% juçara can be used to protect against central inflammation through the high-fat diet-induced NF-κB pathway.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB pathway; hypothalamus; inflammation; juçara; short-term high-fat diet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30037112 PMCID: PMC6100376 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) Mean daily energy intake estimative during the experiment; (b) body weight gain (Δ). # p < 0.05 compared with the control diet (C) group (n = 6 or 7).
Relative tissue weight among different experimental groups.
| Tissue | (g/100 g of Body Mass) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | HFC | HFJ 0.25% | HFJ 0.5% | |||||
| Mean | S.E.M. | Mean | S.E.M. | Mean | S.E.M. | Mean | S.E.M. | |
| Hypothalamus | 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.02 #,* | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.03 | 0.001 |
| Liver | 2.92 | 0.09 | 2.81 | 0.05 | 2.87 | 0.07 | 2.80 | 0.03 |
| RET | 0.93 | 0.13 | 1.68 # | 0.14 | 1.27 | 0.14 | 1.39 | 0.15 |
| EPI | 1.03 | 0.085 | 1.37 | 0.112 | 1.16 | 0.12 | 1.06 | 0.14 |
| MES | 0.98 | 0.16 | 1.03 | 0.10 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 1.09 | 0.09 |
| ΣWAT | 2.94 | 0.32 | 4.07 # | 0.21 | 3.39 | 0.26 | 3.54 | 0.30 |
#p < 0.05 versus control group (C) (n = 6 or 7); * p < 0.05 versus to high-fat juçara 0.25% (HFJ 0.25%) (n = 6 or 7).
Lipoproteins, triacylglycerol, free fatty acids and adiponectin analyses performed among the different experimental groups.
| Parameter | Experimental Groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | HFC ( | HFJ 0.25% ( | HFJ 0.5% ( | |||||
| Mean | S.E.M | Mean | S.E.M. | Mean | S.E.M. | Mean | S.E.M. | |
| triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 104.84 | 2.91 | 117.96 | 7.15 | 109.84 | 4.86 | 120.55 *,# | 6.70 |
| total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 108.13 | 6.24 | 136.40 # | 10.44 | 118.04 | 6.02 | 133.41 | 12.38 |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 54.72 | 3.44 | 46.21 | 4.05 | 48.86 | 3.96 | 47.11 | 4.30 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 41.30 | 9.49 | 68.32 #,* | 5.15 | 50.79 | 9.38 | 58.42 | 9.95 |
| Free fatty acids (mM/mL) | 1.87 | 1.65 | 2.05 * | 2.74 | 1.39 | 5.40 | 1.97 | 2.08 |
| Adiponectin (ng/mL) | 1.77 | 0.029 | 1.92 | 0.33 | 2.69 | 0.48 # | 1.95 | 0.32 |
#p < 0.05 versus control group (C); * p < 0.05 versus to high-fat juçara 0.25% (HFJ 0.25%).
Figure 2Cytokine levels of protein extract samples from the hypothalamus: (a) TNF-α, (b) Il-10, and (c) IL-6. * p < 0.05 compared with the high-fat juçara 0.25% (HFJ 0.25%) group; # p < 0.05 compared with the control diet (C) group (n = 6 or 7).
Figure 3Protein expression in the NF-κB pathway in the hypothalamus: (a) TLR4, (b) MYD88, (c) TRAF6, and (d) pNF-κBp50. The housekeeping used for all analyses was β-actin expression. * p < 0.05 compared with the high-fat juçara 0.25% (HFJ 0.25%) group; # p < 0.05 compared with the control diet (C) group (n = 6).
Juçara pulp (E. edulis Mart.) characterization.
| Juçara Pulp | Concentration in 100 g of Fresh Matter | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | S.E.M | ||
| Moisture (%) | 88.7 | 3.8 | [ |
| 28.3 | 3.5 | [ | |
| Proteins (g) | 6.0 | 0.3 | [ |
| Lipids (g) | 29.2 | 0.9 | [ |
|
| 34.43 | 3.42 | [ |
|
| 3.01 | 0.30 | [ |
| SAT (%) | 37.44 | [ | |
|
| 2.61 | 0.26 | [ |
|
| 35.96 | 3.08 | [ |
| MUFA (%) | 38.57 | [ | |
|
| 19.18 | 1.89 | [ |
|
| 0.91 | 0.20 | [ |
| PUFA (%) | 20.08 | [ | |
| Fiber (g) | 28.3 | 0.3 | [ |
| Ashes (g) | 8.8 | 0.8 | [ |
|
|
|
| [ |
| Cyanidin 3-rutinoside (mg) | 191.0 | 6.5 | [ |
| Cyanidin 3-glucoside (mg) | 71.4 | 2.1 | [ |
|
|
|
| [ |
| Apigenin deoxyhexosyl-hexoside (mg) | 25.4 | 1.5 | [ |
| Luteolin deoxyhexosyl-hexoside (mg) | 37.6 | 1.9 | [ |
| Dihydrokaempferol-hexoside (mg) | 66.4 | 2.6 | [ |
|
|
|
| [ |
Ingredients and nutritional composition of experimental diets proposed by Dornellas [18] supplemented or not with juçara pulp.
| Ingredients | Diet (g/100 g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | HF Control | HF Juçara 0.25% | HF Juçara 0.5% | |
| Standard chow | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Sucrose | - | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Casein | - | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Soybean Oil | - | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Lard | - | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| Butyl hydroquinone | - | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Juçara pulp powder | - | - | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| Protein | 22.4 | 23.6 | 23.6 | 23.6 |
| Total fat | 4.8 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
| Carbohydrates | 39.1 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 26.8 |
| Alimentary fiber | 11.4 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 15.1 |
| Mineral residues | 11.9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Energy (Kcal/100 g) | 270 | 410 | 420 | 430 |